The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Mapping populations at risk: improving spatial demographic data for infectious disease modeling and metric derivation

Mapping populations at risk: improving spatial demographic data for infectious disease modeling and metric derivation
Mapping populations at risk: improving spatial demographic data for infectious disease modeling and metric derivation
ABSTRACT: The use of Global Positioning Systems (GPS) and Geographical Information Systems (GIS) in disease surveys and reporting is becoming increasingly routine, enabling a better understanding of spatial epidemiology and the improvement of surveillance and control strategies. In turn, the greater availability of spatially referenced epidemiological data is driving the rapid expansion of disease mapping and spatial modeling methods, which are becoming increasingly detailed and sophisticated, with rigorous handling of uncertainties. This expansion has, however, not been matched by advancements in the development of spatial datasets of human population distribution that accompany disease maps or spatial models. Where risks are heterogeneous across population groups or space or dependent on transmission between individuals, spatial data on human population distributions and demographic structures are required to estimate infectious disease risks, burdens, and dynamics. The disease impact in terms of morbidity, mortality, and speed of spread varies substantially with demographic profiles, so that identifying the most exposed or affected populations becomes a key aspect of planning and targeting interventions. Subnational breakdowns of population counts by age and sex are routinely collected during national censuses and maintained in finer detail within microcensus data. Moreover, demographic and health surveys continue to collect representative and contemporary samples from clusters of communities in low-income countries where census data may be less detailed and not collected regularly. Together, these freely available datasets form a rich resource for quantifying and understanding the spatial variations in the sizes and distributions of those most at risk of disease in low income regions, yet at present, they remain unconnected data scattered across national statistical offices and websites. In this paper we discuss the deficiencies of existing spatial population datasets and their limitations on epidemiological analyses. We review sources of detailed, contemporary, freely available and relevant spatial demographic data focusing on low income regions where such data are often sparse and highlight the value of incorporating these through a set of examples of their application in disease studies. Moreover, the importance of acknowledging, measuring, and accounting for uncertainty in spatial demographic datasets is outlined. Finally, a strategy for building an open-access database of spatial demographic data that is tailored to epidemiological applications is put forward.
population, epidemiology, demography, disease mapping
8
Tatem, A.J.
6c6de104-a5f9-46e0-bb93-a1a7c980513e
Adamo, S.
e0d0974e-a1f2-4bca-8ca4-d2a053111ba0
Bharti, N.
14714667-2a53-46e3-90fc-357a264dbdbc
Burgert, C.R.
7e3d8a98-a6ae-4bb6-bf8b-8a899a23f933
Castro, M.
7b028f0d-a633-4149-9522-1b3797bae8cf
Dorelien, A.
85642cb4-e582-44e7-9075-952177dd4dd1
Fink, G.
dcec105e-f403-4d45-a63e-43031d519d8a
Linard, C.
40dc396f-bbf0-4ae2-8732-7a73447a9100
Mendelsohn, J.
2372a2a5-8f7a-4591-a7cc-866b461395ac
Montana, L.
32d34ae0-75ea-4618-b768-22ed954a7bed
Montgomery, M.R.
cc4376eb-d2de-485a-9d1c-42c5c069b5c9
Nelson, A.
6207f97d-f330-408b-8e2b-b33d1e13e9ae
Noor, A.M.
241236c3-43df-47b0-bcab-ff7c25318cc6
Pindolia, D.
5942f556-4637-45fb-a070-8966828809a9
Yetman, G.
1bbb65a4-63dc-41c7-bdf8-47d4031270b4
Balk, D.
3b28d3d8-f2cc-4195-ad9d-69a025de0305
Tatem, A.J.
6c6de104-a5f9-46e0-bb93-a1a7c980513e
Adamo, S.
e0d0974e-a1f2-4bca-8ca4-d2a053111ba0
Bharti, N.
14714667-2a53-46e3-90fc-357a264dbdbc
Burgert, C.R.
7e3d8a98-a6ae-4bb6-bf8b-8a899a23f933
Castro, M.
7b028f0d-a633-4149-9522-1b3797bae8cf
Dorelien, A.
85642cb4-e582-44e7-9075-952177dd4dd1
Fink, G.
dcec105e-f403-4d45-a63e-43031d519d8a
Linard, C.
40dc396f-bbf0-4ae2-8732-7a73447a9100
Mendelsohn, J.
2372a2a5-8f7a-4591-a7cc-866b461395ac
Montana, L.
32d34ae0-75ea-4618-b768-22ed954a7bed
Montgomery, M.R.
cc4376eb-d2de-485a-9d1c-42c5c069b5c9
Nelson, A.
6207f97d-f330-408b-8e2b-b33d1e13e9ae
Noor, A.M.
241236c3-43df-47b0-bcab-ff7c25318cc6
Pindolia, D.
5942f556-4637-45fb-a070-8966828809a9
Yetman, G.
1bbb65a4-63dc-41c7-bdf8-47d4031270b4
Balk, D.
3b28d3d8-f2cc-4195-ad9d-69a025de0305

Tatem, A.J., Adamo, S., Bharti, N., Burgert, C.R., Castro, M., Dorelien, A., Fink, G., Linard, C., Mendelsohn, J., Montana, L., Montgomery, M.R., Nelson, A., Noor, A.M., Pindolia, D., Yetman, G. and Balk, D. (2012) Mapping populations at risk: improving spatial demographic data for infectious disease modeling and metric derivation. Population Health Metrics, 10 (1), 8. (doi:10.1186/1478-7954-10-8). (PMID:22591595)

Record type: Article

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The use of Global Positioning Systems (GPS) and Geographical Information Systems (GIS) in disease surveys and reporting is becoming increasingly routine, enabling a better understanding of spatial epidemiology and the improvement of surveillance and control strategies. In turn, the greater availability of spatially referenced epidemiological data is driving the rapid expansion of disease mapping and spatial modeling methods, which are becoming increasingly detailed and sophisticated, with rigorous handling of uncertainties. This expansion has, however, not been matched by advancements in the development of spatial datasets of human population distribution that accompany disease maps or spatial models. Where risks are heterogeneous across population groups or space or dependent on transmission between individuals, spatial data on human population distributions and demographic structures are required to estimate infectious disease risks, burdens, and dynamics. The disease impact in terms of morbidity, mortality, and speed of spread varies substantially with demographic profiles, so that identifying the most exposed or affected populations becomes a key aspect of planning and targeting interventions. Subnational breakdowns of population counts by age and sex are routinely collected during national censuses and maintained in finer detail within microcensus data. Moreover, demographic and health surveys continue to collect representative and contemporary samples from clusters of communities in low-income countries where census data may be less detailed and not collected regularly. Together, these freely available datasets form a rich resource for quantifying and understanding the spatial variations in the sizes and distributions of those most at risk of disease in low income regions, yet at present, they remain unconnected data scattered across national statistical offices and websites. In this paper we discuss the deficiencies of existing spatial population datasets and their limitations on epidemiological analyses. We review sources of detailed, contemporary, freely available and relevant spatial demographic data focusing on low income regions where such data are often sparse and highlight the value of incorporating these through a set of examples of their application in disease studies. Moreover, the importance of acknowledging, measuring, and accounting for uncertainty in spatial demographic datasets is outlined. Finally, a strategy for building an open-access database of spatial demographic data that is tailored to epidemiological applications is put forward.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 16 May 2012
Keywords: population, epidemiology, demography, disease mapping
Organisations: University of Southampton, PHEW – P (Population Health)

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 344456
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/344456
PURE UUID: 6c65cd3b-e91a-485a-855a-7846624788ec
ORCID for A.J. Tatem: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7270-941X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Oct 2012 16:35
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: A.J. Tatem ORCID iD
Author: S. Adamo
Author: N. Bharti
Author: C.R. Burgert
Author: M. Castro
Author: A. Dorelien
Author: G. Fink
Author: C. Linard
Author: J. Mendelsohn
Author: L. Montana
Author: M.R. Montgomery
Author: A. Nelson
Author: A.M. Noor
Author: D. Pindolia
Author: G. Yetman
Author: D. Balk

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×