The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Ethnicity as a determining factor for instrumental support in mid and later life in England and Wales

Ethnicity as a determining factor for instrumental support in mid and later life in England and Wales
Ethnicity as a determining factor for instrumental support in mid and later life in England and Wales
Objectives. Minority ethnic groups are often assumed to exchange higher levels of informal support than the majority population, despite evidence that controlling for socioeconomic and health inequalities eliminates differences. Using a unique data set from England and Wales, we examined instrumental support across ethnic groups in mid and later life.
Method. Employing data from the Home Office Citizenship Survey 2005 (N = 14,081), we investigated ethnic group differences in instrumental support among people aged 55 and older in England and Wales (n = 4,710). Multiple logistic regression was used to investigate the determinants of support given and received, guided by the Andersen–Newman behavioral model.
Results. Compared with the White British group, the Indian group reported significantly higher odds (odds ratio [OR] = 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0–4.7) of receiving instrumental support from household members but significantly lower odds of giving support to relatives outside the household (OR = 0.7, 95% CI 0.5–0.9). Three other ethnic groups (Pakistani and Bangladeshi, Mixed, Other) reported significantly lower odds in unadjusted findings, but when adjusted, ethnic group differences were no longer significant.
Discussion. Our analyses suggest few ethnic group differences in instrumental support once need and enabling factors were taken into account. Such findings are contrary to the belief that minority groups exchange more informal support and therefore have less need for formal services. The Andersen–Newman model is useful for guiding the analysis of support both given and received.
1079-5014
278-289
Willis, Rosalind
dd2e5e10-58bf-44ca-9c04-f355f3af26ba
Price, Debora
95753d10-fd8e-4233-b003-cf21b775ca75
Glaser, Karen
ea795669-9fc7-4d54-b941-5ba2bab3de04
Willis, Rosalind
dd2e5e10-58bf-44ca-9c04-f355f3af26ba
Price, Debora
95753d10-fd8e-4233-b003-cf21b775ca75
Glaser, Karen
ea795669-9fc7-4d54-b941-5ba2bab3de04

Willis, Rosalind, Price, Debora and Glaser, Karen (2013) Ethnicity as a determining factor for instrumental support in mid and later life in England and Wales. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68 (2), 278-289. (doi:10.1093/geronb/gbs160).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives. Minority ethnic groups are often assumed to exchange higher levels of informal support than the majority population, despite evidence that controlling for socioeconomic and health inequalities eliminates differences. Using a unique data set from England and Wales, we examined instrumental support across ethnic groups in mid and later life.
Method. Employing data from the Home Office Citizenship Survey 2005 (N = 14,081), we investigated ethnic group differences in instrumental support among people aged 55 and older in England and Wales (n = 4,710). Multiple logistic regression was used to investigate the determinants of support given and received, guided by the Andersen–Newman behavioral model.
Results. Compared with the White British group, the Indian group reported significantly higher odds (odds ratio [OR] = 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0–4.7) of receiving instrumental support from household members but significantly lower odds of giving support to relatives outside the household (OR = 0.7, 95% CI 0.5–0.9). Three other ethnic groups (Pakistani and Bangladeshi, Mixed, Other) reported significantly lower odds in unadjusted findings, but when adjusted, ethnic group differences were no longer significant.
Discussion. Our analyses suggest few ethnic group differences in instrumental support once need and enabling factors were taken into account. Such findings are contrary to the belief that minority groups exchange more informal support and therefore have less need for formal services. The Andersen–Newman model is useful for guiding the analysis of support both given and received.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2013
Organisations: Gerontology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 345973
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/345973
ISSN: 1079-5014
PURE UUID: 51a7ddc1-32e5-41d0-a6dc-136dd69a47a3
ORCID for Rosalind Willis: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6687-5799

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Dec 2012 12:19
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:38

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Rosalind Willis ORCID iD
Author: Debora Price
Author: Karen Glaser

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×