The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The comparative clinical course of pregnant and non-pregnant women hospitalised with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infection

The comparative clinical course of pregnant and non-pregnant women hospitalised with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infection
The comparative clinical course of pregnant and non-pregnant women hospitalised with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infection
Introduction: The Influenza Clinical Information Network (FLU-CIN) was established to gather detailed clinical and epidemiological information about patients with laboratory confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 infection in UK hospitals. This report focuses on the clinical course and outcomes of infection in pregnancy.

Methods: A standardised data extraction form was used to obtain detailed clinical information from hospital case notes and electronic records, for patients with PCR-confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 infection admitted to 13 sentinel hospitals in five clinical 'hubs' and a further 62 non-sentinel hospitals, between 11th May 2009 and 31st January 2010.Outcomes were compared for pregnant and non-pregnant women aged 15-44 years, using univariate and multivariable techniques.

Results: Of the 395 women aged 15-44 years, 82 (21%) were pregnant; 73 (89%) in the second or third trimester. Pregnant women were significantly less likely to exhibit severe respiratory distress at initial assessment (OR?=?0.49 (95% CI: 0.30-0.82)), require supplemental oxygen on admission (OR?=?0.40 (95% CI: 0.20-0.80)), or have underlying co-morbidities (p-trend <0.001). However, they were equally likely to be admitted to high dependency (Level 2) or intensive care (Level 3) and/or to die, after adjustment for potential confounders (adj. OR?=?0.93 (95% CI: 0.46-1.92). Of 11 pregnant women needing Level 2/3 care, 10 required mechanical ventilation and three died.

Conclusions: Since the expected prevalence of pregnancy in the source population was 6%, our data suggest that pregnancy greatly increased the likelihood of hospital admission with A(H1N1)pdm09. Pregnant women were less likely than non-pregnant women to have respiratory distress on admission, but severe outcomes were equally likely in both groups.
1932-6203
e41638
Dolan, Gayle P.
42f0171d-67dd-4a46-bfb0-ecbe29360025
Myles, Puja R.
123c952c-b5b3-47bf-8e67-1d50bb40b114
Brett, Stephen J.
24863e86-fb61-428d-bac6-b517912145b2
Enstone, Joanne E.
1e6488d9-b4ac-4c9c-9cd8-dd66e663752f
Read, Robert C.
b5caca7b-0063-438a-b703-7ecbb6fc2b51
Openshaw, Peter J.M.
43fb682a-04c9-4fc2-8404-674823f966a3
Semple, Malcolm G.
15b207df-e044-4078-9b40-1af17b800ab1
Lim, Wei Shen
89d4ce8c-fbc7-4f56-940e-e4c6533af05d
Taylor, Bruce L.
c955af0e-2cfa-4a12-aadf-0178260e5b9d
McMenamin, James
d152729c-4145-4ee1-8fe2-838ae5f02604
Nicholson, Karl G.
27948033-015f-4e4f-a8ed-1df896b42b0a
Bannister, Barbara
1e81bb1d-6896-4478-9b66-40081712072f
Nguyen-Van-Tam, Jonathan S.
1aac2164-f614-4c82-87f9-e123817bf128
Dolan, Gayle P.
42f0171d-67dd-4a46-bfb0-ecbe29360025
Myles, Puja R.
123c952c-b5b3-47bf-8e67-1d50bb40b114
Brett, Stephen J.
24863e86-fb61-428d-bac6-b517912145b2
Enstone, Joanne E.
1e6488d9-b4ac-4c9c-9cd8-dd66e663752f
Read, Robert C.
b5caca7b-0063-438a-b703-7ecbb6fc2b51
Openshaw, Peter J.M.
43fb682a-04c9-4fc2-8404-674823f966a3
Semple, Malcolm G.
15b207df-e044-4078-9b40-1af17b800ab1
Lim, Wei Shen
89d4ce8c-fbc7-4f56-940e-e4c6533af05d
Taylor, Bruce L.
c955af0e-2cfa-4a12-aadf-0178260e5b9d
McMenamin, James
d152729c-4145-4ee1-8fe2-838ae5f02604
Nicholson, Karl G.
27948033-015f-4e4f-a8ed-1df896b42b0a
Bannister, Barbara
1e81bb1d-6896-4478-9b66-40081712072f
Nguyen-Van-Tam, Jonathan S.
1aac2164-f614-4c82-87f9-e123817bf128

Dolan, Gayle P., Myles, Puja R., Brett, Stephen J., Enstone, Joanne E., Read, Robert C., Openshaw, Peter J.M., Semple, Malcolm G., Lim, Wei Shen, Taylor, Bruce L., McMenamin, James, Nicholson, Karl G., Bannister, Barbara and Nguyen-Van-Tam, Jonathan S. (2012) The comparative clinical course of pregnant and non-pregnant women hospitalised with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infection. PLoS ONE, 7 (8), e41638. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041638). (PMID:22870239)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction: The Influenza Clinical Information Network (FLU-CIN) was established to gather detailed clinical and epidemiological information about patients with laboratory confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 infection in UK hospitals. This report focuses on the clinical course and outcomes of infection in pregnancy.

Methods: A standardised data extraction form was used to obtain detailed clinical information from hospital case notes and electronic records, for patients with PCR-confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 infection admitted to 13 sentinel hospitals in five clinical 'hubs' and a further 62 non-sentinel hospitals, between 11th May 2009 and 31st January 2010.Outcomes were compared for pregnant and non-pregnant women aged 15-44 years, using univariate and multivariable techniques.

Results: Of the 395 women aged 15-44 years, 82 (21%) were pregnant; 73 (89%) in the second or third trimester. Pregnant women were significantly less likely to exhibit severe respiratory distress at initial assessment (OR?=?0.49 (95% CI: 0.30-0.82)), require supplemental oxygen on admission (OR?=?0.40 (95% CI: 0.20-0.80)), or have underlying co-morbidities (p-trend <0.001). However, they were equally likely to be admitted to high dependency (Level 2) or intensive care (Level 3) and/or to die, after adjustment for potential confounders (adj. OR?=?0.93 (95% CI: 0.46-1.92). Of 11 pregnant women needing Level 2/3 care, 10 required mechanical ventilation and three died.

Conclusions: Since the expected prevalence of pregnancy in the source population was 6%, our data suggest that pregnancy greatly increased the likelihood of hospital admission with A(H1N1)pdm09. Pregnant women were less likely than non-pregnant women to have respiratory distress on admission, but severe outcomes were equally likely in both groups.

Other
fetchObject.action_uri=info_doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0041638&representation=PDF - Version of Record
Available under License Other.
Download (93kB)

More information

Published date: 3 August 2012
Organisations: Clinical & Experimental Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 346732
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/346732
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: 4e8e0ad0-a0b4-4702-a790-f2c7cf9a3f17
ORCID for Robert C. Read: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4297-6728

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Jan 2013 14:24
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:42

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Gayle P. Dolan
Author: Puja R. Myles
Author: Stephen J. Brett
Author: Joanne E. Enstone
Author: Robert C. Read ORCID iD
Author: Peter J.M. Openshaw
Author: Malcolm G. Semple
Author: Wei Shen Lim
Author: Bruce L. Taylor
Author: James McMenamin
Author: Karl G. Nicholson
Author: Barbara Bannister
Author: Jonathan S. Nguyen-Van-Tam

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×