The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Flume experiments on turbulent flows across gaps of permeable and impermeable boundaries

Flume experiments on turbulent flows across gaps of permeable and impermeable boundaries
Flume experiments on turbulent flows across gaps of permeable and impermeable boundaries
Laser Doppler anemometery and laser-induced fluorescence techniques were used to explore the spatial structure of the flow within and above finite cavities created within porous and solid media. The cavities within these two configurations were identical in size and were intended to mimic flow disturbances created by finite gaps and forest clearing. Because flows over permeable boundaries differ from their solid counterparts, the study here addresses how these differences in boundary conditions produce differences in, (i) bulk flow properties including the mean vorticity within and adjacent to the gaps, (ii) second-order statistics such as the standard deviations and turbulent stresses, (iii) the relative importance of advective to turbulent stress terms across various regions within and above the gaps, and (iv) the local imbalance between ejections and sweeps and momentum transport efficiencies of updrafts and downdrafts. Both configurations exhibited a primary recirculation zone of comparable dimensions inside the gap. The mean vorticity spawned at the upstream corner of the gap was more intense for the solid configuration when compared to its porous counterpart. The free-shear layer spawned from the upstream corner-edge deeper into the gap for the porous configuration. The momentum flux at the interface within and above the gap was enhanced by a factor of 1.5–2.0 over its upstream value, and this enhancement zone was much broader in size for the porous configuration. For the turbulent transport terms in the longitudinal and vertical mean momentum balances, these transport terms were significant inside the gap for both boundary configurations when compared to their upstream counterpart. The effectiveness of using incomplete cumulant expansion methods to describe the momentum transport efficiencies, and the relative contributions of ejections and sweeps to turbulent stresses, especially in this zone, were also demonstrated. The flatness factor for both velocity components, often used as a measure of intermittency, was highest in the vicinity of the upstream corner in both configurations. However, immediately following the downstream corner, the flatness factor remained large for the porous configuration, in contrast to its solid configuration counterpart.
0006-8314
21-39
Fontan, Stefano
28548372-d329-4b80-8e00-6c484708178e
Katul, Gabriel
a7f3c557-0168-42c3-8e53-3e88679bafd0
Poggi, Davide
a08e7c7f-4710-4b8b-99a5-b10074f5bb73
Manes, Costantino
7d9d5123-4d1b-4760-beff-d82fe0bd0acf
Ridolfi, Luca
09adf2f1-6957-4253-bff1-4674406ceae6
Fontan, Stefano
28548372-d329-4b80-8e00-6c484708178e
Katul, Gabriel
a7f3c557-0168-42c3-8e53-3e88679bafd0
Poggi, Davide
a08e7c7f-4710-4b8b-99a5-b10074f5bb73
Manes, Costantino
7d9d5123-4d1b-4760-beff-d82fe0bd0acf
Ridolfi, Luca
09adf2f1-6957-4253-bff1-4674406ceae6

Fontan, Stefano, Katul, Gabriel, Poggi, Davide, Manes, Costantino and Ridolfi, Luca (2013) Flume experiments on turbulent flows across gaps of permeable and impermeable boundaries. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 147 (1), 21-39. (doi:10.1007/s10546-012-9772-z).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Laser Doppler anemometery and laser-induced fluorescence techniques were used to explore the spatial structure of the flow within and above finite cavities created within porous and solid media. The cavities within these two configurations were identical in size and were intended to mimic flow disturbances created by finite gaps and forest clearing. Because flows over permeable boundaries differ from their solid counterparts, the study here addresses how these differences in boundary conditions produce differences in, (i) bulk flow properties including the mean vorticity within and adjacent to the gaps, (ii) second-order statistics such as the standard deviations and turbulent stresses, (iii) the relative importance of advective to turbulent stress terms across various regions within and above the gaps, and (iv) the local imbalance between ejections and sweeps and momentum transport efficiencies of updrafts and downdrafts. Both configurations exhibited a primary recirculation zone of comparable dimensions inside the gap. The mean vorticity spawned at the upstream corner of the gap was more intense for the solid configuration when compared to its porous counterpart. The free-shear layer spawned from the upstream corner-edge deeper into the gap for the porous configuration. The momentum flux at the interface within and above the gap was enhanced by a factor of 1.5–2.0 over its upstream value, and this enhancement zone was much broader in size for the porous configuration. For the turbulent transport terms in the longitudinal and vertical mean momentum balances, these transport terms were significant inside the gap for both boundary configurations when compared to their upstream counterpart. The effectiveness of using incomplete cumulant expansion methods to describe the momentum transport efficiencies, and the relative contributions of ejections and sweeps to turbulent stresses, especially in this zone, were also demonstrated. The flatness factor for both velocity components, often used as a measure of intermittency, was highest in the vicinity of the upstream corner in both configurations. However, immediately following the downstream corner, the flatness factor remained large for the porous configuration, in contrast to its solid configuration counterpart.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2013
Organisations: Water & Environmental Engineering Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 346887
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/346887
ISSN: 0006-8314
PURE UUID: 98bb86aa-259d-4a5c-9861-71e29227ee54

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Jan 2013 11:25
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 12:42

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Stefano Fontan
Author: Gabriel Katul
Author: Davide Poggi
Author: Costantino Manes
Author: Luca Ridolfi

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×