The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Low seismic velocities below mid-ocean ridges: Attenuation versus melt retention

Low seismic velocities below mid-ocean ridges: Attenuation versus melt retention
Low seismic velocities below mid-ocean ridges: Attenuation versus melt retention
The first comprehensive seismic experiment sampling subridge mantle revealed a pronounced low-velocity zone between 40 and 100 km depth below the East Pacific Rise (EPR) that has been attributed to substantial retained melt fractions of 0.3–2%. Such high melt fractions are at odds with low melt productivity and high melt mobility inferred from petrology and geochemistry. Here, we evaluate whether seismic attenuation can reconcile subridge seismic structure with low melt fractions. We start from a dynamic spreading model which includes melt generation and migration and is converted into seismic structure, accounting for temperature-, pressure-, composition-, phase-, and melt-dependent anharmonicity, and temperature-, pressure-, frequency- and hydration-dependent anelasticity. Our models predict a double low-velocity zone: a shallow—approximately triangular—region due to dry melting, and a low-velocity channel between 60 and 150 km depth dominantly controlled by solid state high-temperature seismic attenuation in a damp mantle, with only a minor contribution of (<0.1%) melt. We test how tomographic inversion influences the imaging of our modeled shear velocity features. The EPR experiment revealed a double low-velocity zone, but most tomographic studies would only resolve the deeper velocity minimum. Experimentally constrained anelasticity formulations produce VSas low as observed and can explain lateral variations in near-ridge asthenospheric VS with ±100 K temperature variations and/or zero to high water content. Furthermore, such QS formulations also reproduce low asthenospheric VS below older oceans and continents from basic lithospheric cooling models. Although these structures are compatible with global QS images, they are more attenuating than permitted by EPR data.
asthenosphere, geodynamic model, melt, mid-ocean ridge, seismic attenuation, seismic velocity
0148-0227
B12403
Goes, Saskia
8da1004a-3f5b-44c9-9889-046c5b6c537e
Armitage, John
7fd8780f-3267-427b-a8f8-3252f73bb197
Harmon, Nick
10d11a16-b8b0-4132-9354-652e72d8e830
Smith, Hannah
0721c050-bb0c-4b40-acc4-a65c07e1817a
Huismans, Ritske
d0111913-1d0d-4578-be89-573030b99cdc
Goes, Saskia
8da1004a-3f5b-44c9-9889-046c5b6c537e
Armitage, John
7fd8780f-3267-427b-a8f8-3252f73bb197
Harmon, Nick
10d11a16-b8b0-4132-9354-652e72d8e830
Smith, Hannah
0721c050-bb0c-4b40-acc4-a65c07e1817a
Huismans, Ritske
d0111913-1d0d-4578-be89-573030b99cdc

Goes, Saskia, Armitage, John, Harmon, Nick, Smith, Hannah and Huismans, Ritske (2012) Low seismic velocities below mid-ocean ridges: Attenuation versus melt retention. Journal of Geophysical Research, 117 (B12), B12403. (doi:10.1029/2012JB009637).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The first comprehensive seismic experiment sampling subridge mantle revealed a pronounced low-velocity zone between 40 and 100 km depth below the East Pacific Rise (EPR) that has been attributed to substantial retained melt fractions of 0.3–2%. Such high melt fractions are at odds with low melt productivity and high melt mobility inferred from petrology and geochemistry. Here, we evaluate whether seismic attenuation can reconcile subridge seismic structure with low melt fractions. We start from a dynamic spreading model which includes melt generation and migration and is converted into seismic structure, accounting for temperature-, pressure-, composition-, phase-, and melt-dependent anharmonicity, and temperature-, pressure-, frequency- and hydration-dependent anelasticity. Our models predict a double low-velocity zone: a shallow—approximately triangular—region due to dry melting, and a low-velocity channel between 60 and 150 km depth dominantly controlled by solid state high-temperature seismic attenuation in a damp mantle, with only a minor contribution of (<0.1%) melt. We test how tomographic inversion influences the imaging of our modeled shear velocity features. The EPR experiment revealed a double low-velocity zone, but most tomographic studies would only resolve the deeper velocity minimum. Experimentally constrained anelasticity formulations produce VSas low as observed and can explain lateral variations in near-ridge asthenospheric VS with ±100 K temperature variations and/or zero to high water content. Furthermore, such QS formulations also reproduce low asthenospheric VS below older oceans and continents from basic lithospheric cooling models. Although these structures are compatible with global QS images, they are more attenuating than permitted by EPR data.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2012
Keywords: asthenosphere, geodynamic model, melt, mid-ocean ridge, seismic attenuation, seismic velocity
Organisations: Geology & Geophysics

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 347522
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/347522
ISSN: 0148-0227
PURE UUID: dd25ddd5-2fc7-41ab-8595-ab3226956057
ORCID for Nick Harmon: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0731-768X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Jan 2013 10:13
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:33

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Saskia Goes
Author: John Armitage
Author: Nick Harmon ORCID iD
Author: Hannah Smith
Author: Ritske Huismans

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×