The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Search for two categories of target produces fewer fixations to target-color items

Search for two categories of target produces fewer fixations to target-color items
Search for two categories of target produces fewer fixations to target-color items
Searching simultaneously for metal threats (guns and knives) and improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in X-ray images is less effective than 2 independent single-target searches, 1 for metal threats and 1 for IEDs. The goals of this study were to (a) replicate this dual-target cost for categorical targets and to determine whether the cost remains when X-ray images overlap, (b) determine the role of attentional guidance in this dual-target cost by measuring eye movements, and (c) determine the effect of practice on guidance. Untrained participants conducted 5,376 trials of visual search of X-ray images, each specializing in single-target search for metal threats, single-target search for IEDs, or dual-target search for both. In dual-target search, only 1 target (metal threat or IED) at most appeared on any 1 trial. Eye movements, response time, and accuracy were compared across single-target and dual-target searches. Results showed a dual-target cost in response time, accuracy, and guidance, with fewer fixations to target-color objects and disproportionately more to non-target-color objects, compared with single-target search. Such reduction in guidance explains why targets are missed in dual-target search, which was particularly noticeable when objects overlapped. After extensive practice, accuracy, response time, and guidance remained better in single-target search than in dual-target search. The results indicate that, when 2 different target representations are required for search, both representations cannot be maintained as accurately as in separate single-target searches. They suggest that baggage X-ray security screeners should specialize in one type of threat, or be trained to conduct 2 independent searches, 1 for each threat item.
1076-898X
404-418
Menneer, T.
d684eaf6-1494-4004-9973-cb8ccc628efa
Stroud, Michael, J.
6b73466a-82db-4418-88e1-76ff4fc31d12
Cave, Kyle R.
38f1020d-3cf6-4165-b462-4d9efd448790
Li, Xingshan
e49f2ca9-3388-4e93-9b40-c57e125f221a
Godwin, H.J.
df22dc0c-01d1-440a-a369-a763801851e5
Liversedge, Simon P.
3ebda3f3-d930-4f89-85d5-5654d8fe7dee
Donnelly, Nick
05c83b6b-ee8d-4c9d-85dc-c5dcd6b5427b
Menneer, T.
d684eaf6-1494-4004-9973-cb8ccc628efa
Stroud, Michael, J.
6b73466a-82db-4418-88e1-76ff4fc31d12
Cave, Kyle R.
38f1020d-3cf6-4165-b462-4d9efd448790
Li, Xingshan
e49f2ca9-3388-4e93-9b40-c57e125f221a
Godwin, H.J.
df22dc0c-01d1-440a-a369-a763801851e5
Liversedge, Simon P.
3ebda3f3-d930-4f89-85d5-5654d8fe7dee
Donnelly, Nick
05c83b6b-ee8d-4c9d-85dc-c5dcd6b5427b

Menneer, T., Stroud, Michael, J., Cave, Kyle R., Li, Xingshan, Godwin, H.J., Liversedge, Simon P. and Donnelly, Nick (2012) Search for two categories of target produces fewer fixations to target-color items. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18 (4), 404-418. (doi:10.1037/a0031032). (PMID:23294283)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Searching simultaneously for metal threats (guns and knives) and improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in X-ray images is less effective than 2 independent single-target searches, 1 for metal threats and 1 for IEDs. The goals of this study were to (a) replicate this dual-target cost for categorical targets and to determine whether the cost remains when X-ray images overlap, (b) determine the role of attentional guidance in this dual-target cost by measuring eye movements, and (c) determine the effect of practice on guidance. Untrained participants conducted 5,376 trials of visual search of X-ray images, each specializing in single-target search for metal threats, single-target search for IEDs, or dual-target search for both. In dual-target search, only 1 target (metal threat or IED) at most appeared on any 1 trial. Eye movements, response time, and accuracy were compared across single-target and dual-target searches. Results showed a dual-target cost in response time, accuracy, and guidance, with fewer fixations to target-color objects and disproportionately more to non-target-color objects, compared with single-target search. Such reduction in guidance explains why targets are missed in dual-target search, which was particularly noticeable when objects overlapped. After extensive practice, accuracy, response time, and guidance remained better in single-target search than in dual-target search. The results indicate that, when 2 different target representations are required for search, both representations cannot be maintained as accurately as in separate single-target searches. They suggest that baggage X-ray security screeners should specialize in one type of threat, or be trained to conduct 2 independent searches, 1 for each threat item.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: December 2012

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 347556
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/347556
ISSN: 1076-898X
PURE UUID: 2fd94a24-11b3-4e1e-ba10-36007b140218
ORCID for H.J. Godwin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0005-1232-500X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Jan 2013 11:11
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:34

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: T. Menneer
Author: Michael, J. Stroud
Author: Kyle R. Cave
Author: Xingshan Li
Author: H.J. Godwin ORCID iD
Author: Simon P. Liversedge
Author: Nick Donnelly

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×