The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

On the influence of soft tissue coverage in the determination of bone kinematics using skin markers

On the influence of soft tissue coverage in the determination of bone kinematics using skin markers
On the influence of soft tissue coverage in the determination of bone kinematics using skin markers
Accurate measurement of underlying bone positions is important for the understanding of normal movement and function, as well as for addressing clinical musculoskeletal or post-injury problems. Non-invasive measurement techniques are limited by the analysis technique and movement of peripheral soft tissues that can introduce significant measurement errors in reproducing the kinematics of the underlying bones when using external skin markers. Reflective markers, skeletally mounted to the right hind limb of three Merino-mix sheep were measured simultaneously with markers attached to the skin of each segment, during repetitions of gait trials. The movement of the skin markers relative to the underlying bone positions was then assessed using the Point Cluster Technique (PCT), raw averaging and the Optimal Common Shape Technique (OCST), a new approach presented in this manuscript. Errors in the position of the proximal joint centre, predicted from the corresponding skin markers, were shown to be phasic and strongly associated with the amount soft tissue coverage, averaging 8.5 mm for the femur, 2.8 for the tibia and 2.0 for the metatarsus. Although the results show a better prediction of bone kinematics associated with the Optimal Common Shape Technique, these errors were large for all three assessment techniques and much greater than the differences between the various techniques. Whilst individual markers moved up to 4 mm from the optimal marker set configuration, average peak errors of up to 16, 5 and 3 mm (hip, knee and metatarso-phalangeal joints respectively) were observed, suggesting that a large amount of kinematic noise is produced from the synchronous shifting of marker sets as a result of underlying muscle firing and the inertial effects of heel impact. Current techniques are therefore limited in their ability to determine the kinematics of underlying bones based on skin markers, particularly in segments with more pronounced soft tissue coverage.
skin markers, bone positions, musculoskeletal kinematics
0736-0266
726-734
Taylor, William R.
1ed48ef6-e396-40f5-8434-6c0628c9d3ca
Ehrig, Rainald M.
039b8e91-4867-4a1b-8b73-0381c6411d40
Duda, Georg N.
ac4e207b-3e2e-4c84-a6c4-cb67531f890b
Schell, Hanna
8fb2a511-e2bb-4193-8cd3-19387eb344ec
Seebeck, Petra
7e5420ec-c8b8-4934-87e6-5339420aa782
Heller, Markus O.
3da19d2a-f34d-4ff1-8a34-9b5a7e695829
Taylor, William R.
1ed48ef6-e396-40f5-8434-6c0628c9d3ca
Ehrig, Rainald M.
039b8e91-4867-4a1b-8b73-0381c6411d40
Duda, Georg N.
ac4e207b-3e2e-4c84-a6c4-cb67531f890b
Schell, Hanna
8fb2a511-e2bb-4193-8cd3-19387eb344ec
Seebeck, Petra
7e5420ec-c8b8-4934-87e6-5339420aa782
Heller, Markus O.
3da19d2a-f34d-4ff1-8a34-9b5a7e695829

Taylor, William R., Ehrig, Rainald M., Duda, Georg N., Schell, Hanna, Seebeck, Petra and Heller, Markus O. (2005) On the influence of soft tissue coverage in the determination of bone kinematics using skin markers. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 23 (4), 726-734. (doi:10.1016/j.orthres.2005.02.006).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Accurate measurement of underlying bone positions is important for the understanding of normal movement and function, as well as for addressing clinical musculoskeletal or post-injury problems. Non-invasive measurement techniques are limited by the analysis technique and movement of peripheral soft tissues that can introduce significant measurement errors in reproducing the kinematics of the underlying bones when using external skin markers. Reflective markers, skeletally mounted to the right hind limb of three Merino-mix sheep were measured simultaneously with markers attached to the skin of each segment, during repetitions of gait trials. The movement of the skin markers relative to the underlying bone positions was then assessed using the Point Cluster Technique (PCT), raw averaging and the Optimal Common Shape Technique (OCST), a new approach presented in this manuscript. Errors in the position of the proximal joint centre, predicted from the corresponding skin markers, were shown to be phasic and strongly associated with the amount soft tissue coverage, averaging 8.5 mm for the femur, 2.8 for the tibia and 2.0 for the metatarsus. Although the results show a better prediction of bone kinematics associated with the Optimal Common Shape Technique, these errors were large for all three assessment techniques and much greater than the differences between the various techniques. Whilst individual markers moved up to 4 mm from the optimal marker set configuration, average peak errors of up to 16, 5 and 3 mm (hip, knee and metatarso-phalangeal joints respectively) were observed, suggesting that a large amount of kinematic noise is produced from the synchronous shifting of marker sets as a result of underlying muscle firing and the inertial effects of heel impact. Current techniques are therefore limited in their ability to determine the kinematics of underlying bones based on skin markers, particularly in segments with more pronounced soft tissue coverage.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: July 2005
Keywords: skin markers, bone positions, musculoskeletal kinematics
Organisations: Bioengineering Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 348509
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/348509
ISSN: 0736-0266
PURE UUID: 15966160-33d8-4428-b9ac-e20b4eab4a47
ORCID for Markus O. Heller: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7879-1135

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Feb 2013 12:58
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: William R. Taylor
Author: Rainald M. Ehrig
Author: Georg N. Duda
Author: Hanna Schell
Author: Petra Seebeck

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×