Worldwide open access: UK leadership?
Worldwide open access: UK leadership?
The web is destined to become humankind's cognitive commons, where digital knowledge is jointly created and freely shared. The UK has been a leader in the global movement toward open access (OA) to research but recently its leadership has been derailed by the joint influence of the publishing industry lobby from without and well-intentioned but premature and unhelpful over-reaching from within the OA movement itself. The result has been the extremely counterproductive ‘Finch Report’ followed by a new draft of the Research Councils UK (RCUK) OA mandate, downgrading the role of cost-free OA self-archiving of research publications (‘green OA’) in favor of paying subscription publishers over and above subscriptions, out of scarce research funds, in exchange for making single articles OA (‘hybrid gold OA’). The motivation of the new policy is to reform publication and to gain certain re-use rights (CC-BY), but the likely effect would be researcher resistance, very little OA and a waste of research funds. There is still time to fix the RCUK mandate and restore the UK's leadership by taking a few very specific steps to clarify and strengthen the green component by adding a mechanism for monitoring and verifying compliance, with consequences for non-compliance, along lines also being adopted in the EC and the US.
open access, Finch Report, RCUK Mandate, Green OA, Gold OA, institutional repositories
14-21
Harnad, Stevan
442ee520-71a1-4283-8e01-106693487d8b
March 2013
Harnad, Stevan
442ee520-71a1-4283-8e01-106693487d8b
Abstract
The web is destined to become humankind's cognitive commons, where digital knowledge is jointly created and freely shared. The UK has been a leader in the global movement toward open access (OA) to research but recently its leadership has been derailed by the joint influence of the publishing industry lobby from without and well-intentioned but premature and unhelpful over-reaching from within the OA movement itself. The result has been the extremely counterproductive ‘Finch Report’ followed by a new draft of the Research Councils UK (RCUK) OA mandate, downgrading the role of cost-free OA self-archiving of research publications (‘green OA’) in favor of paying subscription publishers over and above subscriptions, out of scarce research funds, in exchange for making single articles OA (‘hybrid gold OA’). The motivation of the new policy is to reform publication and to gain certain re-use rights (CC-BY), but the likely effect would be researcher resistance, very little OA and a waste of research funds. There is still time to fix the RCUK mandate and restore the UK's leadership by taking a few very specific steps to clarify and strengthen the green component by adding a mechanism for monitoring and verifying compliance, with consequences for non-compliance, along lines also being adopted in the EC and the US.
Text
Harnad_Insights26_1_2.pdf
- Version of Record
Text
fulltext.html
- Version of Record
Image
INSIGHTS-26-14-f002.gif
- Version of Record
Image
INSIGHTS-26-14-f001.gif
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: March 2013
Keywords:
open access, Finch Report, RCUK Mandate, Green OA, Gold OA, institutional repositories
Organisations:
Web & Internet Science
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 349406
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/349406
ISSN: 1177-3901
PURE UUID: ae17dd23-1606-430d-ae05-6d41075ae525
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Mar 2013 12:11
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:48
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Stevan Harnad
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
