The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

'An irresponsible flow of images’: Berger, Clark and the art of television, 1958-1988

'An irresponsible flow of images’: Berger, Clark and the art of television, 1958-1988
'An irresponsible flow of images’: Berger, Clark and the art of television, 1958-1988
John Berger and Mike Dibb’s four-part 1972 BBC2 series Ways of Seeing is a landmark in British arts broadcasting: an polemical essay in deconstruction intended to clear the ground on which a truly ‘public’ art and criticism would subsequently be built. Although its format and style were very different, it was widely interpreted as a Marxist riposte to an equally renowned series, Kenneth Clark's Civilisation (1969). This essay considers this creative dialogue between Berger and Clark, reconstructing a personal as well as intellectual relationship. At first glance the pair seem opposites, with Clark at the centre of the postwar cultural Establishment and Berger on the fringes. Along with such questions of patronage this essay considers the ways in which Berger and Clark understood landscape, the nude and television itself. It argues that Berger’s puritanism and particularism may have prevented the series from achieving Berger’s ultimate goal: a more participatory public for the arts. If this was a failure, however, responsibility lies largely with admirers’ misinterpretation of the series. They made Berger’s means into an end in itself
9004306129
Rodopi
Conlin, Jonathan
3ab58a7d-d74b-48d9-99db-1ba2f3aada40
Hertel, Ralf
Conlin, Jonathan
3ab58a7d-d74b-48d9-99db-1ba2f3aada40
Hertel, Ralf

Conlin, Jonathan (2015) 'An irresponsible flow of images’: Berger, Clark and the art of television, 1958-1988. In, Hertel, Ralf (ed.) Telling Stories: About John Berger. Amsterdam, NL. Rodopi.

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

John Berger and Mike Dibb’s four-part 1972 BBC2 series Ways of Seeing is a landmark in British arts broadcasting: an polemical essay in deconstruction intended to clear the ground on which a truly ‘public’ art and criticism would subsequently be built. Although its format and style were very different, it was widely interpreted as a Marxist riposte to an equally renowned series, Kenneth Clark's Civilisation (1969). This essay considers this creative dialogue between Berger and Clark, reconstructing a personal as well as intellectual relationship. At first glance the pair seem opposites, with Clark at the centre of the postwar cultural Establishment and Berger on the fringes. Along with such questions of patronage this essay considers the ways in which Berger and Clark understood landscape, the nude and television itself. It argues that Berger’s puritanism and particularism may have prevented the series from achieving Berger’s ultimate goal: a more participatory public for the arts. If this was a failure, however, responsibility lies largely with admirers’ misinterpretation of the series. They made Berger’s means into an end in itself

Text
MandarinMarxist.doc - Author's Original
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 14 September 2015
Organisations: History

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 350729
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/350729
ISBN: 9004306129
PURE UUID: ad79d9e6-9347-410a-85c2-d5884600c483
ORCID for Jonathan Conlin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0394-4931

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Apr 2013 08:55
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:27

Export record

Contributors

Author: Jonathan Conlin ORCID iD
Editor: Ralf Hertel

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×