The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Population and antenatal-based HIV prevalence estimates in a high contracepting female population in rural South Africa

Population and antenatal-based HIV prevalence estimates in a high contracepting female population in rural South Africa
Population and antenatal-based HIV prevalence estimates in a high contracepting female population in rural South Africa
Background
To present and compare population-based and antenatal-care (ANC) sentinel surveillance HIV prevalence estimates among women in a rural South African population where both provision of ANC services and family planning is prevalent and fertility is declining. With a need, in such settings, to understand how to appropriately adjust ANC sentinel surveillance estimates to represent HIV prevalence in general populations, and with evidence of possible biases inherent to both surveillance systems, we explore differences between the two systems. There is particular emphasis on unrepresentative selection of ANC clinics and unrepresentative testing in the population.

Methods
HIV sero-prevalence amongst blood samples collected from women consenting to test during the 2005 annual longitudinal population-based serological survey was compared to anonymous unlinked HIV sero-prevalence amongst women attending antenatal care (ANC) first visits in six clinics (January to May 2005). Both surveillance systems were conducted as part of the Africa Centre Demographic Information System.

Results
Population-based HIV prevalence estimates for all women (25.2%) and pregnant women (23.7%) were significantly lower than that for ANC attendees (37.7%). A large proportion of women attending urban or peri-urban clinics would be predicted to be resident within rural areas. Although overall estimates remained significantly different, presenting and standardising estimates by age and location (clinic for ANC-based estimates and individual-residence for population-based estimates) made some group-specific estimates from the two surveillance systems more predictive of one another.

Conclusion
It is likely that where ANC coverage and contraceptive use is widespread and fertility is low, population-based surveillance under-estimates HIV prevalence due to unrepresentative testing by age, residence and also probably by HIV status, and that ANC sentinel surveillance over-estimates prevalence due to selection bias in terms of age of sexual debut and contraceptive use. The results presented highlight the importance of accounting for unrepresentative testing, particularly by individual residence and age, through system design and statistical analyses.
1471-2458
160
Rice, Brian D.
edc9ed34-7916-41ec-9339-164e065a7d62
Bätzing-Feigenbaum, Jörg
80a0a2c5-9237-4f1e-a49f-bcad9ba6e8f3
Hosegood, Victoria
c59a89d5-5edc-42dd-b282-f44458fd2993
Tanser, Frank
a7112c48-809b-4f7c-8662-eaef445891f4
Hill, Caterina
e3490c23-a6bd-4a20-aab7-6cae77557960
Barnighausen, Till
f99001d2-60f1-4447-b554-b01dca4b4c5e
Herbst, Kobus
fab67269-11ef-4c52-91bc-635b00065504
Welz, Tanya
1a87edf5-45a1-4ba1-a8b8-f4a53de00d30
Newell, Marie-Louise
c6ff99dd-c23b-4fef-a846-a221fe2522b3
Rice, Brian D.
edc9ed34-7916-41ec-9339-164e065a7d62
Bätzing-Feigenbaum, Jörg
80a0a2c5-9237-4f1e-a49f-bcad9ba6e8f3
Hosegood, Victoria
c59a89d5-5edc-42dd-b282-f44458fd2993
Tanser, Frank
a7112c48-809b-4f7c-8662-eaef445891f4
Hill, Caterina
e3490c23-a6bd-4a20-aab7-6cae77557960
Barnighausen, Till
f99001d2-60f1-4447-b554-b01dca4b4c5e
Herbst, Kobus
fab67269-11ef-4c52-91bc-635b00065504
Welz, Tanya
1a87edf5-45a1-4ba1-a8b8-f4a53de00d30
Newell, Marie-Louise
c6ff99dd-c23b-4fef-a846-a221fe2522b3

Rice, Brian D., Bätzing-Feigenbaum, Jörg, Hosegood, Victoria, Tanser, Frank, Hill, Caterina, Barnighausen, Till, Herbst, Kobus, Welz, Tanya and Newell, Marie-Louise (2007) Population and antenatal-based HIV prevalence estimates in a high contracepting female population in rural South Africa. BMC Public Health, 7, 160. (doi:10.1186/1471-2458-7-160). (PMID:17640354)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background
To present and compare population-based and antenatal-care (ANC) sentinel surveillance HIV prevalence estimates among women in a rural South African population where both provision of ANC services and family planning is prevalent and fertility is declining. With a need, in such settings, to understand how to appropriately adjust ANC sentinel surveillance estimates to represent HIV prevalence in general populations, and with evidence of possible biases inherent to both surveillance systems, we explore differences between the two systems. There is particular emphasis on unrepresentative selection of ANC clinics and unrepresentative testing in the population.

Methods
HIV sero-prevalence amongst blood samples collected from women consenting to test during the 2005 annual longitudinal population-based serological survey was compared to anonymous unlinked HIV sero-prevalence amongst women attending antenatal care (ANC) first visits in six clinics (January to May 2005). Both surveillance systems were conducted as part of the Africa Centre Demographic Information System.

Results
Population-based HIV prevalence estimates for all women (25.2%) and pregnant women (23.7%) were significantly lower than that for ANC attendees (37.7%). A large proportion of women attending urban or peri-urban clinics would be predicted to be resident within rural areas. Although overall estimates remained significantly different, presenting and standardising estimates by age and location (clinic for ANC-based estimates and individual-residence for population-based estimates) made some group-specific estimates from the two surveillance systems more predictive of one another.

Conclusion
It is likely that where ANC coverage and contraceptive use is widespread and fertility is low, population-based surveillance under-estimates HIV prevalence due to unrepresentative testing by age, residence and also probably by HIV status, and that ANC sentinel surveillance over-estimates prevalence due to selection bias in terms of age of sexual debut and contraceptive use. The results presented highlight the importance of accounting for unrepresentative testing, particularly by individual residence and age, through system design and statistical analyses.

Text
AC_ANC paper.pdf - Version of Record
Download (641kB)

More information

Published date: 18 July 2007
Organisations: Social Statistics & Demography

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 351457
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/351457
ISSN: 1471-2458
PURE UUID: d4e250a3-1f40-441c-a37c-0c1d2dc141df
ORCID for Victoria Hosegood: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2244-2518
ORCID for Marie-Louise Newell: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1074-7699

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 May 2013 13:50
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:47

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Brian D. Rice
Author: Jörg Bätzing-Feigenbaum
Author: Frank Tanser
Author: Caterina Hill
Author: Till Barnighausen
Author: Kobus Herbst
Author: Tanya Welz

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×