The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The key actor: a qualitative study of patient participation in the handover process in Europe

The key actor: a qualitative study of patient participation in the handover process in Europe
The key actor: a qualitative study of patient participation in the handover process in Europe
Background: Patient safety experts have postulated thatincreasing patient participation in communications duringpatient handovers will improve the quality of patienttransitions, and that this may reduce hospital readmissions.Choosing strategies that enhance patient safety throughimproved handovers requires better understanding ofpatient experiences and preferences for participation.Objective: The aim of this paper is to explore the patients’experiences and perspectives related to the handoversbetween their primary care providers and the inpatienthospital.Methods: A qualitative secondary analysis was performed,based on individual and focus group patient interviews with90 patients in five European countries.Results: The analysis revealed three themes: patientpositioning in the handover process; prerequisites forpatient participation and patient preferences for thehandover process. Patients’ participation ranged from beingthe key actor, to sharing the responsibility with healthcareprofessional(s), to being passive participants. For activeparticipation patients required both personal and socialresources as well as prerequisites such as information andrespect. Some patients preferred to be the key actor incharge; others preferred their healthcare professionals to bethe key actors in the handover.Conclusions: Patients’ participation is related to thehealthcare system, the activity of healthcare professionals’and patients’ capacity for participation. Patients prefer ahandover process where the responsibility is clear andunambiguous. Healthcare organisations need a clear andwell-considered system of responsibility for handoverprocesses, that takes into account the individual patient’sneed of clarity, and support in relation to his/hers ownrecourses.
2044-5415
i89-i96
Flink, M.
53a3fd2a-6dde-497d-9a2a-b287dc2375fe
Hesselink, G.
4156a7fb-a6b3-4ba8-bddd-7394c22b0f32
Pijnenborg, L.
e9d3e87a-8218-411d-97b7-b812c53594a0
Wollersheim, H.
5e67270e-394d-41b8-b2c3-d0c7d14f00e7
Vernooij-Dassen, M.
c1923cc4-6d57-4d0a-8810-e90ba35279e1
Barach, P.
69ad6a57-8f9c-4a35-af61-f147784a09a1
Dudzik-Urbaniak, E.
01d9b37f-414c-4318-97c5-39f8cb4e8eed
Orrego, C.
a314325b-7259-44f3-b58e-4ed33b0e06c0
Toccafondi, G.
437fc7c3-f754-4c20-b55f-59c6f1ee456e
Schoonhoven, Lisette
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
Gademan, P.
36e1600c-cf99-4c2d-a1cd-ea3b96d089cc
Ohlen, G.
1f8d9c3b-0236-40a4-b47d-40ce75be18cb
Hansagi, H.
c9c8ecc2-6f20-48a8-8392-d63825e5dfb9
Olsson, M.
c8c03eaa-49eb-41c1-a64c-7637b23c5e2b
Flink, M.
53a3fd2a-6dde-497d-9a2a-b287dc2375fe
Hesselink, G.
4156a7fb-a6b3-4ba8-bddd-7394c22b0f32
Pijnenborg, L.
e9d3e87a-8218-411d-97b7-b812c53594a0
Wollersheim, H.
5e67270e-394d-41b8-b2c3-d0c7d14f00e7
Vernooij-Dassen, M.
c1923cc4-6d57-4d0a-8810-e90ba35279e1
Barach, P.
69ad6a57-8f9c-4a35-af61-f147784a09a1
Dudzik-Urbaniak, E.
01d9b37f-414c-4318-97c5-39f8cb4e8eed
Orrego, C.
a314325b-7259-44f3-b58e-4ed33b0e06c0
Toccafondi, G.
437fc7c3-f754-4c20-b55f-59c6f1ee456e
Schoonhoven, Lisette
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
Gademan, P.
36e1600c-cf99-4c2d-a1cd-ea3b96d089cc
Ohlen, G.
1f8d9c3b-0236-40a4-b47d-40ce75be18cb
Hansagi, H.
c9c8ecc2-6f20-48a8-8392-d63825e5dfb9
Olsson, M.
c8c03eaa-49eb-41c1-a64c-7637b23c5e2b

Flink, M., Hesselink, G., Pijnenborg, L., Wollersheim, H., Vernooij-Dassen, M., Barach, P., Dudzik-Urbaniak, E., Orrego, C., Toccafondi, G., Schoonhoven, Lisette, Gademan, P., Ohlen, G., Hansagi, H. and Olsson, M. (2012) The key actor: a qualitative study of patient participation in the handover process in Europe. BMJ Quality and Safety, 21, i89-i96. (doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001171).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Patient safety experts have postulated thatincreasing patient participation in communications duringpatient handovers will improve the quality of patienttransitions, and that this may reduce hospital readmissions.Choosing strategies that enhance patient safety throughimproved handovers requires better understanding ofpatient experiences and preferences for participation.Objective: The aim of this paper is to explore the patients’experiences and perspectives related to the handoversbetween their primary care providers and the inpatienthospital.Methods: A qualitative secondary analysis was performed,based on individual and focus group patient interviews with90 patients in five European countries.Results: The analysis revealed three themes: patientpositioning in the handover process; prerequisites forpatient participation and patient preferences for thehandover process. Patients’ participation ranged from beingthe key actor, to sharing the responsibility with healthcareprofessional(s), to being passive participants. For activeparticipation patients required both personal and socialresources as well as prerequisites such as information andrespect. Some patients preferred to be the key actor incharge; others preferred their healthcare professionals to bethe key actors in the handover.Conclusions: Patients’ participation is related to thehealthcare system, the activity of healthcare professionals’and patients’ capacity for participation. Patients prefer ahandover process where the responsibility is clear andunambiguous. Healthcare organisations need a clear andwell-considered system of responsibility for handoverprocesses, that takes into account the individual patient’sneed of clarity, and support in relation to his/hers ownrecourses.

Text
Flink Patient participation 2012.pdf - Other
Download (216kB)

More information

Published date: 2012
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 351740
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/351740
ISSN: 2044-5415
PURE UUID: e61ea02e-3ca1-44dd-9480-dfc091a8b343
ORCID for Lisette Schoonhoven: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7129-3766

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Apr 2013 13:56
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:41

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: M. Flink
Author: G. Hesselink
Author: L. Pijnenborg
Author: H. Wollersheim
Author: M. Vernooij-Dassen
Author: P. Barach
Author: E. Dudzik-Urbaniak
Author: C. Orrego
Author: G. Toccafondi
Author: P. Gademan
Author: G. Ohlen
Author: H. Hansagi
Author: M. Olsson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×