The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

L1 transfer revisited: the L2 acquisition of telicity in English by Spanish and Slavic native speakers

L1 transfer revisited: the L2 acquisition of telicity in English by Spanish and Slavic native speakers
L1 transfer revisited: the L2 acquisition of telicity in English by Spanish and Slavic native speakers
This paper investigates the claim that the native grammar of the learners is the initial state of second-language acquisition, as far as the acquisition of universal grammar parameters is concerned. Two opposing views on L1 transfer are discussed: the first hypothesis maintains that learners start outwith the L1 parameter value (Schwartz and Sprouse’s 1994, 1996 full-transfer/full-access hypothesis), while the second hypothesis argues that L1 transfer plays a minimal role in the acquisition process (Epstein et al.1996’s no-transfer/full-access hypothesis). The parameter under investigation is the aspect parameter, postulating two different ways in which languages mark telicity in the verbal phrase. In order to distinguish betweenthe two views of transfer with experimental means, the study examines the competence of two groups of low-intermediate learners of English, native speakers of Spanish, a language sharing the same parameter value with English, and of Bulgarian, a language exhibiting the opposite parametric value. Results indicate that the differences in the performance of learners from the two language groups are directly traceable to their native language. Thus the full-transfer/full-access hypothesis receives experimental support.
0024-3949
739-770
Slabakova, Roumyana
1bda11ce-ce3d-4146-8ae3-4a486b6f5bde
Slabakova, Roumyana
1bda11ce-ce3d-4146-8ae3-4a486b6f5bde

Slabakova, Roumyana (2000) L1 transfer revisited: the L2 acquisition of telicity in English by Spanish and Slavic native speakers. Linguistics, 38 (4), 739-770. (doi:10.1515/ling.2000.004).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This paper investigates the claim that the native grammar of the learners is the initial state of second-language acquisition, as far as the acquisition of universal grammar parameters is concerned. Two opposing views on L1 transfer are discussed: the first hypothesis maintains that learners start outwith the L1 parameter value (Schwartz and Sprouse’s 1994, 1996 full-transfer/full-access hypothesis), while the second hypothesis argues that L1 transfer plays a minimal role in the acquisition process (Epstein et al.1996’s no-transfer/full-access hypothesis). The parameter under investigation is the aspect parameter, postulating two different ways in which languages mark telicity in the verbal phrase. In order to distinguish betweenthe two views of transfer with experimental means, the study examines the competence of two groups of low-intermediate learners of English, native speakers of Spanish, a language sharing the same parameter value with English, and of Bulgarian, a language exhibiting the opposite parametric value. Results indicate that the differences in the performance of learners from the two language groups are directly traceable to their native language. Thus the full-transfer/full-access hypothesis receives experimental support.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2000
Organisations: Modern Languages

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 353572
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/353572
ISSN: 0024-3949
PURE UUID: 59c2647e-ee8a-415c-a2af-622816aac45a
ORCID for Roumyana Slabakova: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5839-460X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Jun 2013 13:24
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:48

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×