The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Measurements of atmospheric aerosol size distributions by co-located optical particle counters

Measurements of atmospheric aerosol size distributions by co-located optical particle counters
Measurements of atmospheric aerosol size distributions by co-located optical particle counters
Ambient aerosol number concentrations and size distributions were measured in both indoor and outdoor environments using two identical co-located and concurrently operated optical particle counters (OPCs). Indoor measurements were performed in a research laboratory, whereas two different locations were used for outdoor measurements; the sampling duration exceeded 12 hours and one hour respectively. Results from the two OPCs have been presented for eight size classes between 0.5 and 20 µm, represented by central value diameters 0.875, 1.5, 2.75, 4.25, 6.25, 8.75, 12.5 and 15 µm. Overall, for the six indoor and outdoor experiments conducted at different times of day, the mean particle count ratios from the two OPCs for the individual samples showed ±20% variation for indoor experiments and ±50% variations for outdoor experiments. Significant random departures of the mean ratios from unity at all size classes were noticed even for indoor sample periods exceeding 20 hours. However, the coefficient of determination (R2) for the plots of readings from the two OPCs indicated higher consistency for “fine” particles (0.5–3.5 µm) than for “coarse” particles (10–20 µm), with average R2 > 0.8 and R2 < 0.5 respectively. Poisson counting statistics help to explain the divergence in the latter case where number concentrations were very low for the outdoor experiments. However, it cannot explain the divergence for indoor measurements where the concentrations were much higher. Increasing the averaging period reduced the scatter, especially in size classes with low number concentration. However, this procedure may lead to over-smoothing of data for environments with rapidly changing number concentration. These results indicate that, when two such analysers are used for comparative studies, the divergence between their responses may generate significant values of source contribution or deposition flux, even for nominally similar aerosol populations.
1464-0325
734-739
Tiwary, Abhishek
f948aa5f-5c42-42b0-8bcb-d8ea5e0d58f8
Colls, Jeremy J.
db25acee-6679-413a-b47d-93f361fc0591
Tiwary, Abhishek
f948aa5f-5c42-42b0-8bcb-d8ea5e0d58f8
Colls, Jeremy J.
db25acee-6679-413a-b47d-93f361fc0591

Tiwary, Abhishek and Colls, Jeremy J. (2004) Measurements of atmospheric aerosol size distributions by co-located optical particle counters. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 6 (9), 734-739. (doi:10.1039/b403363a).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Ambient aerosol number concentrations and size distributions were measured in both indoor and outdoor environments using two identical co-located and concurrently operated optical particle counters (OPCs). Indoor measurements were performed in a research laboratory, whereas two different locations were used for outdoor measurements; the sampling duration exceeded 12 hours and one hour respectively. Results from the two OPCs have been presented for eight size classes between 0.5 and 20 µm, represented by central value diameters 0.875, 1.5, 2.75, 4.25, 6.25, 8.75, 12.5 and 15 µm. Overall, for the six indoor and outdoor experiments conducted at different times of day, the mean particle count ratios from the two OPCs for the individual samples showed ±20% variation for indoor experiments and ±50% variations for outdoor experiments. Significant random departures of the mean ratios from unity at all size classes were noticed even for indoor sample periods exceeding 20 hours. However, the coefficient of determination (R2) for the plots of readings from the two OPCs indicated higher consistency for “fine” particles (0.5–3.5 µm) than for “coarse” particles (10–20 µm), with average R2 > 0.8 and R2 < 0.5 respectively. Poisson counting statistics help to explain the divergence in the latter case where number concentrations were very low for the outdoor experiments. However, it cannot explain the divergence for indoor measurements where the concentrations were much higher. Increasing the averaging period reduced the scatter, especially in size classes with low number concentration. However, this procedure may lead to over-smoothing of data for environments with rapidly changing number concentration. These results indicate that, when two such analysers are used for comparative studies, the divergence between their responses may generate significant values of source contribution or deposition flux, even for nominally similar aerosol populations.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2004
Organisations: Civil Maritime & Env. Eng & Sci Unit

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 354505
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/354505
ISSN: 1464-0325
PURE UUID: d2e03a86-77dd-4d3a-a44e-c6a5a425dcb2

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Aug 2013 09:22
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 14:19

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Abhishek Tiwary
Author: Jeremy J. Colls

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×