The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

An evaluation of two alongshore transport equations with field measurements

An evaluation of two alongshore transport equations with field measurements
An evaluation of two alongshore transport equations with field measurements
The performance of two well-known equations to predict the depth-averaged alongshore suspended sediment flux [Van Rijn, L.C., 1984. Sediment transport, part II: suspended load transport. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 110, 1613–1641; and Bailard, J.A., 1981. An energetics total load sediment transport model for a plane sloping beach. Journal of Geophysical Research 86, 10938–10954] was assessed by comparing predictions with 2306 field estimates based on a vertical stack of three optical backscatter sensors and a single electromagnetic flow meter. The observations were collected at four cross-shore positions on the intertidal beach of Egmond aan Zee, the Netherlands, during calm to storm conditions, with the offshore significant wave height peaking at 3.7 m. Measured hydrodynamics were employed in the computations of both models. Also, default parameter values were used without calibration to the data. We found that both models underpredicted the observations. Overall, the Van Rijn model outperformed the Bailard model, with about 70% of the model prediction lying between 1/5 to 5 of the observations under energetic conditions. For the Bailard model this was only about 20%. The performance of the Van Rijn model is, however, sensitive to the wave-related roughness, one of its highly uncertain free parameters. This may allow for an easy calibration when estimates of the depth-averaged alongshore sediment flux are available but may lead to serious errors in situations without data to constrain the predictions. We suspect that the discrepancy between the observations and model predictions is due to an overestimation of the observed fluxes (high turbidity, air bubbles) and an underestimation of the modeled fluxes because of missing physics related primarily to breaking waves.
longshore suspended sediment flux, field measurements, data-model comparison, van rijn model, bailard model
0378-3839
313-319
van Maanen, B.
47cb6ae2-9baf-4f37-a138-067d72966597
de Ruiter, P.J.
01207ebb-f4a2-4f22-80e6-8dd38c92c235
Ruessink, B.G.
5c18a796-5a3d-4599-8d9c-39ab37b76fa2
van Maanen, B.
47cb6ae2-9baf-4f37-a138-067d72966597
de Ruiter, P.J.
01207ebb-f4a2-4f22-80e6-8dd38c92c235
Ruessink, B.G.
5c18a796-5a3d-4599-8d9c-39ab37b76fa2

van Maanen, B., de Ruiter, P.J. and Ruessink, B.G. (2009) An evaluation of two alongshore transport equations with field measurements. Coastal Engineering, 56 (3), 313-319. (doi:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2008.09.001).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The performance of two well-known equations to predict the depth-averaged alongshore suspended sediment flux [Van Rijn, L.C., 1984. Sediment transport, part II: suspended load transport. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 110, 1613–1641; and Bailard, J.A., 1981. An energetics total load sediment transport model for a plane sloping beach. Journal of Geophysical Research 86, 10938–10954] was assessed by comparing predictions with 2306 field estimates based on a vertical stack of three optical backscatter sensors and a single electromagnetic flow meter. The observations were collected at four cross-shore positions on the intertidal beach of Egmond aan Zee, the Netherlands, during calm to storm conditions, with the offshore significant wave height peaking at 3.7 m. Measured hydrodynamics were employed in the computations of both models. Also, default parameter values were used without calibration to the data. We found that both models underpredicted the observations. Overall, the Van Rijn model outperformed the Bailard model, with about 70% of the model prediction lying between 1/5 to 5 of the observations under energetic conditions. For the Bailard model this was only about 20%. The performance of the Van Rijn model is, however, sensitive to the wave-related roughness, one of its highly uncertain free parameters. This may allow for an easy calibration when estimates of the depth-averaged alongshore sediment flux are available but may lead to serious errors in situations without data to constrain the predictions. We suspect that the discrepancy between the observations and model predictions is due to an overestimation of the observed fluxes (high turbidity, air bubbles) and an underestimation of the modeled fluxes because of missing physics related primarily to breaking waves.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 16 October 2008
Published date: March 2009
Keywords: longshore suspended sediment flux, field measurements, data-model comparison, van rijn model, bailard model
Organisations: Energy & Climate Change Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 354891
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/354891
ISSN: 0378-3839
PURE UUID: 79d82820-7344-4779-886b-2171950b6136

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Aug 2013 15:45
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 14:25

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: B. van Maanen
Author: P.J. de Ruiter
Author: B.G. Ruessink

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×