The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Do high frequency ultrasound images support clinical skin assessment?

Do high frequency ultrasound images support clinical skin assessment?
Do high frequency ultrasound images support clinical skin assessment?
High frequency ultrasound imaging has been reported as a potential method of identifying the suspected tissue damage in patients “at risk” of pressure ulceration. The aim of this study was to explore whether ultrasound images supported the clinical skin assessment in an inpatient population through identification of subcutaneous tissue damage. Skin on the heels and/or sacral coccygeal area of fifty vascular surgery inpatients was assessed clinically by tissue viability nurses and with ultrasound pre operatively and at least every other day until discharge. Images were compared to routine clinical skin assessment outcomes. Qualitative classification of ultrasound images did not match outcomes yielded through the clinical skin assessment. Images corresponding to 16 participants were classified as subgroup 3 damage at the heels (equivalent to grade 2 pressure ulceration); clinical skin assessment rated no heels as greater than grade 1a (blanching erythema). Conversely, all images captured of the sacral coccygeal area were classified as normal; the clinical skin assessment rated two participants as grade 1b (non-blanching erythema). Ultrasound imaging is a potentially useful adjunct to the clinical skin assessment in providing information about the underlying tissue. However, further longitudinal clinical assessment is required to characterise images against actual and “staged” pressure ulceration.
2090-5483
Porter-Armstrong, AP
ba1f7554-e965-4b86-bd3f-a567d18258e9
Adams, C
47237b43-fd2b-4ba9-b82a-034a39e6fa6c
Moorhead, AS
bf6b56a4-39ae-40c5-b3df-1a50f4d86609
Donnelly, J
db55ea5b-4fb0-4cf7-9693-1ac8d93ae541
Nixon, J
f8289e82-b17f-402e-b9d7-26b85f19b84b
Bader, D.L.
9884d4f6-2607-4d48-bf0c-62bdcc0d1dbf
Lyder, C
4d6a47d6-2592-483f-be96-5e2c84907205
Stinson, MD
fdea9e07-1cb6-46dc-a376-e848c3c3891d
Porter-Armstrong, AP
ba1f7554-e965-4b86-bd3f-a567d18258e9
Adams, C
47237b43-fd2b-4ba9-b82a-034a39e6fa6c
Moorhead, AS
bf6b56a4-39ae-40c5-b3df-1a50f4d86609
Donnelly, J
db55ea5b-4fb0-4cf7-9693-1ac8d93ae541
Nixon, J
f8289e82-b17f-402e-b9d7-26b85f19b84b
Bader, D.L.
9884d4f6-2607-4d48-bf0c-62bdcc0d1dbf
Lyder, C
4d6a47d6-2592-483f-be96-5e2c84907205
Stinson, MD
fdea9e07-1cb6-46dc-a376-e848c3c3891d

Porter-Armstrong, AP, Adams, C, Moorhead, AS, Donnelly, J, Nixon, J, Bader, D.L., Lyder, C and Stinson, MD (2013) Do high frequency ultrasound images support clinical skin assessment? ISRN Nursing. (doi:10.1155/2013/314248). (PMID:23509637)

Record type: Article

Abstract

High frequency ultrasound imaging has been reported as a potential method of identifying the suspected tissue damage in patients “at risk” of pressure ulceration. The aim of this study was to explore whether ultrasound images supported the clinical skin assessment in an inpatient population through identification of subcutaneous tissue damage. Skin on the heels and/or sacral coccygeal area of fifty vascular surgery inpatients was assessed clinically by tissue viability nurses and with ultrasound pre operatively and at least every other day until discharge. Images were compared to routine clinical skin assessment outcomes. Qualitative classification of ultrasound images did not match outcomes yielded through the clinical skin assessment. Images corresponding to 16 participants were classified as subgroup 3 damage at the heels (equivalent to grade 2 pressure ulceration); clinical skin assessment rated no heels as greater than grade 1a (blanching erythema). Conversely, all images captured of the sacral coccygeal area were classified as normal; the clinical skin assessment rated two participants as grade 1b (non-blanching erythema). Ultrasound imaging is a potentially useful adjunct to the clinical skin assessment in providing information about the underlying tissue. However, further longitudinal clinical assessment is required to characterise images against actual and “staged” pressure ulceration.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 2013
e-pub ahead of print date: 2013
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 354904
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/354904
ISSN: 2090-5483
PURE UUID: 7af89cb8-5437-44c9-9092-b5c2ee14b7a7
ORCID for D.L. Bader: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1208-3507

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Jul 2013 15:28
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 14:25

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: AP Porter-Armstrong
Author: C Adams
Author: AS Moorhead
Author: J Donnelly
Author: J Nixon
Author: D.L. Bader ORCID iD
Author: C Lyder
Author: MD Stinson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×