The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Pressurissed carbon dioxide as a means of sanitising sewage sludge and improving biogas production

Pressurissed carbon dioxide as a means of sanitising sewage sludge and improving biogas production
Pressurissed carbon dioxide as a means of sanitising sewage sludge and improving biogas production
The research reports on the potential for CO2 pressurisation as a means of enhancing biogas production in the anaerobic digestion of co-settled sewage sludge, a technique reported in the commercial literature as showing great benefits. The possibility of using this technique to reduce the number of faecal indicator bacteria is also explored, as an alternative means of complying with the UK water industry's Safe Sludge Matrix.
Initial research using pure cultures of both E. coli (a strain isolated from sewage sludge) and Salmonella enterica showed that the results from different methods for isolating, recovering, resuscitating and enumerating E. coli were comparable. Further testing using heat stressed and unstressed E. coli showed the advantages of resuscitation and the MPN technique with 2-stage incubation was therefore used in the experiments to maximise the recovery of damaged but viable cells.
The results for pure cultures showed conclusively that under the conditions of time and pressure used CO2 pressurisation and rapid depressurisation could cause irreversible cell damage and loss of viability in both test strains. The effect was reproducible and a time-pressure relationship was established for the apparatus used. It was shown, however, that the sanitising effect was influenced by culture volume, probably as this affected mass transfer of CO2 and hence its penetration into the cells. This finding may limit the practical application of the approach and further work is needed to establish design parameters and develop reactor systems to overcome this issue. Even under the favourable conditions used, exposure times required for 6 log reduction were too long for commercial application. Optimisation of the pressurisation vessel design may improve this and should be a focus of any future investigations.
Batch and semi-continuous anaerobic digestion tests with co-settled sewage sludge were carried out to ascertain the effect of pressurised CO2 treatment on biogas production. These showed conclusively that the treatment did not improve either biogas productivity or specific methane yield. Experimental work also showed that even treatment conditions which gave an 8 log reduction in E. coli in pure culture were ineffective in reducing the number of indigenous E. coli in the sludge, or of S. enterica when added to a sewage sludge matrix. These findings led to further investigation of the effects of the size of pressure vessel and sample used. The results showed that this was an important factor, but could not fully explain the lack of performance in comparison with pure culture. It was concluded that the sludge matrix itself must play a role in protecting the microbial consortia from the effects of pressurised CO2. The exact reasons for this were not discovered but may be due to the effect of dissolved compounds present in the sludge and/or the structure and nature of the sludge flocs themselves.
Mushtaq, Maryam
7046915f-8cea-4281-a3e3-c91e0eba6410
Mushtaq, Maryam
7046915f-8cea-4281-a3e3-c91e0eba6410
Banks, C.J.
5c6c8c4b-5b25-4e37-9058-50fa8d2e926f

Mushtaq, Maryam (2013) Pressurissed carbon dioxide as a means of sanitising sewage sludge and improving biogas production. University of Southampton, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, Doctoral Thesis, 223pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

The research reports on the potential for CO2 pressurisation as a means of enhancing biogas production in the anaerobic digestion of co-settled sewage sludge, a technique reported in the commercial literature as showing great benefits. The possibility of using this technique to reduce the number of faecal indicator bacteria is also explored, as an alternative means of complying with the UK water industry's Safe Sludge Matrix.
Initial research using pure cultures of both E. coli (a strain isolated from sewage sludge) and Salmonella enterica showed that the results from different methods for isolating, recovering, resuscitating and enumerating E. coli were comparable. Further testing using heat stressed and unstressed E. coli showed the advantages of resuscitation and the MPN technique with 2-stage incubation was therefore used in the experiments to maximise the recovery of damaged but viable cells.
The results for pure cultures showed conclusively that under the conditions of time and pressure used CO2 pressurisation and rapid depressurisation could cause irreversible cell damage and loss of viability in both test strains. The effect was reproducible and a time-pressure relationship was established for the apparatus used. It was shown, however, that the sanitising effect was influenced by culture volume, probably as this affected mass transfer of CO2 and hence its penetration into the cells. This finding may limit the practical application of the approach and further work is needed to establish design parameters and develop reactor systems to overcome this issue. Even under the favourable conditions used, exposure times required for 6 log reduction were too long for commercial application. Optimisation of the pressurisation vessel design may improve this and should be a focus of any future investigations.
Batch and semi-continuous anaerobic digestion tests with co-settled sewage sludge were carried out to ascertain the effect of pressurised CO2 treatment on biogas production. These showed conclusively that the treatment did not improve either biogas productivity or specific methane yield. Experimental work also showed that even treatment conditions which gave an 8 log reduction in E. coli in pure culture were ineffective in reducing the number of indigenous E. coli in the sludge, or of S. enterica when added to a sewage sludge matrix. These findings led to further investigation of the effects of the size of pressure vessel and sample used. The results showed that this was an important factor, but could not fully explain the lack of performance in comparison with pure culture. It was concluded that the sludge matrix itself must play a role in protecting the microbial consortia from the effects of pressurised CO2. The exact reasons for this were not discovered but may be due to the effect of dissolved compounds present in the sludge and/or the structure and nature of the sludge flocs themselves.

Text
thesis.pdf - Other
Download (6MB)

More information

Published date: 1 June 2013
Organisations: University of Southampton, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 355975
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/355975
PURE UUID: 4c24e85e-e805-494d-830b-3f2f74e724aa
ORCID for C.J. Banks: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6795-814X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Nov 2013 12:04
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:52

Export record

Contributors

Author: Maryam Mushtaq
Thesis advisor: C.J. Banks ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×