The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Non-steroid agents for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Non-steroid agents for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Non-steroid agents for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Background: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a chronic progressive lung disease with poor outcome and no effective treatment to date. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2003.

Objectives: to assess the efficacy of non-steroid agents in adults with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Search methods: we searched the Cochrane Airways Group Register (30 March 2010), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2010), Ovid MEDLINE to March week 5, 2010, EMBASE to week 13, 2010 and PubMed to April 2010, with additional handsearching, including abstracts of international conferences. We also contacted pharmaceutical companies and researchers in the field.

Selection criteria: randomised studies comparing non-steroid drugs with placebo or steroids in adults with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Data collection and analysis: two authors independently assessed trial quality, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We contacted pharmaceutical companies to obtain missing information, if any. We combined survival outcomes using Peto odds ratios or hazard ratios (HR).

Main results: fifteen trials involving 10 different drugs were included. Two trials enrolling 1156 patients compared interferon gamma-1beta with placebo: interferon gamma-1beta did not significantly improve survival (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.64; P = 0.68). Four trials involving 1155 patients compared pirfenidone with placebo. Three trials, conducted in 1046 patients, provided data on progression-free survival: pirfenidone significantly reduced the risk of disease progression by 30% (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.88, P = 0.002). Data on the effect of pirfenidone on pulmonary function could only be assessed for two studies analysing 314 patients. Forced vital capacity or vital capacity was significantly improved by pirfenidone (mean difference 0.08 L, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.13, P = 0.0006).

Authors' conclusions: based on available data, partly still unpublished, pirfenidone appears to improve progression-free survival and, to a lesser extent, pulmonary function in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. More data are needed on overall survival and quality of life on treatment. From the studies in this review, interferon gamma-1beta has not been shown to affect survival. Other agents evaluated in single studies either failed to provide evidence for a benefit or need to be assessed in larger randomised controlled trials
1469-493X
CD003134.
Spagnolo, P.
dfc6600e-bbca-4678-abc4-6feb243d4fbb
Del Giovane, C.
9f86e08f-7471-4f04-898d-9f25c8b8884b
Luppi, F.
4a386f93-c228-4b1a-bd52-fcccf9fcb880
Cerri, S.
a3dd7b6b-c165-4337-ba85-072c99ed8547
Balduzzi, S.
dd88bf26-2ff6-4b45-a21f-d7f22c655032
Walters, E.H.
58b6aed5-e61f-40d7-b9d4-6b2da4a966cc
D'Amico, R.
088b30d2-395e-4613-8766-e728de5eeb23
Richeldi, L.
47177d9c-731a-49a1-9cc6-4ac8f6bbbf26
Spagnolo, P.
dfc6600e-bbca-4678-abc4-6feb243d4fbb
Del Giovane, C.
9f86e08f-7471-4f04-898d-9f25c8b8884b
Luppi, F.
4a386f93-c228-4b1a-bd52-fcccf9fcb880
Cerri, S.
a3dd7b6b-c165-4337-ba85-072c99ed8547
Balduzzi, S.
dd88bf26-2ff6-4b45-a21f-d7f22c655032
Walters, E.H.
58b6aed5-e61f-40d7-b9d4-6b2da4a966cc
D'Amico, R.
088b30d2-395e-4613-8766-e728de5eeb23
Richeldi, L.
47177d9c-731a-49a1-9cc6-4ac8f6bbbf26

Spagnolo, P., Del Giovane, C., Luppi, F., Cerri, S., Balduzzi, S., Walters, E.H., D'Amico, R. and Richeldi, L. (2010) Non-steroid agents for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 9, CD003134.. (doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003134.pub2). (PMID:20824834)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a chronic progressive lung disease with poor outcome and no effective treatment to date. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2003.

Objectives: to assess the efficacy of non-steroid agents in adults with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Search methods: we searched the Cochrane Airways Group Register (30 March 2010), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2010), Ovid MEDLINE to March week 5, 2010, EMBASE to week 13, 2010 and PubMed to April 2010, with additional handsearching, including abstracts of international conferences. We also contacted pharmaceutical companies and researchers in the field.

Selection criteria: randomised studies comparing non-steroid drugs with placebo or steroids in adults with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Data collection and analysis: two authors independently assessed trial quality, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We contacted pharmaceutical companies to obtain missing information, if any. We combined survival outcomes using Peto odds ratios or hazard ratios (HR).

Main results: fifteen trials involving 10 different drugs were included. Two trials enrolling 1156 patients compared interferon gamma-1beta with placebo: interferon gamma-1beta did not significantly improve survival (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.64; P = 0.68). Four trials involving 1155 patients compared pirfenidone with placebo. Three trials, conducted in 1046 patients, provided data on progression-free survival: pirfenidone significantly reduced the risk of disease progression by 30% (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.88, P = 0.002). Data on the effect of pirfenidone on pulmonary function could only be assessed for two studies analysing 314 patients. Forced vital capacity or vital capacity was significantly improved by pirfenidone (mean difference 0.08 L, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.13, P = 0.0006).

Authors' conclusions: based on available data, partly still unpublished, pirfenidone appears to improve progression-free survival and, to a lesser extent, pulmonary function in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. More data are needed on overall survival and quality of life on treatment. From the studies in this review, interferon gamma-1beta has not been shown to affect survival. Other agents evaluated in single studies either failed to provide evidence for a benefit or need to be assessed in larger randomised controlled trials

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2010
Organisations: Clinical & Experimental Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 356197
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/356197
ISSN: 1469-493X
PURE UUID: 265f8e25-4d5c-4550-8cde-f1e3eeede08f

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Sep 2013 10:18
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 14:45

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: P. Spagnolo
Author: C. Del Giovane
Author: F. Luppi
Author: S. Cerri
Author: S. Balduzzi
Author: E.H. Walters
Author: R. D'Amico
Author: L. Richeldi

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×