The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Paracetamol, poison, and polio: why Boorse’s account of function fails to distinguish health and disease

Paracetamol, poison, and polio: why Boorse’s account of function fails to distinguish health and disease
Paracetamol, poison, and polio: why Boorse’s account of function fails to distinguish health and disease
Christopher Boorse’s Bio Statistical Theory (BST) defines health as the absence of disease, and disease as the adverse departure from normal species functioning. This paper presents a two-pronged problem for this account. First I demonstrate that, in order to accurately account for dynamic physiological functions, Boorse’s account of normal function needs to be modified to index functions against situations. I then demonstrate that if functions are indexed against situations, the BST can no longer account for diseases that result from specific environmental factors. The BST is impaled on either horn of this dilemma and therefore must be dismissed.
0007-0882
241-264
Kingma, Elselijn
24f1e065-3004-452c-868d-9aee3087bf63
Kingma, Elselijn
24f1e065-3004-452c-868d-9aee3087bf63

Kingma, Elselijn (2010) Paracetamol, poison, and polio: why Boorse’s account of function fails to distinguish health and disease. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61 (2), 241-264. (doi:10.1093/bjps/axp034).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Christopher Boorse’s Bio Statistical Theory (BST) defines health as the absence of disease, and disease as the adverse departure from normal species functioning. This paper presents a two-pronged problem for this account. First I demonstrate that, in order to accurately account for dynamic physiological functions, Boorse’s account of normal function needs to be modified to index functions against situations. I then demonstrate that if functions are indexed against situations, the BST can no longer account for diseases that result from specific environmental factors. The BST is impaled on either horn of this dilemma and therefore must be dismissed.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 24 August 2009
Published date: June 2010
Organisations: Philosophy

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 356568
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/356568
ISSN: 0007-0882
PURE UUID: 6e33cde2-f5fc-4b8a-9742-c3a7c4d66038

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Sep 2013 13:49
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 14:50

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×