Self-report measures: an overview of concerns and limitations of questionnaire use in occupational stress research
Self-report measures: an overview of concerns and limitations of questionnaire use in occupational stress research
As is the case with many domains of organisational behaviour, occupational stress research has for many years been characterised by the use of self-report methodologies, in particular the written questionnaire, as the primary means of data collection. Reliance on self-report for the measurement of both dependent and independent variables raises concern about the validity of causal conclusions for a range of reasons, including systematic response distortions, method variance and monomethod bias, and the psychometric properties (reliability and validity) of questionnaire scales. Beyond the immediate features of questionnaires, there is also concern about the context in which self-report measures are used, in terms of the design of studies, as well as the statistical treatment of questionnaire data at the analysis stage. Each of these themes is addressed from the perspective of the occupational stress literature, with a view to highlighting key areas for consideration in relation to planning and interpreting research. It is also suggested that most of these issues have wider relevance in the field of organisational behaviour, namely in those domains which focus on perceptual and attitudinal variables, which could benefit from similar methodological attention.
University of Southampton
Razavi, Tiffani
140ede4d-97b0-47fb-aec5-cbde16473ad8
2001
Razavi, Tiffani
140ede4d-97b0-47fb-aec5-cbde16473ad8
Razavi, Tiffani
(2001)
Self-report measures: an overview of concerns and limitations of questionnaire use in occupational stress research
(Discussion Papers in Accounting and Management Science, 01-175)
Southampton, UK.
University of Southampton
23pp.
Record type:
Monograph
(Discussion Paper)
Abstract
As is the case with many domains of organisational behaviour, occupational stress research has for many years been characterised by the use of self-report methodologies, in particular the written questionnaire, as the primary means of data collection. Reliance on self-report for the measurement of both dependent and independent variables raises concern about the validity of causal conclusions for a range of reasons, including systematic response distortions, method variance and monomethod bias, and the psychometric properties (reliability and validity) of questionnaire scales. Beyond the immediate features of questionnaires, there is also concern about the context in which self-report measures are used, in terms of the design of studies, as well as the statistical treatment of questionnaire data at the analysis stage. Each of these themes is addressed from the perspective of the occupational stress literature, with a view to highlighting key areas for consideration in relation to planning and interpreting research. It is also suggested that most of these issues have wider relevance in the field of organisational behaviour, namely in those domains which focus on perceptual and attitudinal variables, which could benefit from similar methodological attention.
More information
Published date: 2001
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 35712
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/35712
ISSN: 1356-3548
PURE UUID: 2ed924fe-6ca2-4d6e-bde0-2f7831154f90
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 25 May 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:54
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Tiffani Razavi
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics