A comparative analysis of ordinary, conditional, ordered and exploded logic: their impact in determining bias in market or state contingent claims
Johnson, J.E.V. and O'Brien, R. (2006) A comparative analysis of ordinary, conditional, ordered and exploded logic: their impact in determining bias in market or state contingent claims. Southampton, UK, University of Southampton (Discussion Papers in Accounting & Finance). (Submitted)
Download
Full text not available from this repository.
| Item Type: | Monograph (Discussion Paper) |
|---|---|
| Related URLs: | |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD61 Risk Management |
| Divisions: | University Structure - Pre August 2011 > School of Management |
| Item ID: | 35856 |
| Date Deposited: | 12 Jan 2007 |
| Last Modified: | 02 Mar 2012 12:48 |
| Contributors: | Johnson, J.E.V. (Author) O'Brien, R. (Author) |
| Date: | 2006 |
| Status: | Submitted |
| Publisher: | University of Southampton |
| URI: | http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/35856 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
