The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A review of morphing aircraft

A review of morphing aircraft
A review of morphing aircraft
Aircraft wings are a compromise that allows the aircraft to fly at a range of flight conditions, but the performance at each condition is sub-optimal. The ability of a wing surface to change its geometry during flight has interested researchers and designers over the years as this reduces the design compromises required. Morphing is short for metamorphose: however, there is neither an exact definition nor an agreement between the researchers about the type or the extent of the geometrical changes necessary to qualify an aircraft for the title “shape morphing”. Geometrical parameters that can be affected by morphing solutions can be categorized into: planform alteration (span, sweep and chord), out-of-plane transformation (twist, dihedral/gull, spanwise bending) and airfoil adjustment (camber and thickness).
Changing the wing shape or geometry is not new. Historically, morphing solutions always led to penalties in terms of cost, complexity or weight, although in certain circumstances these were overcome by system level benefits. The current trend for highly efficient and “green” aircraft makes such compromises less acceptable, calling for innovative morphing designs able to provide more benefits and fewer drawbacks. Recent developments in “smart” materials may overcome the limitations and enhance the benefits from existing design solutions. The challenge is to design a structure that is capable of withstanding the prescribed loads, but is also able to change its shape: ideally there should be no distinction between the structure and the actuation system. The blending of morphing and smart structures in an integrated approach requires multi-disciplinary thinking from the early development, which significantly increases the overall complexity, even at the preliminary design stage. Morphing is a promising enabling technology for future, next generation aircraft. However, manufacturers and end users are still too skeptical of the benefits to adopt morphing in the near future. Many developed concepts have a technology readiness level that is still very low. The recent explosive growth of satellite services means that UAVs are the technology of choice for many investigations on wing morphing.
This paper presents a review of the state of the art on morphing aircraft and focuses on structural, shape changing morphing concepts for both fixed and rotary wings, with particular reference to active systems. Inflatable solutions have been not considered, and skin issues and challenges are not discussed in detail. Although many interesting concepts have been synthesized, few have progressed to wing tunnel testing, and even fewer have flown. Furthermore, any successful wing morphing system must overcome the weight penalty due to the additional actuation systems.
1045-389X
823-877
Barbarino, S.
11bb1938-8230-47c0-9736-d96a43dfdb56
Bilgen, O.
75ac6a7c-b893-4b0d-a21f-4f6d7f352dfd
Ajaj, R.M.
ff8ce68d-2ba5-449e-83da-f2be54e6d409
Friswell, M.I.
e1f48951-f82e-4301-9a71-e32ce1188b00
Inman, D.J.
2f98cfd0-1f40-4ea1-baba-3104eb866db5
Barbarino, S.
11bb1938-8230-47c0-9736-d96a43dfdb56
Bilgen, O.
75ac6a7c-b893-4b0d-a21f-4f6d7f352dfd
Ajaj, R.M.
ff8ce68d-2ba5-449e-83da-f2be54e6d409
Friswell, M.I.
e1f48951-f82e-4301-9a71-e32ce1188b00
Inman, D.J.
2f98cfd0-1f40-4ea1-baba-3104eb866db5

Barbarino, S., Bilgen, O., Ajaj, R.M., Friswell, M.I. and Inman, D.J. (2011) A review of morphing aircraft. Journal of Intelligent Materials Systems and Structures, 22 (9), 823-877. (doi:10.1177/1045389X11414084).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Aircraft wings are a compromise that allows the aircraft to fly at a range of flight conditions, but the performance at each condition is sub-optimal. The ability of a wing surface to change its geometry during flight has interested researchers and designers over the years as this reduces the design compromises required. Morphing is short for metamorphose: however, there is neither an exact definition nor an agreement between the researchers about the type or the extent of the geometrical changes necessary to qualify an aircraft for the title “shape morphing”. Geometrical parameters that can be affected by morphing solutions can be categorized into: planform alteration (span, sweep and chord), out-of-plane transformation (twist, dihedral/gull, spanwise bending) and airfoil adjustment (camber and thickness).
Changing the wing shape or geometry is not new. Historically, morphing solutions always led to penalties in terms of cost, complexity or weight, although in certain circumstances these were overcome by system level benefits. The current trend for highly efficient and “green” aircraft makes such compromises less acceptable, calling for innovative morphing designs able to provide more benefits and fewer drawbacks. Recent developments in “smart” materials may overcome the limitations and enhance the benefits from existing design solutions. The challenge is to design a structure that is capable of withstanding the prescribed loads, but is also able to change its shape: ideally there should be no distinction between the structure and the actuation system. The blending of morphing and smart structures in an integrated approach requires multi-disciplinary thinking from the early development, which significantly increases the overall complexity, even at the preliminary design stage. Morphing is a promising enabling technology for future, next generation aircraft. However, manufacturers and end users are still too skeptical of the benefits to adopt morphing in the near future. Many developed concepts have a technology readiness level that is still very low. The recent explosive growth of satellite services means that UAVs are the technology of choice for many investigations on wing morphing.
This paper presents a review of the state of the art on morphing aircraft and focuses on structural, shape changing morphing concepts for both fixed and rotary wings, with particular reference to active systems. Inflatable solutions have been not considered, and skin issues and challenges are not discussed in detail. Although many interesting concepts have been synthesized, few have progressed to wing tunnel testing, and even fewer have flown. Furthermore, any successful wing morphing system must overcome the weight penalty due to the additional actuation systems.

Text
Review paper.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (943kB)
Request a copy

More information

Published date: June 2011
Organisations: Aerodynamics & Flight Mechanics Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 358921
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/358921
ISSN: 1045-389X
PURE UUID: 08e8004f-dabf-424c-b540-f660ce340973

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Oct 2013 13:13
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 15:12

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: S. Barbarino
Author: O. Bilgen
Author: R.M. Ajaj
Author: M.I. Friswell
Author: D.J. Inman

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×