The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Informed choice in bowel cancer screening: a qualitative study to explore how adults with lower education use decision aids

Informed choice in bowel cancer screening: a qualitative study to explore how adults with lower education use decision aids
Informed choice in bowel cancer screening: a qualitative study to explore how adults with lower education use decision aids
Background: Offering informed choice in screening is increasingly advocated, but little is known about how evidence-based information about the benefits and harms of screening influences understanding and participation in screening.

Objective:?We aimed to explore how a bowel cancer screening decision aid influenced decision making and screening behaviour among adults with lower education and literacy.

Methods: Twenty-one men and women aged 55-64 years with lower education levels were interviewed about using a decision aid to make their screening decision. Participants were purposively selected to include those who had and had not made an informed choice.

Results: Understanding the purpose of the decision aid was an important factor in whether participants made an informed choice about screening. Participants varied in how they understood and integrated quantitative risk information about the benefits and harms of screening into their decision making; some read it carefully and used it to justify their screening decision, whereas others dismissed it because they were sceptical of it or lacked confidence in their own numeracy ability. Participants' prior knowledge and beliefs about screening influenced how they made sense of the information.

Discussion and conclusions:?Participants valued information that offered them a choice in a non-directive way, but were concerned that it would deter people from screening. Healthcare providers need to be aware that people respond to screening information in diverse ways involving a range of literacy skills and cognitive processes.
1369-6513
Smith, Sian K.
ee5f6382-fa72-445a-8688-356b2d47d681
Kearney, Paul
82d4c4dd-05cb-4c16-9d2d-bf8550596343
Trevena, Lyndal
0eeb2f6f-e14f-4a33-aa2b-ac7922562217
Barratt, Alexandra
d2bb9788-bd83-4971-870d-c651fb660e6e
Nutbeam, Don
352dc808-9160-42e7-8b52-b8cac02ad486
McCaffery, Kirsten J.
54bdb06e-053d-4fad-8c69-0e235a9bfd04
Smith, Sian K.
ee5f6382-fa72-445a-8688-356b2d47d681
Kearney, Paul
82d4c4dd-05cb-4c16-9d2d-bf8550596343
Trevena, Lyndal
0eeb2f6f-e14f-4a33-aa2b-ac7922562217
Barratt, Alexandra
d2bb9788-bd83-4971-870d-c651fb660e6e
Nutbeam, Don
352dc808-9160-42e7-8b52-b8cac02ad486
McCaffery, Kirsten J.
54bdb06e-053d-4fad-8c69-0e235a9bfd04

Smith, Sian K., Kearney, Paul, Trevena, Lyndal, Barratt, Alexandra, Nutbeam, Don and McCaffery, Kirsten J. (2012) Informed choice in bowel cancer screening: a qualitative study to explore how adults with lower education use decision aids. Health Expectations. (doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00780.x). (PMID:22512746)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Offering informed choice in screening is increasingly advocated, but little is known about how evidence-based information about the benefits and harms of screening influences understanding and participation in screening.

Objective:?We aimed to explore how a bowel cancer screening decision aid influenced decision making and screening behaviour among adults with lower education and literacy.

Methods: Twenty-one men and women aged 55-64 years with lower education levels were interviewed about using a decision aid to make their screening decision. Participants were purposively selected to include those who had and had not made an informed choice.

Results: Understanding the purpose of the decision aid was an important factor in whether participants made an informed choice about screening. Participants varied in how they understood and integrated quantitative risk information about the benefits and harms of screening into their decision making; some read it carefully and used it to justify their screening decision, whereas others dismissed it because they were sceptical of it or lacked confidence in their own numeracy ability. Participants' prior knowledge and beliefs about screening influenced how they made sense of the information.

Discussion and conclusions:?Participants valued information that offered them a choice in a non-directive way, but were concerned that it would deter people from screening. Healthcare providers need to be aware that people respond to screening information in diverse ways involving a range of literacy skills and cognitive processes.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 19 April 2012
Organisations: Faculty of Social, Human and Mathematical Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 359814
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/359814
ISSN: 1369-6513
PURE UUID: a3b2fbe1-62fc-4b45-a745-8dd08f84db83

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Nov 2013 14:23
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 15:29

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sian K. Smith
Author: Paul Kearney
Author: Lyndal Trevena
Author: Alexandra Barratt
Author: Don Nutbeam
Author: Kirsten J. McCaffery

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×