Interlaboratory comparison of boron isotope analyses of boric acid, seawater and marine CaCO3 by MC-ICPMS and NTIMS

Foster, Gavin L., Hönisch, Bärbel, Paris, Guillaume, Dwyer, Gary S., Rae, James W.B., Elliott, Tim, Gaillardet, Jérôme, Hemming, N. Gary, Louvat, Pascale and Vengosh, Avner (2013) Interlaboratory comparison of boron isotope analyses of boric acid, seawater and marine CaCO3 by MC-ICPMS and NTIMS. Chemical Geology, 358, 1-14. (doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.08.027).

Abstract

In this study we make the first attempt to inter-calibrate boron isotope (?11B) measurements on marine biogenic carbonates measured by four different laboratories, each using a different analytical technique. The importance of such calibrations lies in the major implications of relatively small changes in ?11B (< 2‰), which are typical of palaeoclimate applications of the ?11B-pH proxy. Despite the variety of mass spectrometric techniques used by the different laboratories in this study (two variants of negative ion thermal ionisation mass spectrometry and two variants of multicollector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry), for samples without a complex sample matrix, such as boric acid, there are no significant interlaboratory biases: the pooled 2sd of these samples is 0.39‰, which is within the measurement uncertainties reported by each laboratory (which range between 0.18 and 0.80‰). For seawater, a common in-house reference material, we find a similarly good agreement (?11B = 39.65 ± 0.41‰, 2sd) despite four different sample preparation procedures. Reported ?11B for calcium carbonate samples have a pooled 2sd of 1.46‰, which is larger than the measurement uncertainty reported by each laboratory. We have attempted to identify the source of this interlaboratory variability, and find that overall sample size (in terms of available B) and B/Ca ratio (i.e. amount of boron relative to matrix) may play a role, but the exact mechanisms remain uncertain. Observed variations in reported ?11B for the CaCO3 samples are, however, relatively systematic for each laboratory for a given sample matrix (i.e. similar B/Ca and amount of boron for analysis). This implies that relative differences in ?11B in a sample set of a given matrix can be reconstructed by the four laboratories involved in this study more accurately than the absolute boron isotope ratios.

This record has no associated files available for download.

Contributors

Author: Gavin L. Foster

Download statistics