Gurnani, Chitra, Hector, Andrew L., Jager, E., Levason, William, Pugh, David and Reid, Gillian (2013) Tin(ii) fluoride vs. tin(ii) chloride – a comparison of their coordination chemistry with neutral ligands. Dalton Transactions, 42 (23), 8364-8374. (doi:10.1039/c3dt50743b). (PMID:23615730)
Abstract
Reaction of SnF2 in MeOH with the appropriate neutral N- or O-donor ligands produces [SnF(2,2?-bipy)]2SnF6, [SnF(1,10-phen)]2SnF4 and [SnF2(L)] L = Me3PO, dmso or pyNO). The X-ray structures of [SnF(2,2?-bipy)]2SnF6, [SnF(1,10-phen)]2SnF4 and [SnF2(dmso)], reveal trigonal pyramidal Sn(II) cores with longer fluorine bridges completing distorted 5- or 6-coordination. Attempts to prepare SnF2 adducts with various phosphine or diphosphine ligands in MeCN failed, whilst in CH2Cl2 solution complex reactions involving the solvent occurred. The NHC, 1,3-(2,6-di-isopropylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene (IDiPP) and SnF2 produced the imidazolium salt, [IDiPPH]SnF3, the crystal structure of which revealed the first example of a discrete trifluorostannate(II) ion. In contrast, diphosphine complexes of tin(II) chloride formed readily, including [SnCl2{Me2P(CH2)2PMe2}], [SnCl2{o-C6H4(PMe2)2}], [SnCl2{o-C6H4(PPh2)2}] and [(SnCl2)2(?-Ph2P(CH2)2PPh2)], which were characterised by X-ray crystallography. The structures of [SnCl2{Me2P(CH2)2PMe2}] and [SnCl2{o-C6H4(PMe2)2}] reveal chloride-bridged dimers, but [SnCl2{o-C6H4(PPh2)2}], although also dimeric, has very asymmetric diphosphine coordination best described as ?1. The structures of [(SnCl2)2(?-Ph2P(CH2)2PPh2)] and of [SnCl{o-C6H4(AsMe2)2}]SnCl3 reveal trigonal pyramidal cores, but with longer SnCl bridges affording polymeric structures. The synthesis of [SnCl2(R3EO)2] (R = Ph, E = P or As; and R = Me, E = P) are also reported, along with the structure of [SnCl2(Me3PO)2], which contains distorted tetragonal pyramidal Sn(II) coordination. X-ray structures are also reported for [(PMe3)2CH2][SnCl3]2 and [Ph2P(H)(CH2)2P(H)Ph2][SnCl3]2, obtained as by-products from the attempts to synthesise phosphine complexes, as well as [(o-C6H4(PMe2)2CH2]I2. All complexes were characterised by microanalysis, IR and multinuclear NMR spectroscopy (1H, 19F{1H}, 31P{1H } and, where solubility allowed, 119Sn). Comparisons are drawn with corresponding Sn(IV) and Ge(II) complexes
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Identifiers
Catalogue record
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.