The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Comparing brain activation associated with isolated upper and lower limb movement across corresponding joints

Comparing brain activation associated with isolated upper and lower limb movement across corresponding joints
Comparing brain activation associated with isolated upper and lower limb movement across corresponding joints
It was shown recently that functional activation across brain motor areas during locomotion and foot movements are similar but differ substantially from activation related to upper extremity movement (Miyai [2001]: Neuroimage 14:1186–1192). The activation pattern may be a function of the behavioral context of the movement rather than of its mechanical properties. We compare motor system activation patterns associated with isolated single-joint movement of corresponding joints in arm and leg carried out in equal frequency and range. Eleven healthy volunteers underwent BOLD-weighted fMRI while performing repetitive elbow or knee extension/flexion. To relate elbow and knee activation to the well-described patterns of finger movement, serial finger-to-thumb opposition was assessed in addition. After identifying task-related voxels using statistical parametric mapping, activation was measured in five regions of interest (ROI; primary motor [M1] and somatosensory cortex [S1], premotor cortex, supplementary motor area [SMA] divided into preSMA and SMA-proper, and cerebellum). Differences in the degree of activation across ROIs were found between elbow and knee movement. SMA-proper activation was prominent for knee, but almost absent for elbow movement (P < 0.05); finger movement produced small but constant SMA-proper activation. Ipsilateral M1 activation was detected during knee and finger movement, but was absent for the elbow task (P < 0.05). Knee movement showed less lateralization in M1 and S1 than other tasks (P < 0.05). The data demonstrate that central motor structures contribute differently to isolated elbow and knee movement. Activation during knee movement shows similarities to gait-related activation patterns
1065-9471
131-140
Luft, Andreas R.
7d63411e-0ae7-4b6b-9455-b43ba702238c
Smith, Gerald V.
628e692d-7c60-4129-9a6f-ca18b5d2daf6
Forrester, Larry
f4cb091c-9475-40df-a515-0207765cecf9
Whitall, Jill
9761aefb-be80-4270-bc1f-0e726399376e
Macko, Richard F.
facb5e9c-e881-4d59-90d4-1a41509db2fe
Hauser, Till-Karsten
a47234c7-9d56-4992-bf1c-c64d90d69386
Goldberg, Andrew P.
13b56fdc-e27b-4ab2-87ad-17099f34ddc3
Hanley, Daniel F.
eedff09c-b115-4f05-bd76-012397e1adbd
Luft, Andreas R.
7d63411e-0ae7-4b6b-9455-b43ba702238c
Smith, Gerald V.
628e692d-7c60-4129-9a6f-ca18b5d2daf6
Forrester, Larry
f4cb091c-9475-40df-a515-0207765cecf9
Whitall, Jill
9761aefb-be80-4270-bc1f-0e726399376e
Macko, Richard F.
facb5e9c-e881-4d59-90d4-1a41509db2fe
Hauser, Till-Karsten
a47234c7-9d56-4992-bf1c-c64d90d69386
Goldberg, Andrew P.
13b56fdc-e27b-4ab2-87ad-17099f34ddc3
Hanley, Daniel F.
eedff09c-b115-4f05-bd76-012397e1adbd

Luft, Andreas R., Smith, Gerald V., Forrester, Larry, Whitall, Jill, Macko, Richard F., Hauser, Till-Karsten, Goldberg, Andrew P. and Hanley, Daniel F. (2002) Comparing brain activation associated with isolated upper and lower limb movement across corresponding joints. Human Brain Mapping, 17 (2), 131-140. (doi:10.1002/hbm.10058). (PMID:12353246)

Record type: Article

Abstract

It was shown recently that functional activation across brain motor areas during locomotion and foot movements are similar but differ substantially from activation related to upper extremity movement (Miyai [2001]: Neuroimage 14:1186–1192). The activation pattern may be a function of the behavioral context of the movement rather than of its mechanical properties. We compare motor system activation patterns associated with isolated single-joint movement of corresponding joints in arm and leg carried out in equal frequency and range. Eleven healthy volunteers underwent BOLD-weighted fMRI while performing repetitive elbow or knee extension/flexion. To relate elbow and knee activation to the well-described patterns of finger movement, serial finger-to-thumb opposition was assessed in addition. After identifying task-related voxels using statistical parametric mapping, activation was measured in five regions of interest (ROI; primary motor [M1] and somatosensory cortex [S1], premotor cortex, supplementary motor area [SMA] divided into preSMA and SMA-proper, and cerebellum). Differences in the degree of activation across ROIs were found between elbow and knee movement. SMA-proper activation was prominent for knee, but almost absent for elbow movement (P < 0.05); finger movement produced small but constant SMA-proper activation. Ipsilateral M1 activation was detected during knee and finger movement, but was absent for the elbow task (P < 0.05). Knee movement showed less lateralization in M1 and S1 than other tasks (P < 0.05). The data demonstrate that central motor structures contribute differently to isolated elbow and knee movement. Activation during knee movement shows similarities to gait-related activation patterns

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: October 2002
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 361315
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/361315
ISSN: 1065-9471
PURE UUID: fc0957c0-fd97-47e1-b49a-db5e42caa50a

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Jan 2014 11:38
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 15:48

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Andreas R. Luft
Author: Gerald V. Smith
Author: Larry Forrester
Author: Jill Whitall
Author: Richard F. Macko
Author: Till-Karsten Hauser
Author: Andrew P. Goldberg
Author: Daniel F. Hanley

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×