The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Hand dominance and side of stroke affect rehabilitation in chronic stroke

Hand dominance and side of stroke affect rehabilitation in chronic stroke
Hand dominance and side of stroke affect rehabilitation in chronic stroke
Objective: to examine the difference between upper extremity deficits in subjects with left versus right hemispheric lesions at baseline and after bilateral arm training.

Design: a one-way ANOVA was used to detect group differences and a least square means analysis used to determine significance in pre-to-post scores for each group.

Setting: testing was in the Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science Department Research Laboratory, University of Maryland, Baltimore. Training was at the Senior Exercise Rehabilitation Center in the Veterans Administration Hospital, Baltimore.

Subjects: twenty-two (11 left hemispheric lesion, 11 right hemispheric lesion) right-handed subjects with chronic stroke.

Interventions: a six-week nonprogressive repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing (BATRAC).

Main measures: Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Test, Wolf Motor Arm Test, University of Maryland Arm Questionnaire for Stroke (UMAQS), isometric strength and active and passive range of motion for both sides.

Results: no statistical differences were seen at baseline between groups in this sample. Both groups demonstrated improvement after BATRAC in Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Test (change scores of those with left lesions = 5.5; right lesions = 3.6) and UMAQS (change scores of those with left lesions = 5 and right lesions = 2.9). Additionally, patients with left hemispheric lesions but not right lesions made improvements in the Wolf Motor Arm Test (time and weight), in strength measures of paretic elbow flexion, shoulder extension, shoulder abduction and nonparetic wrist flexion, wrist extension and shoulder abduction.

Conclusions: there were no baseline motor function differences between those with left and right hemispheric lesions in this sample. There was a clear training response advantage for patients with left hemispheric lesions after completing six weeks of bilateral arm training. As a result, treatment approaches for upper extremity hemiparesis may need to be more specifically selected based on side of stroke
0269-2155
544-551
McCombe Waller, Sandy
91ffc714-a088-428d-b92c-9b0d70f286da
Whitall, Jill
9761aefb-be80-4270-bc1f-0e726399376e
McCombe Waller, Sandy
91ffc714-a088-428d-b92c-9b0d70f286da
Whitall, Jill
9761aefb-be80-4270-bc1f-0e726399376e

McCombe Waller, Sandy and Whitall, Jill (2005) Hand dominance and side of stroke affect rehabilitation in chronic stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation, 19 (5), 544-551. (doi:10.1191/0269215505cr829oa). (PMID:16119411)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: to examine the difference between upper extremity deficits in subjects with left versus right hemispheric lesions at baseline and after bilateral arm training.

Design: a one-way ANOVA was used to detect group differences and a least square means analysis used to determine significance in pre-to-post scores for each group.

Setting: testing was in the Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science Department Research Laboratory, University of Maryland, Baltimore. Training was at the Senior Exercise Rehabilitation Center in the Veterans Administration Hospital, Baltimore.

Subjects: twenty-two (11 left hemispheric lesion, 11 right hemispheric lesion) right-handed subjects with chronic stroke.

Interventions: a six-week nonprogressive repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing (BATRAC).

Main measures: Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Test, Wolf Motor Arm Test, University of Maryland Arm Questionnaire for Stroke (UMAQS), isometric strength and active and passive range of motion for both sides.

Results: no statistical differences were seen at baseline between groups in this sample. Both groups demonstrated improvement after BATRAC in Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Test (change scores of those with left lesions = 5.5; right lesions = 3.6) and UMAQS (change scores of those with left lesions = 5 and right lesions = 2.9). Additionally, patients with left hemispheric lesions but not right lesions made improvements in the Wolf Motor Arm Test (time and weight), in strength measures of paretic elbow flexion, shoulder extension, shoulder abduction and nonparetic wrist flexion, wrist extension and shoulder abduction.

Conclusions: there were no baseline motor function differences between those with left and right hemispheric lesions in this sample. There was a clear training response advantage for patients with left hemispheric lesions after completing six weeks of bilateral arm training. As a result, treatment approaches for upper extremity hemiparesis may need to be more specifically selected based on side of stroke

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: August 2005
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 361346
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/361346
ISSN: 0269-2155
PURE UUID: 35cacf7a-1e4c-4394-8c45-c07b9adfe1d7

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Jan 2014 15:11
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 15:49

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sandy McCombe Waller
Author: Jill Whitall

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×