The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

On how thin submarine flows transported large volumes of sand for hundreds of kilometres across a flat basin plain without eroding the seafloor

On how thin submarine flows transported large volumes of sand for hundreds of kilometres across a flat basin plain without eroding the seafloor
On how thin submarine flows transported large volumes of sand for hundreds of kilometres across a flat basin plain without eroding the seafloor
Submarine gravity currents, especially long run-out flows that reach the deep ocean, are exceptionally difficult to monitor in action, hence there is a need to reconstruct how these flows behave from their deposits. This study mapped five individual flow deposits (beds) across the Agadir Basin, offshore north-west Africa. This is the only dataset where bed shape, internal distribution of lithofacies, changes in grain size and seafloor gradient, bed volumes, flow thickness and depth of erosion into underlying hemipelagic mud are known for individual beds. Some flows were 30 to 120 m thick. However, flows with the highest fraction of sand were less than 5 to 14 m thick. Sand was most likely to be carried in the lower 5 to 7 m of these flows. Despite being relatively thin, one flow was capable of transporting very large volumes of sediment (ca 200 km3) for large distances across very flat seafloor. These observations show that these relatively thin flows could travel quickly enough on very low gradients (0.02º to 0.05º) to suspend sand several metres to tens of metres above the sea floor, and maintain those speeds for up to 250 km across the basin. Near uniform hemipelagic mud interval thickness between beds, and coccolith assemblages in the mud caps of beds, suggest that the flows did not erode significantly into the underlying seafloor mud. Simple calculations imply that some flows, especially in the proximal part of the basin, were powerful enough to have eroded hemipelagic mud if it was exposed to the flow. This suggests that the flows were depositional from the moment they arrived at a basin plain location, and deposition shielded the underlying hemipelagic mud from erosion. Reproducing the field observations outlined in this exceptionally detailed field dataset is a challenge for future experimental and numerical models.
Deep water, flow thickness, long run-out, mud erosion, quantitative, flow reconstruction, turbidity current, flow processes
0037-0746
1982-2019
Stevenson, Christopher J.
4dd8706f-1d26-437c-95d0-6e131a5ec078
Talling, P.J.
1cbac5ec-a9f8-4868-94fe-6203f30b47cf
Sumner, E.J.
dbba4b92-89cc-45d9-888e-d0e87e5c10ac
Masson, Douglas G.
edd44c8b-38ca-45fb-8d0d-ac8365748a45
Frenz, M.
ef65689d-a1b9-497a-8d20-c05d7a3a6b4d
Wynn, R.B.
72ccd765-9240-45f8-9951-4552b497475a
Stevenson, Christopher J.
4dd8706f-1d26-437c-95d0-6e131a5ec078
Talling, P.J.
1cbac5ec-a9f8-4868-94fe-6203f30b47cf
Sumner, E.J.
dbba4b92-89cc-45d9-888e-d0e87e5c10ac
Masson, Douglas G.
edd44c8b-38ca-45fb-8d0d-ac8365748a45
Frenz, M.
ef65689d-a1b9-497a-8d20-c05d7a3a6b4d
Wynn, R.B.
72ccd765-9240-45f8-9951-4552b497475a

Stevenson, Christopher J., Talling, P.J., Sumner, E.J., Masson, Douglas G., Frenz, M. and Wynn, R.B. (2014) On how thin submarine flows transported large volumes of sand for hundreds of kilometres across a flat basin plain without eroding the seafloor. Sedimentology, 61 (7), 1982-2019. (doi:10.1111/sed.12125).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Submarine gravity currents, especially long run-out flows that reach the deep ocean, are exceptionally difficult to monitor in action, hence there is a need to reconstruct how these flows behave from their deposits. This study mapped five individual flow deposits (beds) across the Agadir Basin, offshore north-west Africa. This is the only dataset where bed shape, internal distribution of lithofacies, changes in grain size and seafloor gradient, bed volumes, flow thickness and depth of erosion into underlying hemipelagic mud are known for individual beds. Some flows were 30 to 120 m thick. However, flows with the highest fraction of sand were less than 5 to 14 m thick. Sand was most likely to be carried in the lower 5 to 7 m of these flows. Despite being relatively thin, one flow was capable of transporting very large volumes of sediment (ca 200 km3) for large distances across very flat seafloor. These observations show that these relatively thin flows could travel quickly enough on very low gradients (0.02º to 0.05º) to suspend sand several metres to tens of metres above the sea floor, and maintain those speeds for up to 250 km across the basin. Near uniform hemipelagic mud interval thickness between beds, and coccolith assemblages in the mud caps of beds, suggest that the flows did not erode significantly into the underlying seafloor mud. Simple calculations imply that some flows, especially in the proximal part of the basin, were powerful enough to have eroded hemipelagic mud if it was exposed to the flow. This suggests that the flows were depositional from the moment they arrived at a basin plain location, and deposition shielded the underlying hemipelagic mud from erosion. Reproducing the field observations outlined in this exceptionally detailed field dataset is a challenge for future experimental and numerical models.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: May 2014
Published date: December 2014
Keywords: Deep water, flow thickness, long run-out, mud erosion, quantitative, flow reconstruction, turbidity current, flow processes
Organisations: Geology & Geophysics, Marine Geoscience

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 364387
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/364387
ISSN: 0037-0746
PURE UUID: 6e03f534-0749-476e-9e12-c07ce81d200b

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 May 2014 09:10
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 16:34

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Christopher J. Stevenson
Author: P.J. Talling
Author: E.J. Sumner
Author: Douglas G. Masson
Author: M. Frenz
Author: R.B. Wynn

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×