The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Aligning everyday life priorities with people's self-management support networks: an exploration of the work and implementation of a needs-led telephone support system

Aligning everyday life priorities with people's self-management support networks: an exploration of the work and implementation of a needs-led telephone support system
Aligning everyday life priorities with people's self-management support networks: an exploration of the work and implementation of a needs-led telephone support system
Background
Recent initiatives to target the personal, social and clinical needs of people with long-term health conditions have had limited impact within primary care. Evidence of the importance of social networks to support people with long-term conditions points to the need for self-management approaches which align personal circumstances with valued activities. The Patient-Led Assessment for Network Support (PLANS) intervention is a needs-led assessment for patients to prioritise their health and social needs and provide access to local community services and activities. Exploring the work and practices of patients and telephone workers are important for understanding and evaluating the workability and implementation of new interventions.

Methods
Qualitative methods (interviews, focus group, observations) were used to explore the experience of PLANS from the perspectives of participants and the telephone support workers who delivered it (as part of an RCT) and the reasons why the intervention worked or not. Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) was used as a sensitising tool to evaluate: the relevance of PLANS to patients (coherence); the processes of engagement (cognitive participation); the work done for PLANS to happen (collective action); the perceived benefits and costs of PLANS (reflexive monitoring). 20 patients in the intervention arm of a clinical trial were interviewed and their telephone support calls were recorded and a focus group with 3 telephone support workers was conducted.

Results
Analysis of the interviews, support calls and focus group identified three themes in relation to the delivery and experience of PLANS. These are: formulation of ‘health’ in the context of everyday life; trajectories and tipping points: disrupting everyday routines; precarious trust in networks. The relevance of these themes are considered using NPT constructs in terms of the work that is entailed in engaging with PLANS, taking action, and who is implicated this process.

Conclusions
PLANS gives scope to align long-term condition management to everyday life priorities and valued aspects of life. This approach can improve engagement with health-relevant practices by situating them within everyday contexts. This has potential to increase utilisation of local resources with potential cost-saving benefits for the NHS.
1472-6963
Blicken, C.
f7b1545a-8f2d-4a08-b877-f765a2015630
Kennedy, Anne
e059c1c7-d6d0-41c8-95e1-95e5273b07f8
Jariwala, P.
5e7bebb5-6476-4f4f-a3b0-95f89f7b8131
Morris, R.
b7cbbd1c-ba42-4140-aa43-140fc0f1d162
Bowen, R.
3c4c5a92-c7c8-46d0-b092-2caeba7a7e2c
Vassilev, I.
d76a5531-4ddc-4eb2-909b-a2a1068f05f3
Brooks, H.
51ab606b-017f-40a0-9dd1-552ff4d174fe
Blakeman, T.
917b8a58-9728-4cdb-80c9-f09e8cb14c1c
Rogers, Anne
105eeebc-1899-4850-950e-385a51738eb7
Blicken, C.
f7b1545a-8f2d-4a08-b877-f765a2015630
Kennedy, Anne
e059c1c7-d6d0-41c8-95e1-95e5273b07f8
Jariwala, P.
5e7bebb5-6476-4f4f-a3b0-95f89f7b8131
Morris, R.
b7cbbd1c-ba42-4140-aa43-140fc0f1d162
Bowen, R.
3c4c5a92-c7c8-46d0-b092-2caeba7a7e2c
Vassilev, I.
d76a5531-4ddc-4eb2-909b-a2a1068f05f3
Brooks, H.
51ab606b-017f-40a0-9dd1-552ff4d174fe
Blakeman, T.
917b8a58-9728-4cdb-80c9-f09e8cb14c1c
Rogers, Anne
105eeebc-1899-4850-950e-385a51738eb7

Blicken, C., Kennedy, Anne, Jariwala, P., Morris, R., Bowen, R., Vassilev, I., Brooks, H., Blakeman, T. and Rogers, Anne (2014) Aligning everyday life priorities with people's self-management support networks: an exploration of the work and implementation of a needs-led telephone support system. BMC Health Services Research, 14, [262]. (doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-262).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background
Recent initiatives to target the personal, social and clinical needs of people with long-term health conditions have had limited impact within primary care. Evidence of the importance of social networks to support people with long-term conditions points to the need for self-management approaches which align personal circumstances with valued activities. The Patient-Led Assessment for Network Support (PLANS) intervention is a needs-led assessment for patients to prioritise their health and social needs and provide access to local community services and activities. Exploring the work and practices of patients and telephone workers are important for understanding and evaluating the workability and implementation of new interventions.

Methods
Qualitative methods (interviews, focus group, observations) were used to explore the experience of PLANS from the perspectives of participants and the telephone support workers who delivered it (as part of an RCT) and the reasons why the intervention worked or not. Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) was used as a sensitising tool to evaluate: the relevance of PLANS to patients (coherence); the processes of engagement (cognitive participation); the work done for PLANS to happen (collective action); the perceived benefits and costs of PLANS (reflexive monitoring). 20 patients in the intervention arm of a clinical trial were interviewed and their telephone support calls were recorded and a focus group with 3 telephone support workers was conducted.

Results
Analysis of the interviews, support calls and focus group identified three themes in relation to the delivery and experience of PLANS. These are: formulation of ‘health’ in the context of everyday life; trajectories and tipping points: disrupting everyday routines; precarious trust in networks. The relevance of these themes are considered using NPT constructs in terms of the work that is entailed in engaging with PLANS, taking action, and who is implicated this process.

Conclusions
PLANS gives scope to align long-term condition management to everyday life priorities and valued aspects of life. This approach can improve engagement with health-relevant practices by situating them within everyday contexts. This has potential to increase utilisation of local resources with potential cost-saving benefits for the NHS.

Text
Aligning everyday life priorities with people self-management support 1472-6963-14-262.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (189kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 10 June 2014
e-pub ahead of print date: 17 June 2014
Published date: 17 June 2014
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 365907
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/365907
ISSN: 1472-6963
PURE UUID: 5d2d18e1-eafe-4471-ac81-b994f34d8f1d
ORCID for Anne Kennedy: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4570-9104
ORCID for I. Vassilev: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2206-8247

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Jun 2014 09:02
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:47

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: C. Blicken
Author: Anne Kennedy ORCID iD
Author: P. Jariwala
Author: R. Morris
Author: R. Bowen
Author: I. Vassilev ORCID iD
Author: H. Brooks
Author: T. Blakeman
Author: Anne Rogers

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×