The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Diagnosing pneumonia in patients with acute cough: clinical judgment compared to chest radiography

Diagnosing pneumonia in patients with acute cough: clinical judgment compared to chest radiography
Diagnosing pneumonia in patients with acute cough: clinical judgment compared to chest radiography
Pneumonia is often diagnosed and treated empirically, but the accuracy of clinical assessment alone is largely unknown. We therefore set out to determine the diagnostic accuracy of clinical judgment based on signs and symptoms to detect radiographic pneumonia in patients presenting with acute cough in primary care.

In 2810 patients consulting with acute cough in 12 European countries, general practitioners (GPs) recorded whether they considered pneumonia present (“yes” or “no”) immediately after the history and physical examination. Chest radiography was performed within one week by local radiologists blind to other patient characteristics.

140 patients had radiographic pneumonia (5%), of whom 41 (29%) had been diagnosed as such by the GP. GPs diagnosed pneumonia in 31 (1%) patients on clinical grounds who turned out not to have radiographic pneumonia (n=2670). In patients diagnosed with pneumonia by GPs on clinical grounds alone, 57% were subsequently diagnosed with radiographic pneumonia (positive predictive value, PPV). Negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity and specificity of GPs' clinical judgment were 96%, 29% and 99% respectively. Patients with radiographic pneumonia, but who had not been diagnosed empirically by GPs, presented with less severe symptoms compared to patients with a clinical diagnosis of pneumonia (p<0.05).

The predictive values of GPs' clinical judgment, particularly the high NPV's, are helpful in routine care. Nonetheless, the majority of diagnoses of radiographic pneumonias was not suspected on clinical grounds. There is a need to further support the detection of clinically relevant pneumonia in primary care
0903-1936
1076-1082
van Vugt, S.F.
82bb3992-b766-445d-a901-c8778f17d692
Verheij, T.J.
809e3576-51ad-48e2-9762-e5d1ab873728
de Jong, P.A.
74cd69ad-8755-47e3-9f32-0e7b2547e6e3
Butler, C.C.
736f78ad-3e18-4c63-900f-c2249577b645
Hood, K.
12e14eb3-2c75-409f-a69d-add733644d89
Coenen, S.
9afe2a52-9f4f-45bb-b8e5-c6ee3eeb3498
Goossens, H.
533640f7-b568-4d95-a7c1-28158d154ba8
Little, P.
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Broekhuizen, B.D.
c26db2c1-6bce-49f4-a037-e450ed2e6ef5
van Vugt, S.F.
82bb3992-b766-445d-a901-c8778f17d692
Verheij, T.J.
809e3576-51ad-48e2-9762-e5d1ab873728
de Jong, P.A.
74cd69ad-8755-47e3-9f32-0e7b2547e6e3
Butler, C.C.
736f78ad-3e18-4c63-900f-c2249577b645
Hood, K.
12e14eb3-2c75-409f-a69d-add733644d89
Coenen, S.
9afe2a52-9f4f-45bb-b8e5-c6ee3eeb3498
Goossens, H.
533640f7-b568-4d95-a7c1-28158d154ba8
Little, P.
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Broekhuizen, B.D.
c26db2c1-6bce-49f4-a037-e450ed2e6ef5

van Vugt, S.F., Verheij, T.J., de Jong, P.A., Butler, C.C., Hood, K., Coenen, S., Goossens, H., Little, P. and Broekhuizen, B.D. (2013) Diagnosing pneumonia in patients with acute cough: clinical judgment compared to chest radiography. European Respiratory Journal, 42 (4), 1076-1082. (doi:10.1183/09031936.00111012). (PMID:23349450)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Pneumonia is often diagnosed and treated empirically, but the accuracy of clinical assessment alone is largely unknown. We therefore set out to determine the diagnostic accuracy of clinical judgment based on signs and symptoms to detect radiographic pneumonia in patients presenting with acute cough in primary care.

In 2810 patients consulting with acute cough in 12 European countries, general practitioners (GPs) recorded whether they considered pneumonia present (“yes” or “no”) immediately after the history and physical examination. Chest radiography was performed within one week by local radiologists blind to other patient characteristics.

140 patients had radiographic pneumonia (5%), of whom 41 (29%) had been diagnosed as such by the GP. GPs diagnosed pneumonia in 31 (1%) patients on clinical grounds who turned out not to have radiographic pneumonia (n=2670). In patients diagnosed with pneumonia by GPs on clinical grounds alone, 57% were subsequently diagnosed with radiographic pneumonia (positive predictive value, PPV). Negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity and specificity of GPs' clinical judgment were 96%, 29% and 99% respectively. Patients with radiographic pneumonia, but who had not been diagnosed empirically by GPs, presented with less severe symptoms compared to patients with a clinical diagnosis of pneumonia (p<0.05).

The predictive values of GPs' clinical judgment, particularly the high NPV's, are helpful in routine care. Nonetheless, the majority of diagnoses of radiographic pneumonias was not suspected on clinical grounds. There is a need to further support the detection of clinically relevant pneumonia in primary care

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2013
Organisations: Primary Care & Population Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 365979
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/365979
ISSN: 0903-1936
PURE UUID: cd23e224-b138-4a57-9a54-d04d6b562cd1

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Jun 2014 08:54
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 17:03

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: S.F. van Vugt
Author: T.J. Verheij
Author: P.A. de Jong
Author: C.C. Butler
Author: K. Hood
Author: S. Coenen
Author: H. Goossens
Author: P. Little
Author: B.D. Broekhuizen

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×