Managing summative computer-aided assessment failures: further evidence for 'optional substitution'
Harwood, Ian A. (2006) Managing summative computer-aided assessment failures: further evidence for 'optional substitution'. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37, (4), 637-641. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00583.x).
Full text not available from this repository.
A recent BJET article (Harwood, 2005) has outlined how 'optional substitution' was used to recover from a large-scale summative CAA failure. This follow-up article draws on a new (full) data set to confirm the appropriateness of using maximum formative marks (rather than average formative scores for instance) as a proxy measure of summative performance. A decision-making aid is also provided to guide those unfortunate enough to be considering the use of optional substitution following a CAA failure.
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI):||doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00583.x|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
L Education > L Education (General)
|Divisions :||University Structure - Pre August 2011 > School of Management
|Accepted Date and Publication Date:||
|Date Deposited:||23 May 2006|
|Last Modified:||31 Mar 2016 12:06|
|RDF:||RDF+N-Triples, RDF+N3, RDF+XML, Browse.|
Actions (login required)