The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Trade policy: home market effect versus terms-of-trade externality

Trade policy: home market effect versus terms-of-trade externality
Trade policy: home market effect versus terms-of-trade externality
We study trade policy in a two-sector Krugman (1980) trade model, allowing for wage, import and export subsidies/taxes. We study non-cooperative trade policies, first for each individual instrument and then for the situation where all instruments can be set simultaneously, and contrast those with the efficient allocation. We show that in this general context there are four motives for non-cooperative trade policies: the correction of monopolistic distortions; the terms-of-trade manipulation; the delocation motive for protection (home market effect); the fiscal-burden-shifting motive. The Nash equilibrium when all instruments are available is characterized by first-best-level wage subsidies, and inefficient import subsidies and export taxes, which aim at relocating firms to the other economy and improving terms of trade. Thus, the dominating incentives for non-cooperative trade policies are the fiscal-burden-shifting motives and terms-of-trade effects.
home market effect, terms of trade, tariffs and subsidies
0022-1996
92-107
Campolmi, Alessia
26bf441d-b3a8-4899-967b-146be106ac0c
Fadinger, Harald
1e8f7a50-0743-442a-bd20-89db5d2357dd
Forlati, Chiara
7be0a723-e9b7-4247-8d6f-bfe224d61845
Campolmi, Alessia
26bf441d-b3a8-4899-967b-146be106ac0c
Fadinger, Harald
1e8f7a50-0743-442a-bd20-89db5d2357dd
Forlati, Chiara
7be0a723-e9b7-4247-8d6f-bfe224d61845

Campolmi, Alessia, Fadinger, Harald and Forlati, Chiara (2014) Trade policy: home market effect versus terms-of-trade externality. Journal of International Economics, 93 (1), 92-107. (doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.12.010).

Record type: Article

Abstract

We study trade policy in a two-sector Krugman (1980) trade model, allowing for wage, import and export subsidies/taxes. We study non-cooperative trade policies, first for each individual instrument and then for the situation where all instruments can be set simultaneously, and contrast those with the efficient allocation. We show that in this general context there are four motives for non-cooperative trade policies: the correction of monopolistic distortions; the terms-of-trade manipulation; the delocation motive for protection (home market effect); the fiscal-burden-shifting motive. The Nash equilibrium when all instruments are available is characterized by first-best-level wage subsidies, and inefficient import subsidies and export taxes, which aim at relocating firms to the other economy and improving terms of trade. Thus, the dominating incentives for non-cooperative trade policies are the fiscal-burden-shifting motives and terms-of-trade effects.

Text
CFF13.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Download (216kB)
Text
JIECFF.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
CFF13.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: January 2014
e-pub ahead of print date: 25 January 2014
Published date: May 2014
Keywords: home market effect, terms of trade, tariffs and subsidies
Organisations: Economics

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 370320
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/370320
ISSN: 0022-1996
PURE UUID: 79d79802-9d76-4d7b-acc6-1958867c8440
ORCID for Chiara Forlati: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2914-1504

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Oct 2015 08:08
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 05:09

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Alessia Campolmi
Author: Harald Fadinger
Author: Chiara Forlati ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×