The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Are changes in semantic and structural information sufficient for oculomotor capture?

Are changes in semantic and structural information sufficient for oculomotor capture?
Are changes in semantic and structural information sufficient for oculomotor capture?
The abrupt onset of objects often involuntarily captures attention (J. Jonides & S. Yantis, 1988) and the eyes (J. Theeuwes, A. F. Kramer, S. Hahn, & D. Irwin, 1998). The new-object hypothesis proposes that the appearance of something new (new semantic and structural information and/or spatiotemporal newness), not the accompanying low-level perceptual transients, causes an involuntary reorienting of attention (S. Yantis & A. P. Hillstrom, 1994). We investigated whether semantic and structural changes alone are sufficient to capture the eyes as strongly as abrupt onsets do. Observers moved their eyes to a target object while another object either onset or smoothly and quickly morphed. If semantic and structural changes are sufficient to capture the eyes, morphs should capture the eyes as strongly as onsets do. Results show that morphs were not fixated first as often as onsets. These findings indicate that new semantic and structural information alone is far less effective at capturing the eyes as onsets.
1534-7362
1-10
Wong, J.
dfe76465-4919-4ea4-b78a-541e870364b1
Peterson, M.
692fc059-3987-4815-984e-d51eeff6a0c8
Hillstrom, Anne
44c48770-8db7-4316-aa7b-bed366c031b4
Wong, J.
dfe76465-4919-4ea4-b78a-541e870364b1
Peterson, M.
692fc059-3987-4815-984e-d51eeff6a0c8
Hillstrom, Anne
44c48770-8db7-4316-aa7b-bed366c031b4

Wong, J., Peterson, M. and Hillstrom, Anne (2007) Are changes in semantic and structural information sufficient for oculomotor capture? Journal of Vision, 7 (12), 1-10. (doi:10.1167/7.12.3). (PMID:17997645)

Record type: Article

Abstract

The abrupt onset of objects often involuntarily captures attention (J. Jonides & S. Yantis, 1988) and the eyes (J. Theeuwes, A. F. Kramer, S. Hahn, & D. Irwin, 1998). The new-object hypothesis proposes that the appearance of something new (new semantic and structural information and/or spatiotemporal newness), not the accompanying low-level perceptual transients, causes an involuntary reorienting of attention (S. Yantis & A. P. Hillstrom, 1994). We investigated whether semantic and structural changes alone are sufficient to capture the eyes as strongly as abrupt onsets do. Observers moved their eyes to a target object while another object either onset or smoothly and quickly morphed. If semantic and structural changes are sufficient to capture the eyes, morphs should capture the eyes as strongly as onsets do. Results show that morphs were not fixated first as often as onsets. These findings indicate that new semantic and structural information alone is far less effective at capturing the eyes as onsets.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: September 2007

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 371616
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/371616
ISSN: 1534-7362
PURE UUID: 626ca416-6d89-4390-b666-b3b00e99ade8

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Nov 2014 08:48
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 18:23

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: J. Wong
Author: M. Peterson
Author: Anne Hillstrom

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×