The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Attentional limitations in processing sequentially presented vibrotactile targets

Attentional limitations in processing sequentially presented vibrotactile targets
Attentional limitations in processing sequentially presented vibrotactile targets
In seven experiments, participants experienced rapid, serially presented streams of vibrations and responded to specific targets in the streams. In visual (and sometimes auditory) streams presented in this manner, it is typical to find a deficit in reporting the second of two targets when both must be reported and the second appears within a short temporal interval of the first, but not when identical displays are presented but only the second target must be reported (e.g., the attentional blink, or AB). This conventional AB pattern was found in the last experiment, in which judgments were about target location. However in the first six experiments reported here, in which judgments were about frequency, intensity, duration, or location of targets, accuracy was dependent on target separation regardless of whether or not the first target was reported. This unconventional pattern could represent an AB if the first target was attended even when it was not reported. The evidence for this claim and an alternative possibility that location judgments are especially sensitive to attention manipulations are discussed
1068-1082
Hillstrom, Anne
44c48770-8db7-4316-aa7b-bed366c031b4
Shapiro, K.
e0cdc71a-0c27-4c2d-88b3-3005f468a982
Spence, C.
8b8af7b5-643c-4ee8-9b59-7087ec75c1e7
Hillstrom, Anne
44c48770-8db7-4316-aa7b-bed366c031b4
Shapiro, K.
e0cdc71a-0c27-4c2d-88b3-3005f468a982
Spence, C.
8b8af7b5-643c-4ee8-9b59-7087ec75c1e7

Hillstrom, Anne, Shapiro, K. and Spence, C. (2002) Attentional limitations in processing sequentially presented vibrotactile targets. Perception and Psychophysics, 64 (7), 1068-1082. (doi:10.3758/BF03194757). (PMID:12489662)

Record type: Article

Abstract

In seven experiments, participants experienced rapid, serially presented streams of vibrations and responded to specific targets in the streams. In visual (and sometimes auditory) streams presented in this manner, it is typical to find a deficit in reporting the second of two targets when both must be reported and the second appears within a short temporal interval of the first, but not when identical displays are presented but only the second target must be reported (e.g., the attentional blink, or AB). This conventional AB pattern was found in the last experiment, in which judgments were about target location. However in the first six experiments reported here, in which judgments were about frequency, intensity, duration, or location of targets, accuracy was dependent on target separation regardless of whether or not the first target was reported. This unconventional pattern could represent an AB if the first target was attended even when it was not reported. The evidence for this claim and an alternative possibility that location judgments are especially sensitive to attention manipulations are discussed

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: October 2002

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 371620
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/371620
PURE UUID: c391b405-316b-4c46-b37d-dc8da5628913

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Nov 2014 09:33
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 18:23

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Anne Hillstrom
Author: K. Shapiro
Author: C. Spence

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×