The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Looking for the archaeological signature in Australian Megafaunal extinctions

Looking for the archaeological signature in Australian Megafaunal extinctions
Looking for the archaeological signature in Australian Megafaunal extinctions

The decline and disappearance of a range of giant marsupials, reptiles and birds from the Australian landscape during the last Glacial cycle continues to capture the imagination of both researchers and the general public. The events hinted at in the Australian fossil sequences appear to be mirrored on other continents through similar time periods, though the exact cause or sequence of extinctions remains largely unresolved. In recent years debate over megafaunal extinctions in Australia has been dominated by reports that humans were the primary drivers, leading some to assert that it is no longer a question of whether humans drove these extinctions, only how. Following the review of Wroe and Field, new reports have been published that claim support for a human-driven extinction (HDE). On closer scrutiny however, the key sites and samples lack firm contextual data and/or clear provenance. These studies fail to prove a key tenet of the HDE – that all, or even most now-extinct species were present at the time of human colonization of the continent. As compared with the easy assertion 5 years ago that this had been established, there are now more faunal species (c. 69% of total known to have become extinct) that cannot be placed within 50–100 ka of human arrival. There are still only two sites that demonstrate a coexistence of humans with some species of megafauna – Nombe Rockshelter in the PNG highlands and Cuddie Springs in the semi-arid southeast of Australia. If there is so little empirical evidence for coexistence or association of megafauna with humans, then support for an HDE through overhunting and ecosystem disruption is seriously compromised. Furthermore, the popularly cited “extinction window”, proposed as c. 51–39 ka when the HDE is argued to occur, is still only a theoretical construct. There is no clear evidence indicating that this period was particularly significant in terms of faunal loss. At present, the great majority of ‘Pleistocene’ sites remain poorly dated and the understanding of faunal turnover through this epoch is almost non-existent. Small datasets, poorly constructed hypotheses and assertive rhetoric are the prominent features of current discussions on a human role in megafaunal extinctions. Importantly, it is yet to be established whether the extinctions are an archaeological problem. The sparse fossil record known from Australia hampers a clear resolution as to how and when the megafauna disappeared, a situation likely to continue into the near future.
1040-6182
76-88
Field, Judith
574a1ce2-7f09-4b7b-b7b0-1cbe72c0ac17
Wroe, Stephen
ebe4fc21-1d6e-48a1-90ee-b481268fa241
Trueman, Clive N.
d00d3bd6-a47b-4d47-89ae-841c3d506205
Garvey, Jillian
f4b2b93f-034f-44eb-87d6-c5a7c1bd86ba
Wyatt-Spratt, Simon
04d31bd2-932f-4ad1-9b3e-d0c2c6640abe
Field, Judith
574a1ce2-7f09-4b7b-b7b0-1cbe72c0ac17
Wroe, Stephen
ebe4fc21-1d6e-48a1-90ee-b481268fa241
Trueman, Clive N.
d00d3bd6-a47b-4d47-89ae-841c3d506205
Garvey, Jillian
f4b2b93f-034f-44eb-87d6-c5a7c1bd86ba
Wyatt-Spratt, Simon
04d31bd2-932f-4ad1-9b3e-d0c2c6640abe

Field, Judith, Wroe, Stephen, Trueman, Clive N., Garvey, Jillian and Wyatt-Spratt, Simon (2013) Looking for the archaeological signature in Australian Megafaunal extinctions. Quaternary International, 285, 76-88. (doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2011.04.013).

Record type: Article

Abstract


The decline and disappearance of a range of giant marsupials, reptiles and birds from the Australian landscape during the last Glacial cycle continues to capture the imagination of both researchers and the general public. The events hinted at in the Australian fossil sequences appear to be mirrored on other continents through similar time periods, though the exact cause or sequence of extinctions remains largely unresolved. In recent years debate over megafaunal extinctions in Australia has been dominated by reports that humans were the primary drivers, leading some to assert that it is no longer a question of whether humans drove these extinctions, only how. Following the review of Wroe and Field, new reports have been published that claim support for a human-driven extinction (HDE). On closer scrutiny however, the key sites and samples lack firm contextual data and/or clear provenance. These studies fail to prove a key tenet of the HDE – that all, or even most now-extinct species were present at the time of human colonization of the continent. As compared with the easy assertion 5 years ago that this had been established, there are now more faunal species (c. 69% of total known to have become extinct) that cannot be placed within 50–100 ka of human arrival. There are still only two sites that demonstrate a coexistence of humans with some species of megafauna – Nombe Rockshelter in the PNG highlands and Cuddie Springs in the semi-arid southeast of Australia. If there is so little empirical evidence for coexistence or association of megafauna with humans, then support for an HDE through overhunting and ecosystem disruption is seriously compromised. Furthermore, the popularly cited “extinction window”, proposed as c. 51–39 ka when the HDE is argued to occur, is still only a theoretical construct. There is no clear evidence indicating that this period was particularly significant in terms of faunal loss. At present, the great majority of ‘Pleistocene’ sites remain poorly dated and the understanding of faunal turnover through this epoch is almost non-existent. Small datasets, poorly constructed hypotheses and assertive rhetoric are the prominent features of current discussions on a human role in megafaunal extinctions. Importantly, it is yet to be established whether the extinctions are an archaeological problem. The sparse fossil record known from Australia hampers a clear resolution as to how and when the megafauna disappeared, a situation likely to continue into the near future.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 8 February 2013
Organisations: Geochemistry

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 371946
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/371946
ISSN: 1040-6182
PURE UUID: 697de462-5460-4901-b0b9-9b4253638ed0
ORCID for Clive N. Trueman: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4995-736X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Nov 2014 16:59
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:17

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Judith Field
Author: Stephen Wroe
Author: Jillian Garvey
Author: Simon Wyatt-Spratt

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×