Serial fiction, the End?
Serial fiction, the End?
Andrew McGonigal presents some interesting data concerning truth in serial fictions.1 Such data has been taken by McGonigal, Cameron and Caplan to motivate some form of contextualism or relativism. I argue, however, that many of these approaches are problematic, and that all are under-motivated as the data can be explained in a standard invariantist semantic framework given some independently plausible principles.
323-341
Walters, Lee
6588848d-16fa-41f1-a94b-c339c3428c13
2015
Walters, Lee
6588848d-16fa-41f1-a94b-c339c3428c13
Abstract
Andrew McGonigal presents some interesting data concerning truth in serial fictions.1 Such data has been taken by McGonigal, Cameron and Caplan to motivate some form of contextualism or relativism. I argue, however, that many of these approaches are problematic, and that all are under-motivated as the data can be explained in a standard invariantist semantic framework given some independently plausible principles.
Text
Serial Fiction The End.pdf
- Other
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 27 November 2015
Published date: 2015
Organisations:
Philosophy
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 371947
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/371947
ISSN: 0007-0904
PURE UUID: 8f802556-b992-4b8b-9b48-595eb7c805dc
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Jan 2015 16:45
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:48
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
