The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

UK employment services: understanding provider strategies in a dynamic strategic action field

UK employment services: understanding provider strategies in a dynamic strategic action field
UK employment services: understanding provider strategies in a dynamic strategic action field
UK employment services are increasingly delivered by public, private and third sector organisations in quasi-markets that can be viewed as fields with actors (providers) competing for resources and position. The commissioning of the Work Programme produced an ‘episode of contention’ as fewer resources, shifting policy priorities and new contractual arrangements restructured relationships within the field. Drawing on empirical research the paper demonstrates how providers with different resources have navigated this period, employing strategies to manage challenger and incumbent roles and maintain their position in the field. The findings contribute to both field theory and our theoretical understanding of employment services
work programme commissioning, employment services, field theory, sector
0305-5736
253-267
Taylor, Rebecca
5c52e191-4620-4218-8a61-926c62e087c5
Rees, James
6cc542e5-c467-4aec-a2f7-31193032d03e
Damm, Christopher
d1370d31-4f1f-48bd-bd82-85e31392982b
Taylor, Rebecca
5c52e191-4620-4218-8a61-926c62e087c5
Rees, James
6cc542e5-c467-4aec-a2f7-31193032d03e
Damm, Christopher
d1370d31-4f1f-48bd-bd82-85e31392982b

Taylor, Rebecca, Rees, James and Damm, Christopher (2016) UK employment services: understanding provider strategies in a dynamic strategic action field. Policy & Politics, 44 (2), 253-267. (doi:10.1332/030557314X14079275800414).

Record type: Article

Abstract

UK employment services are increasingly delivered by public, private and third sector organisations in quasi-markets that can be viewed as fields with actors (providers) competing for resources and position. The commissioning of the Work Programme produced an ‘episode of contention’ as fewer resources, shifting policy priorities and new contractual arrangements restructured relationships within the field. Drawing on empirical research the paper demonstrates how providers with different resources have navigated this period, employing strategies to manage challenger and incumbent roles and maintain their position in the field. The findings contribute to both field theory and our theoretical understanding of employment services

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 31 March 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 April 2016
Published date: 1 April 2016
Keywords: work programme commissioning, employment services, field theory, sector
Organisations: Social Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 375209
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/375209
ISSN: 0305-5736
PURE UUID: 6796e6d5-5ace-4ad6-a84a-614c0d228951
ORCID for Rebecca Taylor: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8677-0246

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Mar 2015 11:46
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:51

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Rebecca Taylor ORCID iD
Author: James Rees
Author: Christopher Damm

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×