The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Fundamental differences in axial and appendicular bone density in stress fractured and uninjured Royal Marine recruits - A matched case-control study

Fundamental differences in axial and appendicular bone density in stress fractured and uninjured Royal Marine recruits - A matched case-control study
Fundamental differences in axial and appendicular bone density in stress fractured and uninjured Royal Marine recruits - A matched case-control study
Stress fracture is a common overuse injury within military training, resulting in significant economic losses to the military worldwide. Studies to date have failed to fully identify the bone density and bone structural differences between stress fractured personnel and controls due to inadequate adjustment for key confounding factors; namely age, body size and physical fitness; and poor sample size. The aim of this study was to investigate bone differences between male Royal Marine recruits who suffered a stress fracture during the 32 weeks of training and uninjured control recruits, matched for age, body weight, height and aerobic fitness. A total of 1090 recruits were followed through training and 78 recruits suffered at least one stress fracture. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN) and whole body (WB) using Dual X-ray Absorptiometry in 62 matched pairs; tibial bone parameters were measured using peripheral Quantitative Computer Tomography in 51 matched pairs. Serum C-terminal peptide concentration was measured as a marker of bone resorption at baseline, week-15 and week-32. ANCOVA was used to determine differences between stress fractured recruits and controls. BMD at the LS, WB and FN sites was consistently lower in the stress fracture group (P < 0.001). Structural differences between the stress fracture recruits and controls were evident in all slices of the tibia, with the most prominent differences seen at the 38% tibial slice. There was a negative correlation between the bone cross-sectional area and BMD at the 38% tibial slice. There was no difference in serum CTx concentration between stress fracture recruits and matched controls at any stage of training. These results show evidence of fundamental differences in bone mass and structure in stress fracture recruits, and provide useful data on bone risk factor profiles for stress fracture within a healthy military population.
dxa, bone ultrasound, bone qct, exercise, biochemical markers of bone turnover
8756-3282
120-126
Davey, T.
495f3b12-9729-4b10-936d-1f38b4c156d4
Lanham-New, S.A.
d6552d11-22a0-41d7-a30c-d7cb35ede4c9
Shaw, A.M.
2c6b4ce2-e465-4c1b-a8fd-f2af0cb37df5
Cobley, R.
65a867f7-64e0-41cb-9359-ee0c66f95359
Allsopp, A.J.
c4b438fa-7cac-4165-8cb8-004399b49ef4
Hajjawi, M.O.
a80a2d08-57ff-46c3-b17f-8a90f9dc1731
Arnett, T.R.
d3f012d4-acb7-4f49-af6b-7cd8a6c9e8bf
Taylor, P.
28b91e71-fad2-4375-8a1e-535f861901c3
Cooper, C.
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Fallowfield, J.L.
94d9253e-7a35-4e47-b6c7-eabe6f14cc6b
Davey, T.
495f3b12-9729-4b10-936d-1f38b4c156d4
Lanham-New, S.A.
d6552d11-22a0-41d7-a30c-d7cb35ede4c9
Shaw, A.M.
2c6b4ce2-e465-4c1b-a8fd-f2af0cb37df5
Cobley, R.
65a867f7-64e0-41cb-9359-ee0c66f95359
Allsopp, A.J.
c4b438fa-7cac-4165-8cb8-004399b49ef4
Hajjawi, M.O.
a80a2d08-57ff-46c3-b17f-8a90f9dc1731
Arnett, T.R.
d3f012d4-acb7-4f49-af6b-7cd8a6c9e8bf
Taylor, P.
28b91e71-fad2-4375-8a1e-535f861901c3
Cooper, C.
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Fallowfield, J.L.
94d9253e-7a35-4e47-b6c7-eabe6f14cc6b

Davey, T., Lanham-New, S.A., Shaw, A.M., Cobley, R., Allsopp, A.J., Hajjawi, M.O., Arnett, T.R., Taylor, P., Cooper, C. and Fallowfield, J.L. (2015) Fundamental differences in axial and appendicular bone density in stress fractured and uninjured Royal Marine recruits - A matched case-control study. Bone, 73, 120-126. (doi:10.1016/j.bone.2014.12.018). (PMID:25543013)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Stress fracture is a common overuse injury within military training, resulting in significant economic losses to the military worldwide. Studies to date have failed to fully identify the bone density and bone structural differences between stress fractured personnel and controls due to inadequate adjustment for key confounding factors; namely age, body size and physical fitness; and poor sample size. The aim of this study was to investigate bone differences between male Royal Marine recruits who suffered a stress fracture during the 32 weeks of training and uninjured control recruits, matched for age, body weight, height and aerobic fitness. A total of 1090 recruits were followed through training and 78 recruits suffered at least one stress fracture. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN) and whole body (WB) using Dual X-ray Absorptiometry in 62 matched pairs; tibial bone parameters were measured using peripheral Quantitative Computer Tomography in 51 matched pairs. Serum C-terminal peptide concentration was measured as a marker of bone resorption at baseline, week-15 and week-32. ANCOVA was used to determine differences between stress fractured recruits and controls. BMD at the LS, WB and FN sites was consistently lower in the stress fracture group (P < 0.001). Structural differences between the stress fracture recruits and controls were evident in all slices of the tibia, with the most prominent differences seen at the 38% tibial slice. There was a negative correlation between the bone cross-sectional area and BMD at the 38% tibial slice. There was no difference in serum CTx concentration between stress fracture recruits and matched controls at any stage of training. These results show evidence of fundamental differences in bone mass and structure in stress fracture recruits, and provide useful data on bone risk factor profiles for stress fracture within a healthy military population.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 18 December 2014
e-pub ahead of print date: 24 December 2014
Published date: April 2015
Keywords: dxa, bone ultrasound, bone qct, exercise, biochemical markers of bone turnover
Organisations: Human Development & Health

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 375578
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/375578
ISSN: 8756-3282
PURE UUID: 3b5730f2-00f6-422b-95f8-0884440a7931
ORCID for C. Cooper: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-0709

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Mar 2015 13:09
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 02:45

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: T. Davey
Author: S.A. Lanham-New
Author: A.M. Shaw
Author: R. Cobley
Author: A.J. Allsopp
Author: M.O. Hajjawi
Author: T.R. Arnett
Author: P. Taylor
Author: C. Cooper ORCID iD
Author: J.L. Fallowfield

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×