The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Association of supply type with fecal contamiantion of source water and household stored drinking water in developing countries: a bivariate meta-analysis

Association of supply type with fecal contamiantion of source water and household stored drinking water in developing countries: a bivariate meta-analysis
Association of supply type with fecal contamiantion of source water and household stored drinking water in developing countries: a bivariate meta-analysis
Background: Access to safe drinking water is essential for health. Monitoring access to drinking water focuses on water supply type at the source, but there is limited evidence on whether quality differences at the source persist in water stored in the household.

Objectives: To assess the extent of fecal contamination at the source and in household stored water (HSW) and explore the relationship between contamination at each of these sampling points and water supply type.

Methods: A bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of 45 studies, identified through a systematic review, that reported either the proportion of samples free of fecal indicator bacteria and/or individual sample bacteria counts for source and HSW, disaggregated by supply type.

Results: Water quality deteriorated substantially between source and stored water. Mean percentage of contaminated samples (noncompliance) at the source was 46% (95% CI: 33, 60%) while mean noncompliance in HSW was 75% (95% CI: 64, 84%). Water supply type was significantly associated with noncompliance at the source (p < .001) and in HSW (p = 0.03). Source water (OR = 0.2; 95% CI: 0.1, 0.5) and HSW (OR = 0.3; 95% CI: 0.2, 0.8) from piped supplies had significantly lower odds of contamination when compared to non-piped water, potentially due to residual chlorine.

Conclusions: Piped water is less likely to be contaminated compared to other water supply types at both the source and in HSW. A focus on upgrading water services to piped supplies may help improve safety, including for those drinking stored water.
0091-6765
1-49
Shields, K.
da8fe00b-77e8-4a08-85a6-0f02ba7d64d9
Bain, R.
ad9d875b-1b72-4018-a0b4-e1d872e6d039
Cronk, R.
e1714ce6-b6dd-4bc9-8b08-0335da1d52f8
Wright, J.A.
94990ecf-f8dd-4649-84f2-b28bf272e464
Bartram, J.
89ea4745-2e0b-41c7-bcb7-909ff36fa902
Shields, K.
da8fe00b-77e8-4a08-85a6-0f02ba7d64d9
Bain, R.
ad9d875b-1b72-4018-a0b4-e1d872e6d039
Cronk, R.
e1714ce6-b6dd-4bc9-8b08-0335da1d52f8
Wright, J.A.
94990ecf-f8dd-4649-84f2-b28bf272e464
Bartram, J.
89ea4745-2e0b-41c7-bcb7-909ff36fa902

Shields, K., Bain, R., Cronk, R., Wright, J.A. and Bartram, J. (2015) Association of supply type with fecal contamiantion of source water and household stored drinking water in developing countries: a bivariate meta-analysis. Environmental Health Perspectives, 1-49. (doi:10.1289/ehp.1409002).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Access to safe drinking water is essential for health. Monitoring access to drinking water focuses on water supply type at the source, but there is limited evidence on whether quality differences at the source persist in water stored in the household.

Objectives: To assess the extent of fecal contamination at the source and in household stored water (HSW) and explore the relationship between contamination at each of these sampling points and water supply type.

Methods: A bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of 45 studies, identified through a systematic review, that reported either the proportion of samples free of fecal indicator bacteria and/or individual sample bacteria counts for source and HSW, disaggregated by supply type.

Results: Water quality deteriorated substantially between source and stored water. Mean percentage of contaminated samples (noncompliance) at the source was 46% (95% CI: 33, 60%) while mean noncompliance in HSW was 75% (95% CI: 64, 84%). Water supply type was significantly associated with noncompliance at the source (p < .001) and in HSW (p = 0.03). Source water (OR = 0.2; 95% CI: 0.1, 0.5) and HSW (OR = 0.3; 95% CI: 0.2, 0.8) from piped supplies had significantly lower odds of contamination when compared to non-piped water, potentially due to residual chlorine.

Conclusions: Piped water is less likely to be contaminated compared to other water supply types at both the source and in HSW. A focus on upgrading water services to piped supplies may help improve safety, including for those drinking stored water.

Text
Shields_etal2015b.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Download (899kB)

More information

Submitted date: 25 July 2014
Accepted/In Press date: 6 May 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 8 May 2015
Organisations: Population, Health & Wellbeing (PHeW)

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 376928
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/376928
ISSN: 0091-6765
PURE UUID: 6ae1cdb8-16c7-45cc-ab27-097f7970cb94
ORCID for J.A. Wright: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8842-2181

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Jun 2015 08:42
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:21

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: K. Shields
Author: R. Bain
Author: R. Cronk
Author: J.A. Wright ORCID iD
Author: J. Bartram

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×