The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Outcome of appendicectomy in children performed in paediatric surgery units compared with general surgery units

Outcome of appendicectomy in children performed in paediatric surgery units compared with general surgery units
Outcome of appendicectomy in children performed in paediatric surgery units compared with general surgery units
Background: appendicectomy for acute appendicitis in children may be performed in specialist centres by paediatric surgeons or in general surgery units. Service provision and outcome of appendicectomy in children may differ between such units.

Methods: this multicentre observational study included all children (aged less than 16 years) who had an appendicectomy at either a paediatric surgery unit or general surgery unit. The primary outcome was normal appendicectomy rate (NAR). Secondary outcomes included 30-day adverse events, use of ultrasound imaging and laparoscopy, and consultant involvement in procedures.

Results: appendicectomies performed in 19 paediatric surgery units (242 children) and 54 general surgery units (461 children) were included. Children treated in paediatric surgery units were younger and more likely to have a preoperative ultrasound examination, a laparoscopic procedure, a consultant present at the procedure, and histologically advanced appendicitis than children treated in general surgery units. The unadjusted NAR was significantly lower in paediatric surgery units (odds ratio (OR) 0·37, 95 per cent confidence interval 0·23 to 0·59; P?<?0·001), and the difference persisted after adjusting for age, sex and use of preoperative ultrasound imaging (OR 0·34, 0·21 to 0·57; P?<?0·001). Female sex and preoperative ultrasonography, but not age, were significantly associated with normal appendicectomy in general surgery units but not in paediatric surgery units in this adjusted model. The unadjusted 30-day adverse event rate was higher in paediatric surgery units than in general surgery units (OR 1·90, 1·18 to 3·06; P?=?0·011). When adjusted for case mix and consultant presence at surgery, no statistically significant relationship between centre type and 30-day adverse event rate existed (OR 1·59, 0·93 to 2·73; P?=?0·091).

Conclusion: the NAR in general surgery units was over twice that in paediatric surgery units. Despite a more severe case mix, paediatric surgery units had a similar 30-day adverse event rate to general surgery units. Service provision differs between paediatric and general surgery units
707-714
Tiboni, S.
776b96c5-49b7-41c2-9a47-ccb1c157ef4e
Bhangu, A.
f4d282de-34dc-4ecf-b859-916df33fe4b0
Hall, Nigel J.
6919e8af-3890-42c1-98a7-c110791957cf
Tiboni, S.
776b96c5-49b7-41c2-9a47-ccb1c157ef4e
Bhangu, A.
f4d282de-34dc-4ecf-b859-916df33fe4b0
Hall, Nigel J.
6919e8af-3890-42c1-98a7-c110791957cf

Tiboni, S., Bhangu, A. and Hall, Nigel J. (2014) Outcome of appendicectomy in children performed in paediatric surgery units compared with general surgery units. British Journal of Surgery, 101 (6), 707-714. (doi:10.1002/bjs.9455). (PMID:24700440)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: appendicectomy for acute appendicitis in children may be performed in specialist centres by paediatric surgeons or in general surgery units. Service provision and outcome of appendicectomy in children may differ between such units.

Methods: this multicentre observational study included all children (aged less than 16 years) who had an appendicectomy at either a paediatric surgery unit or general surgery unit. The primary outcome was normal appendicectomy rate (NAR). Secondary outcomes included 30-day adverse events, use of ultrasound imaging and laparoscopy, and consultant involvement in procedures.

Results: appendicectomies performed in 19 paediatric surgery units (242 children) and 54 general surgery units (461 children) were included. Children treated in paediatric surgery units were younger and more likely to have a preoperative ultrasound examination, a laparoscopic procedure, a consultant present at the procedure, and histologically advanced appendicitis than children treated in general surgery units. The unadjusted NAR was significantly lower in paediatric surgery units (odds ratio (OR) 0·37, 95 per cent confidence interval 0·23 to 0·59; P?<?0·001), and the difference persisted after adjusting for age, sex and use of preoperative ultrasound imaging (OR 0·34, 0·21 to 0·57; P?<?0·001). Female sex and preoperative ultrasonography, but not age, were significantly associated with normal appendicectomy in general surgery units but not in paediatric surgery units in this adjusted model. The unadjusted 30-day adverse event rate was higher in paediatric surgery units than in general surgery units (OR 1·90, 1·18 to 3·06; P?=?0·011). When adjusted for case mix and consultant presence at surgery, no statistically significant relationship between centre type and 30-day adverse event rate existed (OR 1·59, 0·93 to 2·73; P?=?0·091).

Conclusion: the NAR in general surgery units was over twice that in paediatric surgery units. Despite a more severe case mix, paediatric surgery units had a similar 30-day adverse event rate to general surgery units. Service provision differs between paediatric and general surgery units

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 14 January 2014
e-pub ahead of print date: 2 April 2014
Published date: May 2014
Organisations: Human Development & Health

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 378440
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/378440
PURE UUID: b61dd04f-4fc1-4140-bba4-fbe47bf5342b
ORCID for Nigel J. Hall: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8570-9374

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Jul 2015 08:20
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:38

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: S. Tiboni
Author: A. Bhangu
Author: Nigel J. Hall ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×