The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Synergisms between laboratory mechanical and abrasion damage on mechanical and hydraulic properties of geosynthetics

Synergisms between laboratory mechanical and abrasion damage on mechanical and hydraulic properties of geosynthetics
Synergisms between laboratory mechanical and abrasion damage on mechanical and hydraulic properties of geosynthetics
This paper analyses the existence of synergisms between some endurance durability agents of geosynthetics – mechanical damage (usually associated with installation) and abrasion damage (often associated with cyclic actions, for example due to contact with ballast). Three geosynthetics (geotextile, geogrid and geocomposite) were submitted to mechanical damage and abrasion damage using index laboratory tests. The geosynthetics were exposed first individually to each agent (single exposure) and then sequentially to the two agents (multiple exposures). To ensure the results were statistical representative, each set of tests was performed three times. The consequences of the damage induced were visible (naked eye). Abrasion damage was found the most critical damage mechanism for the tensile properties, particularly for the geogrid and geocomposite tested. The connections between their components created potential fragility points in the abrasion test. Due to its structure, combined with high mass per unit area and thickness, the geotextile tested survived well the damage induced. A positive synergy between the mechanical and the abrasion damage induced was found for the tensile properties of the geosynthetics most affected by damage, more important for their tensile strength than for their secant stiffness. The mechanical damage was the most critical mechanism for the permittivity of the geotextile and the geocomposite, likely due to clogging of their pores. For the permittivity and the characteristic opening size of these geosynthetics, negative synergy between mechanical and abrasion damage was found; the traditional approach was found likely to result in unsafe estimates of these properties.
50-63
Pinho-Lopes, M.
b7e5f7d6-90d8-48cc-b991-0495445fcea4
Lopes, M.L.
dca0c06e-aaa8-47df-923f-5fa9973552ba
Pinho-Lopes, M.
b7e5f7d6-90d8-48cc-b991-0495445fcea4
Lopes, M.L.
dca0c06e-aaa8-47df-923f-5fa9973552ba

Pinho-Lopes, M. and Lopes, M.L. (2015) Synergisms between laboratory mechanical and abrasion damage on mechanical and hydraulic properties of geosynthetics. Transportation Geotechnics, 4, 50-63. (doi:10.1016/j.trgeo.2015.07.001).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This paper analyses the existence of synergisms between some endurance durability agents of geosynthetics – mechanical damage (usually associated with installation) and abrasion damage (often associated with cyclic actions, for example due to contact with ballast). Three geosynthetics (geotextile, geogrid and geocomposite) were submitted to mechanical damage and abrasion damage using index laboratory tests. The geosynthetics were exposed first individually to each agent (single exposure) and then sequentially to the two agents (multiple exposures). To ensure the results were statistical representative, each set of tests was performed three times. The consequences of the damage induced were visible (naked eye). Abrasion damage was found the most critical damage mechanism for the tensile properties, particularly for the geogrid and geocomposite tested. The connections between their components created potential fragility points in the abrasion test. Due to its structure, combined with high mass per unit area and thickness, the geotextile tested survived well the damage induced. A positive synergy between the mechanical and the abrasion damage induced was found for the tensile properties of the geosynthetics most affected by damage, more important for their tensile strength than for their secant stiffness. The mechanical damage was the most critical mechanism for the permittivity of the geotextile and the geocomposite, likely due to clogging of their pores. For the permittivity and the characteristic opening size of these geosynthetics, negative synergy between mechanical and abrasion damage was found; the traditional approach was found likely to result in unsafe estimates of these properties.

Text
__soton.ac.uk_ude_PersonalFiles_Users_mpl1c12_mydocuments_02_publicacoes_2015_AR_MPL_MLL_repeticoes_2015_Transportation_Geotechnics_submissao_final_2015_MPL_MLL_TG_Synergisms_ACCEPTED.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Download (1MB)
Text
__userfiles.soton.ac.uk_Library_SLAs_Work_for_ALL's_Work_for_ePrints_Accepted Manuscripts_Pinho-Lopes_Synergisms.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 3 July 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 9 July 2015
Published date: September 2015
Organisations: Infrastructure Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 378713
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/378713
PURE UUID: f53ce350-5e22-4541-be00-bef179bf054d
ORCID for M. Pinho-Lopes: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0808-6307

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Jul 2015 13:56
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 05:19

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: M. Pinho-Lopes ORCID iD
Author: M.L. Lopes

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×