Disciplinarity: a barrier to quality assurance? The UK experience of area studies
Canning, John (2005) Disciplinarity: a barrier to quality assurance? The UK experience of area studies. Quality in Higher Education, 11, (1), 37-46. (doi:10.1080/13538320500074931).
Full text not available from this repository.
Quality assurance in UK higher education has maintained a very strong disciplinary bias. This brings about important challenges in assessing the quality of multidisciplinary courses as well as assessing the quality of the student experience of joint honours and combined honours degree courses. Area studies is a critical case of multi/interdisciplinarity. The area studies benchmarking statement delegates assessment (and thereby disciplinary conventions) to its constituent disciplines, but offers little guidance about the quality implications of this process. The paper concludes that quality assurance in higher education needs to develop a greater sensitivity to the disciplinary nature of the identity of academics, whilst at the same time assessing teaching and learning from a perspective that reflects the multidisciplinary experience of the student, rather than the disciplinary identity of teaching staff.
|Keywords:||area studies, multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, benchmarking, student experience|
|Subjects:||P Language and Literature
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education
|Divisions:||University Structure - Pre August 2011 > School of Humanities > Modern Languages
|Date Deposited:||26 May 2006|
|Last Modified:||02 Mar 2012 11:27|
|Contributors:||Canning, John (Author)
|Contact Email Address:||J.Canning@soton.ac.uk|
|RDF:||RDF+N-Triples, RDF+N3, RDF+XML, Browse.|
Actions (login required)