The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Genetic and morphological differentiation in Populus nigra L.:isolation by colonization or isolation by adaptation?

Genetic and morphological differentiation in Populus nigra L.:isolation by colonization or isolation by adaptation?
Genetic and morphological differentiation in Populus nigra L.:isolation by colonization or isolation by adaptation?
Identifying processes underlying the genetic and morphological differences among populations is a central question of evolutionary biology. Forest trees typically contain high levels of neutral genetic variation, and genetic differences are often correlated with geographic distance between populations [isolation by distance (IBD)] or are due to historic vicariance events [isolation by colonization (IBC)]. In contrast, morphological differences are largely due to local adaptation. Here, we examined genetic (microsatellite) and morphological (from a common garden experiment) variation in Populus nigra L., European black poplar, collected from 13 sites across western Europe and grown in a common garden in Belgium. Significant genetic differentiation was observed, with populations from France displaying greater admixture than the distinct Spanish and central European gene pools, consistent with previously described glacial refugia (IBC). Many quantitative traits displayed a bimodal distribution, approximately corresponding to small-leaf and large-leaf ecotypes. Examination of nine climatic variables revealed the sampling locations to have diverse climates, and although the correlation between morphological and climatic differences was significant, the pattern was not consistent with strict local adaptation. Partial Mantel tests based on multivariate summary statistics identified significant residual correlation in comparisons of small-leaf to large-leaf ecotypes, and within the small-leaf samples, but not within large-leaf ecotypes, indicating that variation within the small-leaf morphotype in particular may be adaptive. Some small-leaf populations experience climates very similar to those in large-leaf sites. We conclude that adaptive differentiation and persistent IBC acted in combination to produce the genetic and morphological patterns observed in P. nigra.
biomass, common garden experiment, european black poplar, leaf size, microsatellites
0962-1083
2641-2655
DeWoody, Jennifer
6b58fbfe-e1db-4510-aa2a-914f2987f914
Trewin, Harriet
ca9a9ee7-dd07-4c57-8aa1-5fb4ec3cbbdc
Taylor, Gail
DeWoody, Jennifer
6b58fbfe-e1db-4510-aa2a-914f2987f914
Trewin, Harriet
ca9a9ee7-dd07-4c57-8aa1-5fb4ec3cbbdc
Taylor, Gail

DeWoody, Jennifer, Trewin, Harriet and Taylor, Gail (2015) Genetic and morphological differentiation in Populus nigra L.:isolation by colonization or isolation by adaptation? Molecular Ecology, 24 (11), 2641-2655. (doi:10.1111/mec.13192).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Identifying processes underlying the genetic and morphological differences among populations is a central question of evolutionary biology. Forest trees typically contain high levels of neutral genetic variation, and genetic differences are often correlated with geographic distance between populations [isolation by distance (IBD)] or are due to historic vicariance events [isolation by colonization (IBC)]. In contrast, morphological differences are largely due to local adaptation. Here, we examined genetic (microsatellite) and morphological (from a common garden experiment) variation in Populus nigra L., European black poplar, collected from 13 sites across western Europe and grown in a common garden in Belgium. Significant genetic differentiation was observed, with populations from France displaying greater admixture than the distinct Spanish and central European gene pools, consistent with previously described glacial refugia (IBC). Many quantitative traits displayed a bimodal distribution, approximately corresponding to small-leaf and large-leaf ecotypes. Examination of nine climatic variables revealed the sampling locations to have diverse climates, and although the correlation between morphological and climatic differences was significant, the pattern was not consistent with strict local adaptation. Partial Mantel tests based on multivariate summary statistics identified significant residual correlation in comparisons of small-leaf to large-leaf ecotypes, and within the small-leaf samples, but not within large-leaf ecotypes, indicating that variation within the small-leaf morphotype in particular may be adaptive. Some small-leaf populations experience climates very similar to those in large-leaf sites. We conclude that adaptive differentiation and persistent IBC acted in combination to produce the genetic and morphological patterns observed in P. nigra.

Text
Genetic and morphological differentiation in Populus nigraL_isolation by colonization or isolation.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (541kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 2 April 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 14 May 2015
Published date: June 2015
Keywords: biomass, common garden experiment, european black poplar, leaf size, microsatellites
Organisations: Centre for Biological Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 380218
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/380218
ISSN: 0962-1083
PURE UUID: 05ad3376-25bb-4c96-b183-33c6cf2b539b

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Sep 2015 11:52
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 20:56

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jennifer DeWoody
Author: Harriet Trewin
Author: Gail Taylor

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×