The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The use of participatory methods & simulation tools to understand the complexity of rural food security

The use of participatory methods & simulation tools to understand the complexity of rural food security
The use of participatory methods & simulation tools to understand the complexity of rural food security
The realisation of food security is hindered by its inherently complex nature. Within less developed countries, a number of contributing factors act to undermine food security. At the level of rural households, livelihoods remain largely dependent upon agriculture. Structural factors such as small plot sizes, widespread soil degradation and a continued dependence upon rain fed agriculture, leave smallholders vulnerable to climatic shocks. A key objective of the project was to explore the potential role of simulation tools in understanding the complexity of sustainable food provision. The use of simulation techniques can act as a tool to explore the complex social, ecological and political factors affecting food availability, access and utilisation. Agent-based modelling (ABM) is one possible technique, which comprises a computerised simulation of agents located within an environment. Each agent provides a computational representation of a real-world actor, such as an individual, household or institution. Behaviour at the system level is an emergent property of the collective behaviour at the local level, resulting from the interactions between agents and the environment through predisposed rules. Depending on the type of rules they abide by, ABM can be categorised as abstract, experimental, historical or empirical. The aim here was to determine whether results from participatory exercises with smallholder farmers could be utilised in the construction of an empirical ABM. By taking a systems approach, ABM can highlight knowledge gaps, where data and understanding of feedbacks may be lacking. However, a shortage of effective protocols and architectures to represent agents and their interactions may limit their potential. Behavioural decisions and coping strategies of farmers in the face of drought formed the focus of this study. A participatory rural appraisal (PRA) exercise was designed to elicit greater understanding of smallholder responses to drought; as well as the perceived impact of government interventions in the form of input subsidies. PRA is a broad term that encompasses a wide range of data collection techniques that aim to involve local stakeholders in analysing their own situation. Tools include matrix scoring, seasonal calendars and wellbeing ranking exercises. Results from participatory fieldwork were successfully incorporated into an agent-based model of Malawian smallholders. However, scarce availability of data was identified as a key factor undermining model robustness. Initial implementation of the model found inferences could be made concerning the impact of policy upon household decision-making and food security. Overall the study provides fertile ground for future work. It is hoped that by integrating PRA exercises and ABM it will be possible to create a collaborative framework that promotes interaction between scientists, policy makers and stakeholders, alike
978-3-940924-62-9
170-192
Gerlach Press
Dobbie, S.
5fd9500a-c374-4588-a356-ae4e55b692b4
Dyke, James G.
e2cc1b09-ae44-4525-88ed-87ee08baad2c
Schreckenberg, Kate
Dobbie, S.
5fd9500a-c374-4588-a356-ae4e55b692b4
Dyke, James G.
e2cc1b09-ae44-4525-88ed-87ee08baad2c
Schreckenberg, Kate

Dobbie, S. and Dyke, James G. (2015) The use of participatory methods & simulation tools to understand the complexity of rural food security. Schreckenberg, Kate (ed.) In Sustainable Development Challenges in the Arab States of the Gulf. Gerlach Press. pp. 170-192 .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

The realisation of food security is hindered by its inherently complex nature. Within less developed countries, a number of contributing factors act to undermine food security. At the level of rural households, livelihoods remain largely dependent upon agriculture. Structural factors such as small plot sizes, widespread soil degradation and a continued dependence upon rain fed agriculture, leave smallholders vulnerable to climatic shocks. A key objective of the project was to explore the potential role of simulation tools in understanding the complexity of sustainable food provision. The use of simulation techniques can act as a tool to explore the complex social, ecological and political factors affecting food availability, access and utilisation. Agent-based modelling (ABM) is one possible technique, which comprises a computerised simulation of agents located within an environment. Each agent provides a computational representation of a real-world actor, such as an individual, household or institution. Behaviour at the system level is an emergent property of the collective behaviour at the local level, resulting from the interactions between agents and the environment through predisposed rules. Depending on the type of rules they abide by, ABM can be categorised as abstract, experimental, historical or empirical. The aim here was to determine whether results from participatory exercises with smallholder farmers could be utilised in the construction of an empirical ABM. By taking a systems approach, ABM can highlight knowledge gaps, where data and understanding of feedbacks may be lacking. However, a shortage of effective protocols and architectures to represent agents and their interactions may limit their potential. Behavioural decisions and coping strategies of farmers in the face of drought formed the focus of this study. A participatory rural appraisal (PRA) exercise was designed to elicit greater understanding of smallholder responses to drought; as well as the perceived impact of government interventions in the form of input subsidies. PRA is a broad term that encompasses a wide range of data collection techniques that aim to involve local stakeholders in analysing their own situation. Tools include matrix scoring, seasonal calendars and wellbeing ranking exercises. Results from participatory fieldwork were successfully incorporated into an agent-based model of Malawian smallholders. However, scarce availability of data was identified as a key factor undermining model robustness. Initial implementation of the model found inferences could be made concerning the impact of policy upon household decision-making and food security. Overall the study provides fertile ground for future work. It is hoped that by integrating PRA exercises and ABM it will be possible to create a collaborative framework that promotes interaction between scientists, policy makers and stakeholders, alike

Text
Dobbie_Dkye_Schreckenberg_2015.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (1MB)
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 30 September 2015
Venue - Dates: 5th Gulf Research Meeting, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2014-08-25 - 2014-08-28
Organisations: Centre for Environmental Science

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 380930
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/380930
ISBN: 978-3-940924-62-9
PURE UUID: e29d995f-86dc-492e-af46-26b1760f563f
ORCID for James G. Dyke: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6779-1682

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Sep 2015 10:09
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 21:07

Export record

Contributors

Author: S. Dobbie
Author: James G. Dyke ORCID iD
Editor: Kate Schreckenberg

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×