The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Dancing with Parkinson's disease: feasibility randomised controlled trial

Dancing with Parkinson's disease: feasibility randomised controlled trial
Dancing with Parkinson's disease: feasibility randomised controlled trial
Background: Self-help and physical leisure activities are important to maintain safe functional mobility among older people.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of conducting a phase III randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the benefits of dance among people with Parkinsons’ (PwP). We built on previous proof-of-principle trials, focusing on areas of greatest methodological uncertainty.

Methods: Ethical approval was granted by the National Research Ethics Service (NRES) Committee South Central Southampton A, reference: 12/SC/0355. We screened 103 PwP and fifty-one were recruited and randomised to the control (n = 15) or experimental group (n = 36). Three ballroom (Social Foxtrot, Waltz, Tango) and 3 Latin American (Rumba, Cha Cha, Rock ‘n’ Roll) dances were taught by professional teachers in a dance centre. The classes lasted one hour, twice a week, for 10 weeks and PwP danced with their spouse, a friend or a volunteer. A battery of assessments (balance, confidence, spinal posture, mobility and health outcome) was completed at home by an assessor (unaware of participant group allocation) at baseline, 3 and 6 months post-randomisation.

Results: The average age of participants was 71 years (49-85); 25 were male. Partners and volunteers were of similar age. The feasibility findings focused on recruitment, retention, outcome measures and dance selection. Target recruitment was achieved, with most PwP coming from Parkinsons’ UK Groups. Of the 35 people who took part in the dance classes, 19 nominated a dance partner and 16 danced with healthy volunteer dance partners (recruited by the study team). Five people did not complete the dance classes for health and personal reasons, with one disliking dancing. The remaining participants completed on average 18 of the 20 classes. Travel assistance was costly and time-consuming but important to participants. One data set was unavailable at 3 months and 4 data points were missing from the assessment data. Outcome variables were compared between dance and control groups at 3 and 6 months separately, in analyses of covariance. Estimated mean differences between dance and control (controlled for baseline differences) were explored with model based 95% confidence intervals. As expected, no overall significant differences were found in this feasibility study. Subgroup analysis identified that (a) previous fallers, (b) PwP who have had the condition for longer (diagnosed = 2011) and (c) male participants appeared to benefit most from the dance intervention. Findings suggested trends and significant improvements (p < 0.05) for balance (b and c), balance confidence and spinal posture (a–c). Difficulties experienced during dance related to the need to take large steps and weight transfer. The Waltz and Social Foxtrot were reported as the least challenging; with the most challenging being the Cha-Cha and Rumba. The instructors’ interpersonal skills were widely regarded as enabling confidence and motivation. Participants gained significant enjoyment from dancing and from interacting with others; improvements in well-being were reported. Compatibility with their dance partner was important.

Conclusion(s): We have demonstrated the feasibility of conducting a RCT to evaluate the benefits of ballroom and Latin American dancing for PwP, with procedural recommendations for the main trial.

Implications: More research is needed.
parkinson's, dance, partnered
0031-9406
e384-e385
Fitton, C.
6288734e-9b6e-470d-b420-33c16d65b879
Kunkel, D.
6b6c65d5-1d03-4a13-9db8-1342cd43f352
Hulbert, S.
fa9a035d-84d9-435d-bbb7-f5d5f4647b7f
Robison, J.
e39bf280-2265-431d-8935-0f528e99c812
Roberts, L.
0a937943-5246-4877-bd6b-4dcd172b5cd0
Pickering, R.
4a828314-7ddf-4f96-abed-3407017d4c90
Wiles, R.
5bdc597b-716c-4f60-9f45-631ecca25571
Roberts, H.
5ea688b1-ef7a-4173-9da0-26290e18f253
Ashburn, A.
818b9ce8-f025-429e-9532-43ee4fd5f991
Fitton, C.
6288734e-9b6e-470d-b420-33c16d65b879
Kunkel, D.
6b6c65d5-1d03-4a13-9db8-1342cd43f352
Hulbert, S.
fa9a035d-84d9-435d-bbb7-f5d5f4647b7f
Robison, J.
e39bf280-2265-431d-8935-0f528e99c812
Roberts, L.
0a937943-5246-4877-bd6b-4dcd172b5cd0
Pickering, R.
4a828314-7ddf-4f96-abed-3407017d4c90
Wiles, R.
5bdc597b-716c-4f60-9f45-631ecca25571
Roberts, H.
5ea688b1-ef7a-4173-9da0-26290e18f253
Ashburn, A.
818b9ce8-f025-429e-9532-43ee4fd5f991

Fitton, C., Kunkel, D., Hulbert, S., Robison, J., Roberts, L., Pickering, R., Wiles, R., Roberts, H. and Ashburn, A. (2015) Dancing with Parkinson's disease: feasibility randomised controlled trial. [in special issue: World Confederation for Physical Therapy Congress 2015 Abstracts, Singapore, 1-4 May 2015] Physiotherapy, 101, supplement S1, e384-e385. (doi:10.1016/j.physio.2015.03.606).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Self-help and physical leisure activities are important to maintain safe functional mobility among older people.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of conducting a phase III randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the benefits of dance among people with Parkinsons’ (PwP). We built on previous proof-of-principle trials, focusing on areas of greatest methodological uncertainty.

Methods: Ethical approval was granted by the National Research Ethics Service (NRES) Committee South Central Southampton A, reference: 12/SC/0355. We screened 103 PwP and fifty-one were recruited and randomised to the control (n = 15) or experimental group (n = 36). Three ballroom (Social Foxtrot, Waltz, Tango) and 3 Latin American (Rumba, Cha Cha, Rock ‘n’ Roll) dances were taught by professional teachers in a dance centre. The classes lasted one hour, twice a week, for 10 weeks and PwP danced with their spouse, a friend or a volunteer. A battery of assessments (balance, confidence, spinal posture, mobility and health outcome) was completed at home by an assessor (unaware of participant group allocation) at baseline, 3 and 6 months post-randomisation.

Results: The average age of participants was 71 years (49-85); 25 were male. Partners and volunteers were of similar age. The feasibility findings focused on recruitment, retention, outcome measures and dance selection. Target recruitment was achieved, with most PwP coming from Parkinsons’ UK Groups. Of the 35 people who took part in the dance classes, 19 nominated a dance partner and 16 danced with healthy volunteer dance partners (recruited by the study team). Five people did not complete the dance classes for health and personal reasons, with one disliking dancing. The remaining participants completed on average 18 of the 20 classes. Travel assistance was costly and time-consuming but important to participants. One data set was unavailable at 3 months and 4 data points were missing from the assessment data. Outcome variables were compared between dance and control groups at 3 and 6 months separately, in analyses of covariance. Estimated mean differences between dance and control (controlled for baseline differences) were explored with model based 95% confidence intervals. As expected, no overall significant differences were found in this feasibility study. Subgroup analysis identified that (a) previous fallers, (b) PwP who have had the condition for longer (diagnosed = 2011) and (c) male participants appeared to benefit most from the dance intervention. Findings suggested trends and significant improvements (p < 0.05) for balance (b and c), balance confidence and spinal posture (a–c). Difficulties experienced during dance related to the need to take large steps and weight transfer. The Waltz and Social Foxtrot were reported as the least challenging; with the most challenging being the Cha-Cha and Rumba. The instructors’ interpersonal skills were widely regarded as enabling confidence and motivation. Participants gained significant enjoyment from dancing and from interacting with others; improvements in well-being were reported. Compatibility with their dance partner was important.

Conclusion(s): We have demonstrated the feasibility of conducting a RCT to evaluate the benefits of ballroom and Latin American dancing for PwP, with procedural recommendations for the main trial.

Implications: More research is needed.

Text
Dancing with Parkinson's Disease - feasibility randomised controlled trial.pdf - Other
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 3 May 2015
Keywords: parkinson's, dance, partnered
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 380996
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/380996
ISSN: 0031-9406
PURE UUID: 27accd9b-739f-494d-b9cb-a4dfe8b30e55
ORCID for D. Kunkel: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4449-1414
ORCID for L. Roberts: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2662-6696
ORCID for H. Roberts: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5291-1880

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Sep 2015 10:39
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: C. Fitton
Author: D. Kunkel ORCID iD
Author: S. Hulbert
Author: J. Robison
Author: L. Roberts ORCID iD
Author: R. Pickering
Author: R. Wiles
Author: H. Roberts ORCID iD
Author: A. Ashburn

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×