The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

On the existence of tests uniformly more powerful than the likelihood ratio test

On the existence of tests uniformly more powerful than the likelihood ratio test
On the existence of tests uniformly more powerful than the likelihood ratio test
For hypotheses concerning linear inequalities and k normal means, Berger (J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.84 (1989) 192–199) showed that the likelihood ratio test (LRT) is not very powerful, and uniformly more powerful tests which reject in some extra regions can be constructed under some conditions. In this article, we study whether uniformly more powerful tests of the form considered by Berger (1989) exist in some situations that are not covered by the results of Berger (1989). First, when the covariance matrix has a special structure which usually arises from the problem of comparing several treatments with a control, we show that there exists no such uniformly more powerful test for k = 2, and there always exists such a uniformly more powerful test for k ? 3. Secondly, when the common variance of the k independent normal populations is unknown, we again show the nonexistence of such a uniformly more powerful test for k = 2, and the existence of such a uniformly more powerful test for k ? 3. The method of proof can be applied to other situations, though it does not tell how to construct such a uniformly more powerful test.
likelihood ration test, uniformly more powerful test
0378-3758
19-35
Liu, Wei
b64150aa-d935-4209-804d-24c1b97e024a
Liu, Wei
b64150aa-d935-4209-804d-24c1b97e024a

Liu, Wei (1995) On the existence of tests uniformly more powerful than the likelihood ratio test. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 44 (1), 19-35. (doi:10.1016/0378-3758(94)00036-U).

Record type: Article

Abstract

For hypotheses concerning linear inequalities and k normal means, Berger (J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.84 (1989) 192–199) showed that the likelihood ratio test (LRT) is not very powerful, and uniformly more powerful tests which reject in some extra regions can be constructed under some conditions. In this article, we study whether uniformly more powerful tests of the form considered by Berger (1989) exist in some situations that are not covered by the results of Berger (1989). First, when the covariance matrix has a special structure which usually arises from the problem of comparing several treatments with a control, we show that there exists no such uniformly more powerful test for k = 2, and there always exists such a uniformly more powerful test for k ? 3. Secondly, when the common variance of the k independent normal populations is unknown, we again show the nonexistence of such a uniformly more powerful test for k = 2, and the existence of such a uniformly more powerful test for k ? 3. The method of proof can be applied to other situations, though it does not tell how to construct such a uniformly more powerful test.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: March 1995
Keywords: likelihood ration test, uniformly more powerful test
Organisations: Statistical Sciences Research Institute

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 381062
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/381062
ISSN: 0378-3758
PURE UUID: 6322a22c-6dfc-41fd-a867-37ba9c29e714
ORCID for Wei Liu: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4719-0345

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Oct 2015 09:03
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×