The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

On the panculturality of self-enhancement and self-protection motivation: the case for the universality of self-esteem

On the panculturality of self-enhancement and self-protection motivation: the case for the universality of self-esteem
On the panculturality of self-enhancement and self-protection motivation: the case for the universality of self-esteem
Do self-enhancement/self-protection and self-esteem reflect fundamental human motivations or are they culturally bound occurrences? The debate on universalism versus cultural relativism of self-motives and self-esteem shows no sign of abatement. We advance the debate by proposing the extended self-enhancing tactician model. The model aspires to account for two seemingly contradictory phenomena: cross-cultural invariance (equivalence of self-motive strength and self-esteem desire across cultures) and cross-cultural variability (differential manifestations of self-motives and self-esteem across cultures). The model's four foundational tenets address cross-cultural invariance: (1) The individual self is panculturally valued, and it is so over the relational or collective self; (2) The self-enhancement/self-protection motives are equally potent in East and West; (3) The structure of self-enhancement and self-protection strivings is similar across the cultural divide; and (4) the desire for self-esteem is pancultural. The SCENT-R model's four key postulates address cross-cultural variability. First, Easterners assign relative importance to, and report higher, liking-based self-esteem, as well as consider collectivistic attributes important and self-enhance on them, whereas Westerners assign relative importance to, and report higher, competence-based self-esteem, as well as consider individualistic attributes important and self-enhance on them. Second, when constraints on candid self-enhancement are lifted, Easterners behave like Westerners: they report higher modesty and lower self-esteem than Westerners, but, controlling for modesty, differences in self-esteem disappear; they self-enhance in competitive, but self-efface in cooperative, settings; they profit from other-mediated than own-initiated self-enhancement. Third, implicit self-esteem is similarly high across cultures. Fourth, self-esteem and self-enhancement/self-protection confer parallel benefits in East–West, depending in part on domain relevance. Self-enhancement and self-protection, as well as self-esteem, reflect fundamental human motivation
culture, motivation, self, self-enhancement, self-esteem, self-protection
978-0-12-802270-2
185-241
Elsevier
Sedikides, C.
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Gaertner, L.
66825abf-c97c-446c-afc1-966bc950df25
Cai, H.
b50ecca5-ee0a-4778-94b6-598959608574
Elliot, Andrew J.
Sedikides, C.
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Gaertner, L.
66825abf-c97c-446c-afc1-966bc950df25
Cai, H.
b50ecca5-ee0a-4778-94b6-598959608574
Elliot, Andrew J.

Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L. and Cai, H. (2015) On the panculturality of self-enhancement and self-protection motivation: the case for the universality of self-esteem. In, Elliot, Andrew J. (ed.) Advances in Motivation Science. Elsevier, pp. 185-241. (doi:10.1016/bs.adms.2015.04.002).

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

Do self-enhancement/self-protection and self-esteem reflect fundamental human motivations or are they culturally bound occurrences? The debate on universalism versus cultural relativism of self-motives and self-esteem shows no sign of abatement. We advance the debate by proposing the extended self-enhancing tactician model. The model aspires to account for two seemingly contradictory phenomena: cross-cultural invariance (equivalence of self-motive strength and self-esteem desire across cultures) and cross-cultural variability (differential manifestations of self-motives and self-esteem across cultures). The model's four foundational tenets address cross-cultural invariance: (1) The individual self is panculturally valued, and it is so over the relational or collective self; (2) The self-enhancement/self-protection motives are equally potent in East and West; (3) The structure of self-enhancement and self-protection strivings is similar across the cultural divide; and (4) the desire for self-esteem is pancultural. The SCENT-R model's four key postulates address cross-cultural variability. First, Easterners assign relative importance to, and report higher, liking-based self-esteem, as well as consider collectivistic attributes important and self-enhance on them, whereas Westerners assign relative importance to, and report higher, competence-based self-esteem, as well as consider individualistic attributes important and self-enhance on them. Second, when constraints on candid self-enhancement are lifted, Easterners behave like Westerners: they report higher modesty and lower self-esteem than Westerners, but, controlling for modesty, differences in self-esteem disappear; they self-enhance in competitive, but self-efface in cooperative, settings; they profit from other-mediated than own-initiated self-enhancement. Third, implicit self-esteem is similarly high across cultures. Fourth, self-esteem and self-enhancement/self-protection confer parallel benefits in East–West, depending in part on domain relevance. Self-enhancement and self-protection, as well as self-esteem, reflect fundamental human motivation

Text
__soton.ac.uk_ude_PersonalFiles_Users_gg_mydocuments_constantine publications pdf's_2015_Sedikides, Gaertner, & Cai, 2015eprints.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 2015
Keywords: culture, motivation, self, self-enhancement, self-esteem, self-protection

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 381166
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/381166
ISBN: 978-0-12-802270-2
PURE UUID: 93304469-2244-4e62-a724-e59c4655729b
ORCID for C. Sedikides: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4036-889X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Sep 2015 13:34
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: C. Sedikides ORCID iD
Author: L. Gaertner
Author: H. Cai
Editor: Andrew J. Elliot

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×