The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Lack of benefit of a primary care-based nurse-led education programme for people with osteoarthritis of the knee

Lack of benefit of a primary care-based nurse-led education programme for people with osteoarthritis of the knee
Lack of benefit of a primary care-based nurse-led education programme for people with osteoarthritis of the knee
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the commonest cause of locomotor disability and forms a major element of the workload of the primary care team. There is evidence that patient education may improve quality of life, physical functioning, mental health and coping as well as reducing health service use. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a primary care-based patient education programme (PEP) using a randomised controlled trial. A cluster randomised controlled trial, involving 22 practices, was used to determine the efficacy of a nurse-led education programme. The programme consisted of a home visit and four 1-h teaching sessions. Patients were assessed at baseline and then 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post intervention using 36-item Short Form (SF-36), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), arthritis helplessness index and a patient knowledge questionnaire. Direct interviews were used at baseline and at the 12-month follow-up. There were no differences in depression, OA knowledge, pain or physical ability at either 1 month or 1 year between the two groups. Control practices (65 patients from 12 practices) recruited significantly fewer patients than intervention practices (105 patients from ten practices, p=0.02). Control practices had more doctors (p=0.02), more non-white patients (p=0.007), fewer patients living alone (p=0.005) and lower levels of disability (p=0.008). We detected a lack of benefit of PEP for people with OA of the knee. This was thought to be due in part to the short intervention time employed and the heterogeneous nature of the disease and the population studied. �© Clinical Rheumatology 2005.
0770-3198
358-364
Victor, C.R.
5341326e-b945-42c1-becf-421fef7ca3e2
Triggs, E.
3d8e5932-5d5e-4022-a68a-586e69744c7f
Ross, F.
ec0958f8-b992-4e4a-b7e3-c474600390ba
Lord, J.
fd3b2bf0-9403-466a-8184-9303bdc80a9a
Axford, J.S.
b355b8f5-1dfd-4005-a7ee-d1e027bf6406
Victor, C.R.
5341326e-b945-42c1-becf-421fef7ca3e2
Triggs, E.
3d8e5932-5d5e-4022-a68a-586e69744c7f
Ross, F.
ec0958f8-b992-4e4a-b7e3-c474600390ba
Lord, J.
fd3b2bf0-9403-466a-8184-9303bdc80a9a
Axford, J.S.
b355b8f5-1dfd-4005-a7ee-d1e027bf6406

Victor, C.R., Triggs, E., Ross, F., Lord, J. and Axford, J.S. (2005) Lack of benefit of a primary care-based nurse-led education programme for people with osteoarthritis of the knee. Clinical Rheumatology, 24 (4), 358-364. (doi:10.1007/s10067-004-1001-9). (PMID:15937632)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the commonest cause of locomotor disability and forms a major element of the workload of the primary care team. There is evidence that patient education may improve quality of life, physical functioning, mental health and coping as well as reducing health service use. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a primary care-based patient education programme (PEP) using a randomised controlled trial. A cluster randomised controlled trial, involving 22 practices, was used to determine the efficacy of a nurse-led education programme. The programme consisted of a home visit and four 1-h teaching sessions. Patients were assessed at baseline and then 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post intervention using 36-item Short Form (SF-36), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), arthritis helplessness index and a patient knowledge questionnaire. Direct interviews were used at baseline and at the 12-month follow-up. There were no differences in depression, OA knowledge, pain or physical ability at either 1 month or 1 year between the two groups. Control practices (65 patients from 12 practices) recruited significantly fewer patients than intervention practices (105 patients from ten practices, p=0.02). Control practices had more doctors (p=0.02), more non-white patients (p=0.007), fewer patients living alone (p=0.005) and lower levels of disability (p=0.008). We detected a lack of benefit of PEP for people with OA of the knee. This was thought to be due in part to the short intervention time employed and the heterogeneous nature of the disease and the population studied. �© Clinical Rheumatology 2005.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 4 June 2005
Published date: August 2005
Additional Information: ID: 16822
Organisations: Primary Care & Population Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 382151
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/382151
ISSN: 0770-3198
PURE UUID: 21f5c1cc-3fde-4391-afea-180e009603ef
ORCID for J. Lord: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1086-1624

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Oct 2015 12:40
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:52

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: C.R. Victor
Author: E. Triggs
Author: F. Ross
Author: J. Lord ORCID iD
Author: J.S. Axford

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×