The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Estimating the prevalence of sexual function problems: the impact of morbidity criteria

Estimating the prevalence of sexual function problems: the impact of morbidity criteria
Estimating the prevalence of sexual function problems: the impact of morbidity criteria
Establishing the clinical significance of symptoms of sexual dysfunction is challenging. To address this, the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) introduced two new morbidity criteria (duration and symptom severity) to the existing criteria of distress. This study sought to establish the impact of these three criteria on the population prevalence of sexual function problems. The data come from a national probability survey (Natsal-3) and are based on 11,509 male and female participants aged 16–74, reporting at least one sexual partner in the past year. The key outcomes were: proportion of individuals reporting proxy measures of DSM-5 problems, and the proportion of those meeting morbidity criteria. We found that among sexually active men, the prevalence of reporting one or more of four specific sexual problems was 38.2%, but 4.2% after applying the three morbidity criteria; corresponding figures for women reporting one or more of three specific sexual problems, were 22.8% and 3.6%. Just over a third of men and women reporting a problem meeting all three morbidity criteria had sought help in the last year. We conclude that the DSM-5 morbidity criteria impose a focus on clinically significant symptoms
prevalence, DSM-5, sexual function problems, morbidity criteria, classification
0022-4499
1-13
Mitchell, Kirstin R.
525c7c26-d6b5-4cd2-9ab5-10b20a07d200
Jones, Kyle G.
7acb89b4-43a2-4421-a359-0ef9c5605490
Wellings, Kaye
8f8de2a3-f20d-455f-a128-339773e4fee4
Johnson, Anne M.
0db0b859-636b-483d-a9a9-9c568252b1b9
Graham, Cynthia A.
ac400331-f231-4449-a69b-ec9a477224c8
Datta, Jessica
ddc8f566-9efa-41b4-81c0-ad67f2e0fc61
Copas, Andrew J.
10c9d680-f510-4969-ab9a-9e2a61568cb8
Bancroft, John
2b95cc70-bb5a-482b-b6a1-e8535fccd837
Sonnenberg, Pam
b42ffdaa-2ad7-4736-8008-120726a9cec3
Macdowall, Wendy
b2546426-59d8-48eb-9f0e-f287d6f84d5a
Field, Nigel
cd261889-da06-4fed-bc69-7f2f0daf6240
Mercer, Catherine H.
621b0984-4fb8-411c-9575-35ce23df71c6
Mitchell, Kirstin R.
525c7c26-d6b5-4cd2-9ab5-10b20a07d200
Jones, Kyle G.
7acb89b4-43a2-4421-a359-0ef9c5605490
Wellings, Kaye
8f8de2a3-f20d-455f-a128-339773e4fee4
Johnson, Anne M.
0db0b859-636b-483d-a9a9-9c568252b1b9
Graham, Cynthia A.
ac400331-f231-4449-a69b-ec9a477224c8
Datta, Jessica
ddc8f566-9efa-41b4-81c0-ad67f2e0fc61
Copas, Andrew J.
10c9d680-f510-4969-ab9a-9e2a61568cb8
Bancroft, John
2b95cc70-bb5a-482b-b6a1-e8535fccd837
Sonnenberg, Pam
b42ffdaa-2ad7-4736-8008-120726a9cec3
Macdowall, Wendy
b2546426-59d8-48eb-9f0e-f287d6f84d5a
Field, Nigel
cd261889-da06-4fed-bc69-7f2f0daf6240
Mercer, Catherine H.
621b0984-4fb8-411c-9575-35ce23df71c6

Mitchell, Kirstin R., Jones, Kyle G., Wellings, Kaye, Johnson, Anne M., Graham, Cynthia A., Datta, Jessica, Copas, Andrew J., Bancroft, John, Sonnenberg, Pam, Macdowall, Wendy, Field, Nigel and Mercer, Catherine H. (2015) Estimating the prevalence of sexual function problems: the impact of morbidity criteria. The Journal of Sex Research, 1-13. (doi:10.1080/00224499.2015.1089214).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Establishing the clinical significance of symptoms of sexual dysfunction is challenging. To address this, the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) introduced two new morbidity criteria (duration and symptom severity) to the existing criteria of distress. This study sought to establish the impact of these three criteria on the population prevalence of sexual function problems. The data come from a national probability survey (Natsal-3) and are based on 11,509 male and female participants aged 16–74, reporting at least one sexual partner in the past year. The key outcomes were: proportion of individuals reporting proxy measures of DSM-5 problems, and the proportion of those meeting morbidity criteria. We found that among sexually active men, the prevalence of reporting one or more of four specific sexual problems was 38.2%, but 4.2% after applying the three morbidity criteria; corresponding figures for women reporting one or more of three specific sexual problems, were 22.8% and 3.6%. Just over a third of men and women reporting a problem meeting all three morbidity criteria had sought help in the last year. We conclude that the DSM-5 morbidity criteria impose a focus on clinically significant symptoms

Text
Mitchell et al Estimating the prevalence 2015.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (484kB)

More information

Published date: 25 November 2015
Keywords: prevalence, DSM-5, sexual function problems, morbidity criteria, classification
Organisations: Psychology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 384778
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/384778
ISSN: 0022-4499
PURE UUID: 66553f6e-d4c4-4d08-83be-cb8572692df3
ORCID for Cynthia A. Graham: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7884-599X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Jan 2016 09:09
Last modified: 21 Mar 2024 02:47

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Kirstin R. Mitchell
Author: Kyle G. Jones
Author: Kaye Wellings
Author: Anne M. Johnson
Author: Jessica Datta
Author: Andrew J. Copas
Author: John Bancroft
Author: Pam Sonnenberg
Author: Wendy Macdowall
Author: Nigel Field
Author: Catherine H. Mercer

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×