The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

How reliable are reports of early adolescent reproductive and sexual health events in demographic and health surveys?

How reliable are reports of early adolescent reproductive and sexual health events in demographic and health surveys?
How reliable are reports of early adolescent reproductive and sexual health events in demographic and health surveys?
CONTEXT: Age at sexual debut, age at first marriage or first union and age at first birth are among the most widely used indicators of health and well-being for female adolescents. However, the accuracy of estimates for these indicators, particularly for younger adolescents, is poorly understood.
METHODS: For each of nine countries in Africa and Latin America, Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data from two surveys conducted five years apart were used to examine women’s reports of age at sexual debut, marriage or first union, and first birth. The consistency of estimates between surveys and across birth cohorts is described, focusing particularly on the reporting of events occurring before age 15 and age 16.
RESULTS: Marked differences in estimates for very early first births and marriage were found. Women aged 15–19 were much less likely to report marriages and first births before age 15 than were women from the same birth cohort when asked five years later at ages 20–24. Early sexual debut was reported more consistently in consecutive surveys than early marriages or births.
CONCLUSIONS: Caution should be exercised when inferring changes in early adolescent sexual and reproductive health on the basis of estimates from the DHS. Greater effort should be made to develop data collection instruments that reduce misreporting of self-reported data from women sampled in household surveys.
1944-0405
210-217
Neal, Sarah
2b63ebf7-1cf9-423d-80a2-bd99a759f784
Hosegood, Victoria
c59a89d5-5edc-42dd-b282-f44458fd2993
Neal, Sarah
2b63ebf7-1cf9-423d-80a2-bd99a759f784
Hosegood, Victoria
c59a89d5-5edc-42dd-b282-f44458fd2993

Neal, Sarah and Hosegood, Victoria (2015) How reliable are reports of early adolescent reproductive and sexual health events in demographic and health surveys? International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 41 (4), 210-217. (doi:10.1363/4121015). (PMID:26871729)

Record type: Article

Abstract

CONTEXT: Age at sexual debut, age at first marriage or first union and age at first birth are among the most widely used indicators of health and well-being for female adolescents. However, the accuracy of estimates for these indicators, particularly for younger adolescents, is poorly understood.
METHODS: For each of nine countries in Africa and Latin America, Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data from two surveys conducted five years apart were used to examine women’s reports of age at sexual debut, marriage or first union, and first birth. The consistency of estimates between surveys and across birth cohorts is described, focusing particularly on the reporting of events occurring before age 15 and age 16.
RESULTS: Marked differences in estimates for very early first births and marriage were found. Women aged 15–19 were much less likely to report marriages and first births before age 15 than were women from the same birth cohort when asked five years later at ages 20–24. Early sexual debut was reported more consistently in consecutive surveys than early marriages or births.
CONCLUSIONS: Caution should be exercised when inferring changes in early adolescent sexual and reproductive health on the basis of estimates from the DHS. Greater effort should be made to develop data collection instruments that reduce misreporting of self-reported data from women sampled in household surveys.

Text
4121015.pdf - Version of Record
Download (272kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: December 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 13 December 2015
Published date: December 2015
Organisations: Social Statistics & Demography

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 386889
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/386889
ISSN: 1944-0405
PURE UUID: 3ea1f99b-68cf-408e-a92f-2d4db7e250d5
ORCID for Sarah Neal: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1812-7221
ORCID for Victoria Hosegood: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2244-2518

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Feb 2016 10:19
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:37

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×