The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Financial accessibility and user fee reforms for maternal healthcare in five sub-Saharan countries: a quasi-experimental analysis

Financial accessibility and user fee reforms for maternal healthcare in five sub-Saharan countries: a quasi-experimental analysis
Financial accessibility and user fee reforms for maternal healthcare in five sub-Saharan countries: a quasi-experimental analysis
Objectives: Evidence on whether removing fees benefits the poorest is patchy and weak. The aim of this paper is to measure the impact of user fee reforms on the probability of giving birth in an institution or undergoing a caesarean section (CS) in Ghana, Burkina Faso, Zambia, Cameroon and Nigeria for the poorest strata of the population.

Setting: Women's experience of user fees in 5 African countries.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Using quasi-experimental regression analysis we tested the impact of user fee reforms on facilities’ births and CS differentiated by wealth, education and residence in Burkina Faso and Ghana. Mapping of the literature followed by key informant interviews are used to verify details of reform implementation and to confirm and support our countries’ choice.

Participants: We analysed data from consecutive surveys in 5 countries: 2 case countries that experienced reforms (Ghana and Burkina Faso) by contrast with 3 that did not experience reforms (Zambia, Cameroon, Nigeria).

Results: User fee reforms are associated with a significant percentage of the increase in access to facility births (27 percentage points) and to a much lesser extent to CS (0.7 percentage points). Poor (but not the poorest), and non-educated women, and those in rural areas benefitted the most from the reforms. User fees reforms have had a higher impact in Burkina Faso compared with Ghana.

Conclusions: Findings show a clear positive impact on access when user fees are removed, but limited evidence for improved availability of CS for those most in need. More women from rural areas and from lower socioeconomic backgrounds give birth in health facilities after fee reform. Speed and quality of implementation might be the key reason behind the differences between the 2 case countries. This calls for more research into the impact of reforms on quality of care.
1-9
Leone, Tiziana
bad788fd-5008-4a20-ad39-282fd96e6aca
Cetorelli, Valeria
b9e1cb0b-f6a7-4a6d-97dc-943b9fbfd9bc
Neal, Sarah
2b63ebf7-1cf9-423d-80a2-bd99a759f784
Matthews, Zoe
ebaee878-8cb8-415f-8aa1-3af2c3856f55
Leone, Tiziana
bad788fd-5008-4a20-ad39-282fd96e6aca
Cetorelli, Valeria
b9e1cb0b-f6a7-4a6d-97dc-943b9fbfd9bc
Neal, Sarah
2b63ebf7-1cf9-423d-80a2-bd99a759f784
Matthews, Zoe
ebaee878-8cb8-415f-8aa1-3af2c3856f55

Leone, Tiziana, Cetorelli, Valeria, Neal, Sarah and Matthews, Zoe (2016) Financial accessibility and user fee reforms for maternal healthcare in five sub-Saharan countries: a quasi-experimental analysis. BMJ Open, 6 (e009692), 1-9. (doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009692).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: Evidence on whether removing fees benefits the poorest is patchy and weak. The aim of this paper is to measure the impact of user fee reforms on the probability of giving birth in an institution or undergoing a caesarean section (CS) in Ghana, Burkina Faso, Zambia, Cameroon and Nigeria for the poorest strata of the population.

Setting: Women's experience of user fees in 5 African countries.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Using quasi-experimental regression analysis we tested the impact of user fee reforms on facilities’ births and CS differentiated by wealth, education and residence in Burkina Faso and Ghana. Mapping of the literature followed by key informant interviews are used to verify details of reform implementation and to confirm and support our countries’ choice.

Participants: We analysed data from consecutive surveys in 5 countries: 2 case countries that experienced reforms (Ghana and Burkina Faso) by contrast with 3 that did not experience reforms (Zambia, Cameroon, Nigeria).

Results: User fee reforms are associated with a significant percentage of the increase in access to facility births (27 percentage points) and to a much lesser extent to CS (0.7 percentage points). Poor (but not the poorest), and non-educated women, and those in rural areas benefitted the most from the reforms. User fees reforms have had a higher impact in Burkina Faso compared with Ghana.

Conclusions: Findings show a clear positive impact on access when user fees are removed, but limited evidence for improved availability of CS for those most in need. More women from rural areas and from lower socioeconomic backgrounds give birth in health facilities after fee reform. Speed and quality of implementation might be the key reason behind the differences between the 2 case countries. This calls for more research into the impact of reforms on quality of care.

Text
BMJ Open-2016-Leone-.pdf - Version of Record
Download (971kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 17 November 2015
Published date: 28 January 2016
Organisations: Social Statistics & Demography

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 386890
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/386890
PURE UUID: 58cd0063-75cb-4d87-be89-89fc08912844
ORCID for Sarah Neal: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1812-7221
ORCID for Zoe Matthews: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1533-6618

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Feb 2016 10:25
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:34

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Tiziana Leone
Author: Valeria Cetorelli
Author: Sarah Neal ORCID iD
Author: Zoe Matthews ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×